Cargando…

Validation of a Visual Analogue Scale to measure the subjective perception of orgasmic intensity in females: The Orgasmometer-F

The female orgasm represents one of the most complex functions in the field of human sexuality. The conjunction of the anatomical, physiological, psycho-relational and socio-cultural components contributes to make the female orgasm still partly unclear. The female orgasmic experience, its correlates...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mollaioli, Daniele, Di Sante, Stefania, Limoncin, Erika, Ciocca, Giacomo, Gravina, Giovanni Luca, Maseroli, Elisa, Fanni, Egidia, Vignozzi, Linda, Maggi, Mario, Lenzi, Andrea, Jannini, Emmanuele A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6114295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30157203
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202076
_version_ 1783351166761959424
author Mollaioli, Daniele
Di Sante, Stefania
Limoncin, Erika
Ciocca, Giacomo
Gravina, Giovanni Luca
Maseroli, Elisa
Fanni, Egidia
Vignozzi, Linda
Maggi, Mario
Lenzi, Andrea
Jannini, Emmanuele A.
author_facet Mollaioli, Daniele
Di Sante, Stefania
Limoncin, Erika
Ciocca, Giacomo
Gravina, Giovanni Luca
Maseroli, Elisa
Fanni, Egidia
Vignozzi, Linda
Maggi, Mario
Lenzi, Andrea
Jannini, Emmanuele A.
author_sort Mollaioli, Daniele
collection PubMed
description The female orgasm represents one of the most complex functions in the field of human sexuality. The conjunction of the anatomical, physiological, psycho-relational and socio-cultural components contributes to make the female orgasm still partly unclear. The female orgasmic experience, its correlates and the relation with sexual desire, arousal and lubrication as predictors are highly debated in scientific community. In this context, little is known about the impact of female sexual dysfunction (SD) on sexual pleasure expressed by subjective orgasmic intensity, and there are no suitable psychometric tools suited to investigate this dimension. Thus, we validate, in female subjects, a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) that we named Orgasmometer-F, to verify if SD is accompanied by a lower perceived orgasmic intensity. A total of 526 women, recruited through a web-based platform and from sexological outpatient clinic, were enrolled in the study. They were divided into, on the basis of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) score in two groups: 1) 112women suffering from SD, (SD Group); and 2) 414 sexually healthy women (Control Group). The participants were requested to fill out the Orgasmometer-F, recording orgasmic intensity on a Likert scale from 0 (absence of orgasmic intensity) to 10 (maximum orgasmic intensity experienced). Women with SD experienced significantly lower orgasmic intensity than controls, as measured by the Orgasmometer-F (p < 0.0001). Interestingly, masturbatory frequency was positively correlated with orgasmic intensity, as were the lubrication, orgasm and sexual satisfaction domains of the FSFI. The Orgasmometer-F was well understood, had a good test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.93) and a high AUC in differentiating between women with and without sexual dysfunction (AUC = 0.9; p < 0.0001). The ROC curve analysis showed that a cut-off <5 had 86.5% sensitivity (95% CI 82,8–89,6), 80.4% specificity (95% CI 71.8–87.3), 75.4% positive predictive value (PPV) and 89.5% negative predictive value (NPV). In conclusion, the Orgasmometer-F, a new psychometrically sound tool for measuring orgasmic intensity in female population, demonstrated that SD impair orgasmic intensity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6114295
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61142952018-09-17 Validation of a Visual Analogue Scale to measure the subjective perception of orgasmic intensity in females: The Orgasmometer-F Mollaioli, Daniele Di Sante, Stefania Limoncin, Erika Ciocca, Giacomo Gravina, Giovanni Luca Maseroli, Elisa Fanni, Egidia Vignozzi, Linda Maggi, Mario Lenzi, Andrea Jannini, Emmanuele A. PLoS One Research Article The female orgasm represents one of the most complex functions in the field of human sexuality. The conjunction of the anatomical, physiological, psycho-relational and socio-cultural components contributes to make the female orgasm still partly unclear. The female orgasmic experience, its correlates and the relation with sexual desire, arousal and lubrication as predictors are highly debated in scientific community. In this context, little is known about the impact of female sexual dysfunction (SD) on sexual pleasure expressed by subjective orgasmic intensity, and there are no suitable psychometric tools suited to investigate this dimension. Thus, we validate, in female subjects, a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) that we named Orgasmometer-F, to verify if SD is accompanied by a lower perceived orgasmic intensity. A total of 526 women, recruited through a web-based platform and from sexological outpatient clinic, were enrolled in the study. They were divided into, on the basis of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) score in two groups: 1) 112women suffering from SD, (SD Group); and 2) 414 sexually healthy women (Control Group). The participants were requested to fill out the Orgasmometer-F, recording orgasmic intensity on a Likert scale from 0 (absence of orgasmic intensity) to 10 (maximum orgasmic intensity experienced). Women with SD experienced significantly lower orgasmic intensity than controls, as measured by the Orgasmometer-F (p < 0.0001). Interestingly, masturbatory frequency was positively correlated with orgasmic intensity, as were the lubrication, orgasm and sexual satisfaction domains of the FSFI. The Orgasmometer-F was well understood, had a good test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.93) and a high AUC in differentiating between women with and without sexual dysfunction (AUC = 0.9; p < 0.0001). The ROC curve analysis showed that a cut-off <5 had 86.5% sensitivity (95% CI 82,8–89,6), 80.4% specificity (95% CI 71.8–87.3), 75.4% positive predictive value (PPV) and 89.5% negative predictive value (NPV). In conclusion, the Orgasmometer-F, a new psychometrically sound tool for measuring orgasmic intensity in female population, demonstrated that SD impair orgasmic intensity. Public Library of Science 2018-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6114295/ /pubmed/30157203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202076 Text en © 2018 Mollaioli et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mollaioli, Daniele
Di Sante, Stefania
Limoncin, Erika
Ciocca, Giacomo
Gravina, Giovanni Luca
Maseroli, Elisa
Fanni, Egidia
Vignozzi, Linda
Maggi, Mario
Lenzi, Andrea
Jannini, Emmanuele A.
Validation of a Visual Analogue Scale to measure the subjective perception of orgasmic intensity in females: The Orgasmometer-F
title Validation of a Visual Analogue Scale to measure the subjective perception of orgasmic intensity in females: The Orgasmometer-F
title_full Validation of a Visual Analogue Scale to measure the subjective perception of orgasmic intensity in females: The Orgasmometer-F
title_fullStr Validation of a Visual Analogue Scale to measure the subjective perception of orgasmic intensity in females: The Orgasmometer-F
title_full_unstemmed Validation of a Visual Analogue Scale to measure the subjective perception of orgasmic intensity in females: The Orgasmometer-F
title_short Validation of a Visual Analogue Scale to measure the subjective perception of orgasmic intensity in females: The Orgasmometer-F
title_sort validation of a visual analogue scale to measure the subjective perception of orgasmic intensity in females: the orgasmometer-f
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6114295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30157203
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202076
work_keys_str_mv AT mollaiolidaniele validationofavisualanaloguescaletomeasurethesubjectiveperceptionoforgasmicintensityinfemalestheorgasmometerf
AT disantestefania validationofavisualanaloguescaletomeasurethesubjectiveperceptionoforgasmicintensityinfemalestheorgasmometerf
AT limoncinerika validationofavisualanaloguescaletomeasurethesubjectiveperceptionoforgasmicintensityinfemalestheorgasmometerf
AT cioccagiacomo validationofavisualanaloguescaletomeasurethesubjectiveperceptionoforgasmicintensityinfemalestheorgasmometerf
AT gravinagiovanniluca validationofavisualanaloguescaletomeasurethesubjectiveperceptionoforgasmicintensityinfemalestheorgasmometerf
AT maserolielisa validationofavisualanaloguescaletomeasurethesubjectiveperceptionoforgasmicintensityinfemalestheorgasmometerf
AT fanniegidia validationofavisualanaloguescaletomeasurethesubjectiveperceptionoforgasmicintensityinfemalestheorgasmometerf
AT vignozzilinda validationofavisualanaloguescaletomeasurethesubjectiveperceptionoforgasmicintensityinfemalestheorgasmometerf
AT maggimario validationofavisualanaloguescaletomeasurethesubjectiveperceptionoforgasmicintensityinfemalestheorgasmometerf
AT lenziandrea validationofavisualanaloguescaletomeasurethesubjectiveperceptionoforgasmicintensityinfemalestheorgasmometerf
AT janniniemmanuelea validationofavisualanaloguescaletomeasurethesubjectiveperceptionoforgasmicintensityinfemalestheorgasmometerf