Cargando…

Re-evaluation of the stroke prognostication using age and NIH Stroke Scale index (SPAN-100 index) in IVT patients — the-SPAN 100(65) index

BACKGROUND: The SPAN-100 index adds patient age and baseline NIHSS-score and was introduced to predict clinical outcome after acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Even with high NIHSS-scores younger patients cannot reach a SPAN-100-positive status (index ≥100). We aimed to evaluate the SPAN-100 index among...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Möbius, Cornelia, Blinzler, Christian, Schwab, Stefan, Köhrmann, Martin, Breuer, Lorenz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6114699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30157792
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-018-1126-0
_version_ 1783351240627847168
author Möbius, Cornelia
Blinzler, Christian
Schwab, Stefan
Köhrmann, Martin
Breuer, Lorenz
author_facet Möbius, Cornelia
Blinzler, Christian
Schwab, Stefan
Köhrmann, Martin
Breuer, Lorenz
author_sort Möbius, Cornelia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The SPAN-100 index adds patient age and baseline NIHSS-score and was introduced to predict clinical outcome after acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Even with high NIHSS-scores younger patients cannot reach a SPAN-100-positive status (index ≥100). We aimed to evaluate the SPAN-100 index among a large, contemporary cohort of i.v.-thrombolysed AIS-patients and exclusively among older patients who can at least theoretically achieve SPAN-100-positivity. METHODS: The SPAN-100 index was applied to AIS-patients receiving i.v.-thrombolysis (IVT) in our institution between 01/2006 and 01/2013. Clinical outcome and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage rates were compared between SPAN-100-positive and -negative patients. Furthermore we excluded patients < 65 years, without any theoretical chance to achieve SPAN-100-positivity, and re-evaluated the index (SPAN(65)–100 index). RESULTS: SPAN-100-positive IVT-patients (124/1002) had a 9-fold increased risk for unfavorable outcome compared to SPAN-negative patients (OR 9.39; 95% CI 5.87–15.02; p <  0.001). The odds ratio for mortality was 7.48 (95% CI 4.90–11.43; p <  0.001). No association was found between SPAN-100-positivity and sICH-incidence (OR 0.88; 95% CI 0.31–2.53; p = 0.810). SPAN(65)–100-positivity (124/741) was associated with an 8-fold increased risk for unfavorable outcome (OR 7.6; 95% CI 4.71–12.22; p <  0.001) but not associated with higher sICH-rates (OR 0.86; 95% CI 0.29–2.53; p <  0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Also for patients ≥65 years the SPAN-100 index can be a fast, easy method to predict clinical outcome of IVT-patients in everyday practice. However, it should not be used to determine the risk of sICH after IVT. Based on a SPAN-positive status IVT should not be withheld from AIS-patients merely because of feared sICH-complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6114699
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61146992018-09-04 Re-evaluation of the stroke prognostication using age and NIH Stroke Scale index (SPAN-100 index) in IVT patients — the-SPAN 100(65) index Möbius, Cornelia Blinzler, Christian Schwab, Stefan Köhrmann, Martin Breuer, Lorenz BMC Neurol Research Article BACKGROUND: The SPAN-100 index adds patient age and baseline NIHSS-score and was introduced to predict clinical outcome after acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Even with high NIHSS-scores younger patients cannot reach a SPAN-100-positive status (index ≥100). We aimed to evaluate the SPAN-100 index among a large, contemporary cohort of i.v.-thrombolysed AIS-patients and exclusively among older patients who can at least theoretically achieve SPAN-100-positivity. METHODS: The SPAN-100 index was applied to AIS-patients receiving i.v.-thrombolysis (IVT) in our institution between 01/2006 and 01/2013. Clinical outcome and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage rates were compared between SPAN-100-positive and -negative patients. Furthermore we excluded patients < 65 years, without any theoretical chance to achieve SPAN-100-positivity, and re-evaluated the index (SPAN(65)–100 index). RESULTS: SPAN-100-positive IVT-patients (124/1002) had a 9-fold increased risk for unfavorable outcome compared to SPAN-negative patients (OR 9.39; 95% CI 5.87–15.02; p <  0.001). The odds ratio for mortality was 7.48 (95% CI 4.90–11.43; p <  0.001). No association was found between SPAN-100-positivity and sICH-incidence (OR 0.88; 95% CI 0.31–2.53; p = 0.810). SPAN(65)–100-positivity (124/741) was associated with an 8-fold increased risk for unfavorable outcome (OR 7.6; 95% CI 4.71–12.22; p <  0.001) but not associated with higher sICH-rates (OR 0.86; 95% CI 0.29–2.53; p <  0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Also for patients ≥65 years the SPAN-100 index can be a fast, easy method to predict clinical outcome of IVT-patients in everyday practice. However, it should not be used to determine the risk of sICH after IVT. Based on a SPAN-positive status IVT should not be withheld from AIS-patients merely because of feared sICH-complications. BioMed Central 2018-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6114699/ /pubmed/30157792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-018-1126-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Möbius, Cornelia
Blinzler, Christian
Schwab, Stefan
Köhrmann, Martin
Breuer, Lorenz
Re-evaluation of the stroke prognostication using age and NIH Stroke Scale index (SPAN-100 index) in IVT patients — the-SPAN 100(65) index
title Re-evaluation of the stroke prognostication using age and NIH Stroke Scale index (SPAN-100 index) in IVT patients — the-SPAN 100(65) index
title_full Re-evaluation of the stroke prognostication using age and NIH Stroke Scale index (SPAN-100 index) in IVT patients — the-SPAN 100(65) index
title_fullStr Re-evaluation of the stroke prognostication using age and NIH Stroke Scale index (SPAN-100 index) in IVT patients — the-SPAN 100(65) index
title_full_unstemmed Re-evaluation of the stroke prognostication using age and NIH Stroke Scale index (SPAN-100 index) in IVT patients — the-SPAN 100(65) index
title_short Re-evaluation of the stroke prognostication using age and NIH Stroke Scale index (SPAN-100 index) in IVT patients — the-SPAN 100(65) index
title_sort re-evaluation of the stroke prognostication using age and nih stroke scale index (span-100 index) in ivt patients — the-span 100(65) index
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6114699/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30157792
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-018-1126-0
work_keys_str_mv AT mobiuscornelia reevaluationofthestrokeprognosticationusingageandnihstrokescaleindexspan100indexinivtpatientsthespan10065index
AT blinzlerchristian reevaluationofthestrokeprognosticationusingageandnihstrokescaleindexspan100indexinivtpatientsthespan10065index
AT schwabstefan reevaluationofthestrokeprognosticationusingageandnihstrokescaleindexspan100indexinivtpatientsthespan10065index
AT kohrmannmartin reevaluationofthestrokeprognosticationusingageandnihstrokescaleindexspan100indexinivtpatientsthespan10065index
AT breuerlorenz reevaluationofthestrokeprognosticationusingageandnihstrokescaleindexspan100indexinivtpatientsthespan10065index