Cargando…

A qualitative study of persons who inject drugs but who have never helped others with first injections: how their views on helping contrast with the views of persons who have helped with first injections, and implications for interventions

BACKGROUND: Transitioning from non-injection to injection drug use dramatically escalates health risks. Evidence suggests that people who inject drugs (PWID) help in a majority of others’ first injections, yet these helpers represent only a minority of experienced PWID. Recent research has provided...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barnes, David M., Des Jarlais, Don C., Wolff, Margaret, Feelemyer, Jonathan, Tross, Susan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6114536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30153826
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12954-018-0250-x
_version_ 1783351212492455936
author Barnes, David M.
Des Jarlais, Don C.
Wolff, Margaret
Feelemyer, Jonathan
Tross, Susan
author_facet Barnes, David M.
Des Jarlais, Don C.
Wolff, Margaret
Feelemyer, Jonathan
Tross, Susan
author_sort Barnes, David M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Transitioning from non-injection to injection drug use dramatically escalates health risks. Evidence suggests that people who inject drugs (PWID) help in a majority of others’ first injections, yet these helpers represent only a minority of experienced PWID. Recent research has provided insight into this helping process, as reported by helpers. PWID who have never helped, although the majority of PWID, have not previously been the focus of study. To address this gap, we give primary voice to non-helpers’ perspectives on the helping process, while also comparing their views with persons in our sample who have helped with first injections. Finally, we consider how non-helpers’ perspectives can inform harm reduction interventions to reduce, or make safer, initiation into injecting drug use. METHODS: We conducted audio-recorded, qualitative interviews with 23 current opioid injectors on Staten Island, NY, where the opioid epidemic is pronounced. Seventeen had never helped with first injections and 6 had. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and three coders used a consensus-developed codebook to code all interviews. Framework analysis was used to identify overarching themes. RESULTS: We identified three key themes in non-helpers’ discourse around not helping: altruistic motivations to prevent immediate and delayed harms to individuals injecting for the first time; inhibition due to negative assessments of their own injecting skills; and absolutist ethical convictions against helping. Non-helpers differed from helpers on each theme. CONCLUSIONS: Because most PWID have never helped with first injections, their perspectives on helping warrant consideration and can inform harm reduction interventions to reduce, or make safer, transitions to injection drug use. Their perspectives can be used to broaden the factors PWID consider around questions of promoting injection and helping with others’ first injections, including considerations of the moral issues involved in choosing to help or not to help.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6114536
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61145362018-09-04 A qualitative study of persons who inject drugs but who have never helped others with first injections: how their views on helping contrast with the views of persons who have helped with first injections, and implications for interventions Barnes, David M. Des Jarlais, Don C. Wolff, Margaret Feelemyer, Jonathan Tross, Susan Harm Reduct J Research BACKGROUND: Transitioning from non-injection to injection drug use dramatically escalates health risks. Evidence suggests that people who inject drugs (PWID) help in a majority of others’ first injections, yet these helpers represent only a minority of experienced PWID. Recent research has provided insight into this helping process, as reported by helpers. PWID who have never helped, although the majority of PWID, have not previously been the focus of study. To address this gap, we give primary voice to non-helpers’ perspectives on the helping process, while also comparing their views with persons in our sample who have helped with first injections. Finally, we consider how non-helpers’ perspectives can inform harm reduction interventions to reduce, or make safer, initiation into injecting drug use. METHODS: We conducted audio-recorded, qualitative interviews with 23 current opioid injectors on Staten Island, NY, where the opioid epidemic is pronounced. Seventeen had never helped with first injections and 6 had. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and three coders used a consensus-developed codebook to code all interviews. Framework analysis was used to identify overarching themes. RESULTS: We identified three key themes in non-helpers’ discourse around not helping: altruistic motivations to prevent immediate and delayed harms to individuals injecting for the first time; inhibition due to negative assessments of their own injecting skills; and absolutist ethical convictions against helping. Non-helpers differed from helpers on each theme. CONCLUSIONS: Because most PWID have never helped with first injections, their perspectives on helping warrant consideration and can inform harm reduction interventions to reduce, or make safer, transitions to injection drug use. Their perspectives can be used to broaden the factors PWID consider around questions of promoting injection and helping with others’ first injections, including considerations of the moral issues involved in choosing to help or not to help. BioMed Central 2018-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6114536/ /pubmed/30153826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12954-018-0250-x Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Barnes, David M.
Des Jarlais, Don C.
Wolff, Margaret
Feelemyer, Jonathan
Tross, Susan
A qualitative study of persons who inject drugs but who have never helped others with first injections: how their views on helping contrast with the views of persons who have helped with first injections, and implications for interventions
title A qualitative study of persons who inject drugs but who have never helped others with first injections: how their views on helping contrast with the views of persons who have helped with first injections, and implications for interventions
title_full A qualitative study of persons who inject drugs but who have never helped others with first injections: how their views on helping contrast with the views of persons who have helped with first injections, and implications for interventions
title_fullStr A qualitative study of persons who inject drugs but who have never helped others with first injections: how their views on helping contrast with the views of persons who have helped with first injections, and implications for interventions
title_full_unstemmed A qualitative study of persons who inject drugs but who have never helped others with first injections: how their views on helping contrast with the views of persons who have helped with first injections, and implications for interventions
title_short A qualitative study of persons who inject drugs but who have never helped others with first injections: how their views on helping contrast with the views of persons who have helped with first injections, and implications for interventions
title_sort qualitative study of persons who inject drugs but who have never helped others with first injections: how their views on helping contrast with the views of persons who have helped with first injections, and implications for interventions
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6114536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30153826
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12954-018-0250-x
work_keys_str_mv AT barnesdavidm aqualitativestudyofpersonswhoinjectdrugsbutwhohaveneverhelpedotherswithfirstinjectionshowtheirviewsonhelpingcontrastwiththeviewsofpersonswhohavehelpedwithfirstinjectionsandimplicationsforinterventions
AT desjarlaisdonc aqualitativestudyofpersonswhoinjectdrugsbutwhohaveneverhelpedotherswithfirstinjectionshowtheirviewsonhelpingcontrastwiththeviewsofpersonswhohavehelpedwithfirstinjectionsandimplicationsforinterventions
AT wolffmargaret aqualitativestudyofpersonswhoinjectdrugsbutwhohaveneverhelpedotherswithfirstinjectionshowtheirviewsonhelpingcontrastwiththeviewsofpersonswhohavehelpedwithfirstinjectionsandimplicationsforinterventions
AT feelemyerjonathan aqualitativestudyofpersonswhoinjectdrugsbutwhohaveneverhelpedotherswithfirstinjectionshowtheirviewsonhelpingcontrastwiththeviewsofpersonswhohavehelpedwithfirstinjectionsandimplicationsforinterventions
AT trosssusan aqualitativestudyofpersonswhoinjectdrugsbutwhohaveneverhelpedotherswithfirstinjectionshowtheirviewsonhelpingcontrastwiththeviewsofpersonswhohavehelpedwithfirstinjectionsandimplicationsforinterventions
AT barnesdavidm qualitativestudyofpersonswhoinjectdrugsbutwhohaveneverhelpedotherswithfirstinjectionshowtheirviewsonhelpingcontrastwiththeviewsofpersonswhohavehelpedwithfirstinjectionsandimplicationsforinterventions
AT desjarlaisdonc qualitativestudyofpersonswhoinjectdrugsbutwhohaveneverhelpedotherswithfirstinjectionshowtheirviewsonhelpingcontrastwiththeviewsofpersonswhohavehelpedwithfirstinjectionsandimplicationsforinterventions
AT wolffmargaret qualitativestudyofpersonswhoinjectdrugsbutwhohaveneverhelpedotherswithfirstinjectionshowtheirviewsonhelpingcontrastwiththeviewsofpersonswhohavehelpedwithfirstinjectionsandimplicationsforinterventions
AT feelemyerjonathan qualitativestudyofpersonswhoinjectdrugsbutwhohaveneverhelpedotherswithfirstinjectionshowtheirviewsonhelpingcontrastwiththeviewsofpersonswhohavehelpedwithfirstinjectionsandimplicationsforinterventions
AT trosssusan qualitativestudyofpersonswhoinjectdrugsbutwhohaveneverhelpedotherswithfirstinjectionshowtheirviewsonhelpingcontrastwiththeviewsofpersonswhohavehelpedwithfirstinjectionsandimplicationsforinterventions