Cargando…
The influence of various distractions prior to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled study
BACKGROUND: Although many patients still have anxiety about upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy, there have been few reports on the influence of distractions for a person who is going to undergo upper GI endoscopy soon. This study was a prospective randomized controlled study investigating the inf...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6114187/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30157771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-018-0859-y |
_version_ | 1783351142250446848 |
---|---|
author | Sogabe, Masahiro Okahisa, Toshiya Adachi, Yuka Takehara, Masanori Hamada, Shinichi Okazaki, Jun Fujino, Yasuteru Fukuya, Akira Kagemoto, Kaizo Hirao, Akihiro Okamoto, Koichi Nakasono, Masahiko Takayama, Tetsuji |
author_facet | Sogabe, Masahiro Okahisa, Toshiya Adachi, Yuka Takehara, Masanori Hamada, Shinichi Okazaki, Jun Fujino, Yasuteru Fukuya, Akira Kagemoto, Kaizo Hirao, Akihiro Okamoto, Koichi Nakasono, Masahiko Takayama, Tetsuji |
author_sort | Sogabe, Masahiro |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Although many patients still have anxiety about upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy, there have been few reports on the influence of distractions for a person who is going to undergo upper GI endoscopy soon. This study was a prospective randomized controlled study investigating the influence of distractions, such as auditive and visual distractions using subjective and objective assessments including autonomic nervous function prior to upper GI endoscopy. METHODS: 206 subjects who underwent upper GI endoscopy as regular health check-ups were divided randomly into 4 groups prior to upper GI endoscopy; group 1 (control group), group 2 (auditive group), group 3 (visual group), and group 4 (combination group). We measured vital signs, autonomic nervous function, profile of mood state (POMS), and the impression for upper GI endoscopy pre- and post-distraction in the 4 groups. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in vital signs between 5 and 15 min after sitting in group 1, however, several vital signs in all distraction groups improved significantly after distraction (Pulse rate (P): p < 0.001 in group 4; blood pressure: p < 0.05 in group 2, 3, 4) and the rate of decrease in P and diastolic blood pressure was highest in group 4 (p < 0.001). Several scores of POMS and the impression for upper GI endoscopy post-distraction improved significantly compared to pre-distraction between distraction groups and the satisfaction for distraction was highest in group 4 (p < 0.01). Regarding autonomic nerve function, the low- frequency power/ high- frequency power ratio post-distraction was significantly lower than that pre-distraction in all distraction groups (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although auditive distraction alone and visual distraction alone were effective, a combination distraction was more effective than any other distraction by subjective and objective assessments. These distractions, which were simple and safe, may play an assistive role in the stability of physical and psychological conditions prior to upper GI endoscopy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN000022801. Registered on 10 July 2016. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6114187 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61141872018-09-04 The influence of various distractions prior to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled study Sogabe, Masahiro Okahisa, Toshiya Adachi, Yuka Takehara, Masanori Hamada, Shinichi Okazaki, Jun Fujino, Yasuteru Fukuya, Akira Kagemoto, Kaizo Hirao, Akihiro Okamoto, Koichi Nakasono, Masahiko Takayama, Tetsuji BMC Gastroenterol Research Article BACKGROUND: Although many patients still have anxiety about upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy, there have been few reports on the influence of distractions for a person who is going to undergo upper GI endoscopy soon. This study was a prospective randomized controlled study investigating the influence of distractions, such as auditive and visual distractions using subjective and objective assessments including autonomic nervous function prior to upper GI endoscopy. METHODS: 206 subjects who underwent upper GI endoscopy as regular health check-ups were divided randomly into 4 groups prior to upper GI endoscopy; group 1 (control group), group 2 (auditive group), group 3 (visual group), and group 4 (combination group). We measured vital signs, autonomic nervous function, profile of mood state (POMS), and the impression for upper GI endoscopy pre- and post-distraction in the 4 groups. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in vital signs between 5 and 15 min after sitting in group 1, however, several vital signs in all distraction groups improved significantly after distraction (Pulse rate (P): p < 0.001 in group 4; blood pressure: p < 0.05 in group 2, 3, 4) and the rate of decrease in P and diastolic blood pressure was highest in group 4 (p < 0.001). Several scores of POMS and the impression for upper GI endoscopy post-distraction improved significantly compared to pre-distraction between distraction groups and the satisfaction for distraction was highest in group 4 (p < 0.01). Regarding autonomic nerve function, the low- frequency power/ high- frequency power ratio post-distraction was significantly lower than that pre-distraction in all distraction groups (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although auditive distraction alone and visual distraction alone were effective, a combination distraction was more effective than any other distraction by subjective and objective assessments. These distractions, which were simple and safe, may play an assistive role in the stability of physical and psychological conditions prior to upper GI endoscopy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN000022801. Registered on 10 July 2016. BioMed Central 2018-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6114187/ /pubmed/30157771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-018-0859-y Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Sogabe, Masahiro Okahisa, Toshiya Adachi, Yuka Takehara, Masanori Hamada, Shinichi Okazaki, Jun Fujino, Yasuteru Fukuya, Akira Kagemoto, Kaizo Hirao, Akihiro Okamoto, Koichi Nakasono, Masahiko Takayama, Tetsuji The influence of various distractions prior to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled study |
title | The influence of various distractions prior to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled study |
title_full | The influence of various distractions prior to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled study |
title_fullStr | The influence of various distractions prior to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled study |
title_full_unstemmed | The influence of various distractions prior to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled study |
title_short | The influence of various distractions prior to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled study |
title_sort | influence of various distractions prior to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6114187/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30157771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-018-0859-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sogabemasahiro theinfluenceofvariousdistractionspriortouppergastrointestinalendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT okahisatoshiya theinfluenceofvariousdistractionspriortouppergastrointestinalendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT adachiyuka theinfluenceofvariousdistractionspriortouppergastrointestinalendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT takeharamasanori theinfluenceofvariousdistractionspriortouppergastrointestinalendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT hamadashinichi theinfluenceofvariousdistractionspriortouppergastrointestinalendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT okazakijun theinfluenceofvariousdistractionspriortouppergastrointestinalendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT fujinoyasuteru theinfluenceofvariousdistractionspriortouppergastrointestinalendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT fukuyaakira theinfluenceofvariousdistractionspriortouppergastrointestinalendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT kagemotokaizo theinfluenceofvariousdistractionspriortouppergastrointestinalendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT hiraoakihiro theinfluenceofvariousdistractionspriortouppergastrointestinalendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT okamotokoichi theinfluenceofvariousdistractionspriortouppergastrointestinalendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT nakasonomasahiko theinfluenceofvariousdistractionspriortouppergastrointestinalendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT takayamatetsuji theinfluenceofvariousdistractionspriortouppergastrointestinalendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT sogabemasahiro influenceofvariousdistractionspriortouppergastrointestinalendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT okahisatoshiya influenceofvariousdistractionspriortouppergastrointestinalendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT adachiyuka influenceofvariousdistractionspriortouppergastrointestinalendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT takeharamasanori influenceofvariousdistractionspriortouppergastrointestinalendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT hamadashinichi influenceofvariousdistractionspriortouppergastrointestinalendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT okazakijun influenceofvariousdistractionspriortouppergastrointestinalendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT fujinoyasuteru influenceofvariousdistractionspriortouppergastrointestinalendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT fukuyaakira influenceofvariousdistractionspriortouppergastrointestinalendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT kagemotokaizo influenceofvariousdistractionspriortouppergastrointestinalendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT hiraoakihiro influenceofvariousdistractionspriortouppergastrointestinalendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT okamotokoichi influenceofvariousdistractionspriortouppergastrointestinalendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT nakasonomasahiko influenceofvariousdistractionspriortouppergastrointestinalendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy AT takayamatetsuji influenceofvariousdistractionspriortouppergastrointestinalendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy |