Cargando…

The influence of various distractions prior to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND: Although many patients still have anxiety about upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy, there have been few reports on the influence of distractions for a person who is going to undergo upper GI endoscopy soon. This study was a prospective randomized controlled study investigating the inf...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sogabe, Masahiro, Okahisa, Toshiya, Adachi, Yuka, Takehara, Masanori, Hamada, Shinichi, Okazaki, Jun, Fujino, Yasuteru, Fukuya, Akira, Kagemoto, Kaizo, Hirao, Akihiro, Okamoto, Koichi, Nakasono, Masahiko, Takayama, Tetsuji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6114187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30157771
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-018-0859-y
_version_ 1783351142250446848
author Sogabe, Masahiro
Okahisa, Toshiya
Adachi, Yuka
Takehara, Masanori
Hamada, Shinichi
Okazaki, Jun
Fujino, Yasuteru
Fukuya, Akira
Kagemoto, Kaizo
Hirao, Akihiro
Okamoto, Koichi
Nakasono, Masahiko
Takayama, Tetsuji
author_facet Sogabe, Masahiro
Okahisa, Toshiya
Adachi, Yuka
Takehara, Masanori
Hamada, Shinichi
Okazaki, Jun
Fujino, Yasuteru
Fukuya, Akira
Kagemoto, Kaizo
Hirao, Akihiro
Okamoto, Koichi
Nakasono, Masahiko
Takayama, Tetsuji
author_sort Sogabe, Masahiro
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although many patients still have anxiety about upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy, there have been few reports on the influence of distractions for a person who is going to undergo upper GI endoscopy soon. This study was a prospective randomized controlled study investigating the influence of distractions, such as auditive and visual distractions using subjective and objective assessments including autonomic nervous function prior to upper GI endoscopy. METHODS: 206 subjects who underwent upper GI endoscopy as regular health check-ups were divided randomly into 4 groups prior to upper GI endoscopy; group 1 (control group), group 2 (auditive group), group 3 (visual group), and group 4 (combination group). We measured vital signs, autonomic nervous function, profile of mood state (POMS), and the impression for upper GI endoscopy pre- and post-distraction in the 4 groups. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in vital signs between 5 and 15 min after sitting in group 1, however, several vital signs in all distraction groups improved significantly after distraction (Pulse rate (P): p <  0.001 in group 4; blood pressure: p <  0.05 in group 2, 3, 4) and the rate of decrease in P and diastolic blood pressure was highest in group 4 (p <  0.001). Several scores of POMS and the impression for upper GI endoscopy post-distraction improved significantly compared to pre-distraction between distraction groups and the satisfaction for distraction was highest in group 4 (p <  0.01). Regarding autonomic nerve function, the low- frequency power/ high- frequency power ratio post-distraction was significantly lower than that pre-distraction in all distraction groups (p <  0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although auditive distraction alone and visual distraction alone were effective, a combination distraction was more effective than any other distraction by subjective and objective assessments. These distractions, which were simple and safe, may play an assistive role in the stability of physical and psychological conditions prior to upper GI endoscopy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN000022801. Registered on 10 July 2016.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6114187
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61141872018-09-04 The influence of various distractions prior to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled study Sogabe, Masahiro Okahisa, Toshiya Adachi, Yuka Takehara, Masanori Hamada, Shinichi Okazaki, Jun Fujino, Yasuteru Fukuya, Akira Kagemoto, Kaizo Hirao, Akihiro Okamoto, Koichi Nakasono, Masahiko Takayama, Tetsuji BMC Gastroenterol Research Article BACKGROUND: Although many patients still have anxiety about upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy, there have been few reports on the influence of distractions for a person who is going to undergo upper GI endoscopy soon. This study was a prospective randomized controlled study investigating the influence of distractions, such as auditive and visual distractions using subjective and objective assessments including autonomic nervous function prior to upper GI endoscopy. METHODS: 206 subjects who underwent upper GI endoscopy as regular health check-ups were divided randomly into 4 groups prior to upper GI endoscopy; group 1 (control group), group 2 (auditive group), group 3 (visual group), and group 4 (combination group). We measured vital signs, autonomic nervous function, profile of mood state (POMS), and the impression for upper GI endoscopy pre- and post-distraction in the 4 groups. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in vital signs between 5 and 15 min after sitting in group 1, however, several vital signs in all distraction groups improved significantly after distraction (Pulse rate (P): p <  0.001 in group 4; blood pressure: p <  0.05 in group 2, 3, 4) and the rate of decrease in P and diastolic blood pressure was highest in group 4 (p <  0.001). Several scores of POMS and the impression for upper GI endoscopy post-distraction improved significantly compared to pre-distraction between distraction groups and the satisfaction for distraction was highest in group 4 (p <  0.01). Regarding autonomic nerve function, the low- frequency power/ high- frequency power ratio post-distraction was significantly lower than that pre-distraction in all distraction groups (p <  0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although auditive distraction alone and visual distraction alone were effective, a combination distraction was more effective than any other distraction by subjective and objective assessments. These distractions, which were simple and safe, may play an assistive role in the stability of physical and psychological conditions prior to upper GI endoscopy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN000022801. Registered on 10 July 2016. BioMed Central 2018-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6114187/ /pubmed/30157771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-018-0859-y Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sogabe, Masahiro
Okahisa, Toshiya
Adachi, Yuka
Takehara, Masanori
Hamada, Shinichi
Okazaki, Jun
Fujino, Yasuteru
Fukuya, Akira
Kagemoto, Kaizo
Hirao, Akihiro
Okamoto, Koichi
Nakasono, Masahiko
Takayama, Tetsuji
The influence of various distractions prior to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled study
title The influence of various distractions prior to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled study
title_full The influence of various distractions prior to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled study
title_fullStr The influence of various distractions prior to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled study
title_full_unstemmed The influence of various distractions prior to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled study
title_short The influence of various distractions prior to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled study
title_sort influence of various distractions prior to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6114187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30157771
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-018-0859-y
work_keys_str_mv AT sogabemasahiro theinfluenceofvariousdistractionspriortouppergastrointestinalendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT okahisatoshiya theinfluenceofvariousdistractionspriortouppergastrointestinalendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT adachiyuka theinfluenceofvariousdistractionspriortouppergastrointestinalendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT takeharamasanori theinfluenceofvariousdistractionspriortouppergastrointestinalendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT hamadashinichi theinfluenceofvariousdistractionspriortouppergastrointestinalendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT okazakijun theinfluenceofvariousdistractionspriortouppergastrointestinalendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT fujinoyasuteru theinfluenceofvariousdistractionspriortouppergastrointestinalendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT fukuyaakira theinfluenceofvariousdistractionspriortouppergastrointestinalendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT kagemotokaizo theinfluenceofvariousdistractionspriortouppergastrointestinalendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT hiraoakihiro theinfluenceofvariousdistractionspriortouppergastrointestinalendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT okamotokoichi theinfluenceofvariousdistractionspriortouppergastrointestinalendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT nakasonomasahiko theinfluenceofvariousdistractionspriortouppergastrointestinalendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT takayamatetsuji theinfluenceofvariousdistractionspriortouppergastrointestinalendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT sogabemasahiro influenceofvariousdistractionspriortouppergastrointestinalendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT okahisatoshiya influenceofvariousdistractionspriortouppergastrointestinalendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT adachiyuka influenceofvariousdistractionspriortouppergastrointestinalendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT takeharamasanori influenceofvariousdistractionspriortouppergastrointestinalendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT hamadashinichi influenceofvariousdistractionspriortouppergastrointestinalendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT okazakijun influenceofvariousdistractionspriortouppergastrointestinalendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT fujinoyasuteru influenceofvariousdistractionspriortouppergastrointestinalendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT fukuyaakira influenceofvariousdistractionspriortouppergastrointestinalendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT kagemotokaizo influenceofvariousdistractionspriortouppergastrointestinalendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT hiraoakihiro influenceofvariousdistractionspriortouppergastrointestinalendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT okamotokoichi influenceofvariousdistractionspriortouppergastrointestinalendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT nakasonomasahiko influenceofvariousdistractionspriortouppergastrointestinalendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT takayamatetsuji influenceofvariousdistractionspriortouppergastrointestinalendoscopyaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledstudy