Cargando…
Use of the prognostic biomarker suPAR in the emergency department improves risk stratification but has no effect on mortality: a cluster-randomized clinical trial (TRIAGE III)
BACKGROUND: Risk stratification of patients in the emergency department can be strengthened using prognostic biomarkers, but the impact on patient prognosis is unknown. The aim of the TRIAGE III trial was to investigate whether the introduction of the prognostic and nonspecific biomarker: soluble ur...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6114851/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30153859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-018-0539-5 |
_version_ | 1783351271509458944 |
---|---|
author | Schultz, Martin Rasmussen, Line Jee Hartmann Andersen, Malene H. Stefansson, Jakob S. Falkentoft, Alexander C. Alstrup, Morten Sandø, Andreas Holle, Sarah L. K. Meyer, Jeppe Törnkvist, Peter B. S. Høi-Hansen, Thomas Kjøller, Erik Jensen, Birgitte Nybo Lind, Morten Ravn, Lisbet Kallemose, Thomas Lange, Theis Køber, Lars Rasmussen, Lars Simon Eugen-Olsen, Jesper Iversen, Kasper Karmark |
author_facet | Schultz, Martin Rasmussen, Line Jee Hartmann Andersen, Malene H. Stefansson, Jakob S. Falkentoft, Alexander C. Alstrup, Morten Sandø, Andreas Holle, Sarah L. K. Meyer, Jeppe Törnkvist, Peter B. S. Høi-Hansen, Thomas Kjøller, Erik Jensen, Birgitte Nybo Lind, Morten Ravn, Lisbet Kallemose, Thomas Lange, Theis Køber, Lars Rasmussen, Lars Simon Eugen-Olsen, Jesper Iversen, Kasper Karmark |
author_sort | Schultz, Martin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Risk stratification of patients in the emergency department can be strengthened using prognostic biomarkers, but the impact on patient prognosis is unknown. The aim of the TRIAGE III trial was to investigate whether the introduction of the prognostic and nonspecific biomarker: soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) for risk stratification in the emergency department reduces mortality in acutely admitted patients. METHODS: The TRIAGE III trial was a cluster-randomized interventional trial conducted at emergency departments in the Capitol Region of Denmark. Eligible hospitals were required to have an emergency department with an intake of acute medical and surgical patients and no previous access to suPAR measurement. Three emergency departments were randomized; one withdrew shortly after the trial began. The inclusion period was from January through June of 2016 consisting of twelve cluster-periods of 3-weeks alternating between intervention and control and a subsequent follow-up of ten months. Patients were allocated to the intervention if they arrived in interventional periods, where suPAR measurement was routinely analysed at arrival. In the control periods suPAR measurement was not performed. The main outcome was all-cause mortality 10 months after arrival of the last patient in the inclusion period. Secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality. RESULTS: The trial enrolled a consecutive cohort of 16,801 acutely admitted patients; all were included in the analyses. The intervention group consisted of 6 cluster periods with 8900 patients and the control group consisted of 6 cluster periods with 7901 patients. After a median follow-up of 362 days, death occurred in 1241 patients (13.9%) in the intervention group and in 1126 patients (14.3%) in the control group. The weighted Cox model found a hazard ratio of 0.97 (95% confidence interval, 0.89 to 1.07; p = 0.57). Analysis of all subgroups and of 30-day all-cause mortality showed similar results. CONCLUSIONS: The TRIAGE III trial found no effect of introducing the nonspecific and prognostic biomarker suPAR in emergency departments on short- or long-term all-cause mortality among acutely admitted patients. Further research is required to evaluate how prognostic biomarkers can be implemented in routine clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02643459. Registered 31 December 2015. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13049-018-0539-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6114851 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61148512018-09-04 Use of the prognostic biomarker suPAR in the emergency department improves risk stratification but has no effect on mortality: a cluster-randomized clinical trial (TRIAGE III) Schultz, Martin Rasmussen, Line Jee Hartmann Andersen, Malene H. Stefansson, Jakob S. Falkentoft, Alexander C. Alstrup, Morten Sandø, Andreas Holle, Sarah L. K. Meyer, Jeppe Törnkvist, Peter B. S. Høi-Hansen, Thomas Kjøller, Erik Jensen, Birgitte Nybo Lind, Morten Ravn, Lisbet Kallemose, Thomas Lange, Theis Køber, Lars Rasmussen, Lars Simon Eugen-Olsen, Jesper Iversen, Kasper Karmark Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Risk stratification of patients in the emergency department can be strengthened using prognostic biomarkers, but the impact on patient prognosis is unknown. The aim of the TRIAGE III trial was to investigate whether the introduction of the prognostic and nonspecific biomarker: soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) for risk stratification in the emergency department reduces mortality in acutely admitted patients. METHODS: The TRIAGE III trial was a cluster-randomized interventional trial conducted at emergency departments in the Capitol Region of Denmark. Eligible hospitals were required to have an emergency department with an intake of acute medical and surgical patients and no previous access to suPAR measurement. Three emergency departments were randomized; one withdrew shortly after the trial began. The inclusion period was from January through June of 2016 consisting of twelve cluster-periods of 3-weeks alternating between intervention and control and a subsequent follow-up of ten months. Patients were allocated to the intervention if they arrived in interventional periods, where suPAR measurement was routinely analysed at arrival. In the control periods suPAR measurement was not performed. The main outcome was all-cause mortality 10 months after arrival of the last patient in the inclusion period. Secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality. RESULTS: The trial enrolled a consecutive cohort of 16,801 acutely admitted patients; all were included in the analyses. The intervention group consisted of 6 cluster periods with 8900 patients and the control group consisted of 6 cluster periods with 7901 patients. After a median follow-up of 362 days, death occurred in 1241 patients (13.9%) in the intervention group and in 1126 patients (14.3%) in the control group. The weighted Cox model found a hazard ratio of 0.97 (95% confidence interval, 0.89 to 1.07; p = 0.57). Analysis of all subgroups and of 30-day all-cause mortality showed similar results. CONCLUSIONS: The TRIAGE III trial found no effect of introducing the nonspecific and prognostic biomarker suPAR in emergency departments on short- or long-term all-cause mortality among acutely admitted patients. Further research is required to evaluate how prognostic biomarkers can be implemented in routine clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02643459. Registered 31 December 2015. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13049-018-0539-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6114851/ /pubmed/30153859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-018-0539-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Schultz, Martin Rasmussen, Line Jee Hartmann Andersen, Malene H. Stefansson, Jakob S. Falkentoft, Alexander C. Alstrup, Morten Sandø, Andreas Holle, Sarah L. K. Meyer, Jeppe Törnkvist, Peter B. S. Høi-Hansen, Thomas Kjøller, Erik Jensen, Birgitte Nybo Lind, Morten Ravn, Lisbet Kallemose, Thomas Lange, Theis Køber, Lars Rasmussen, Lars Simon Eugen-Olsen, Jesper Iversen, Kasper Karmark Use of the prognostic biomarker suPAR in the emergency department improves risk stratification but has no effect on mortality: a cluster-randomized clinical trial (TRIAGE III) |
title | Use of the prognostic biomarker suPAR in the emergency department improves risk stratification but has no effect on mortality: a cluster-randomized clinical trial (TRIAGE III) |
title_full | Use of the prognostic biomarker suPAR in the emergency department improves risk stratification but has no effect on mortality: a cluster-randomized clinical trial (TRIAGE III) |
title_fullStr | Use of the prognostic biomarker suPAR in the emergency department improves risk stratification but has no effect on mortality: a cluster-randomized clinical trial (TRIAGE III) |
title_full_unstemmed | Use of the prognostic biomarker suPAR in the emergency department improves risk stratification but has no effect on mortality: a cluster-randomized clinical trial (TRIAGE III) |
title_short | Use of the prognostic biomarker suPAR in the emergency department improves risk stratification but has no effect on mortality: a cluster-randomized clinical trial (TRIAGE III) |
title_sort | use of the prognostic biomarker supar in the emergency department improves risk stratification but has no effect on mortality: a cluster-randomized clinical trial (triage iii) |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6114851/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30153859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-018-0539-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schultzmartin useoftheprognosticbiomarkersuparintheemergencydepartmentimprovesriskstratificationbuthasnoeffectonmortalityaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrialtriageiii AT rasmussenlinejeehartmann useoftheprognosticbiomarkersuparintheemergencydepartmentimprovesriskstratificationbuthasnoeffectonmortalityaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrialtriageiii AT andersenmaleneh useoftheprognosticbiomarkersuparintheemergencydepartmentimprovesriskstratificationbuthasnoeffectonmortalityaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrialtriageiii AT stefanssonjakobs useoftheprognosticbiomarkersuparintheemergencydepartmentimprovesriskstratificationbuthasnoeffectonmortalityaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrialtriageiii AT falkentoftalexanderc useoftheprognosticbiomarkersuparintheemergencydepartmentimprovesriskstratificationbuthasnoeffectonmortalityaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrialtriageiii AT alstrupmorten useoftheprognosticbiomarkersuparintheemergencydepartmentimprovesriskstratificationbuthasnoeffectonmortalityaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrialtriageiii AT sandøandreas useoftheprognosticbiomarkersuparintheemergencydepartmentimprovesriskstratificationbuthasnoeffectonmortalityaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrialtriageiii AT hollesarahlk useoftheprognosticbiomarkersuparintheemergencydepartmentimprovesriskstratificationbuthasnoeffectonmortalityaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrialtriageiii AT meyerjeppe useoftheprognosticbiomarkersuparintheemergencydepartmentimprovesriskstratificationbuthasnoeffectonmortalityaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrialtriageiii AT tornkvistpeterbs useoftheprognosticbiomarkersuparintheemergencydepartmentimprovesriskstratificationbuthasnoeffectonmortalityaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrialtriageiii AT høihansenthomas useoftheprognosticbiomarkersuparintheemergencydepartmentimprovesriskstratificationbuthasnoeffectonmortalityaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrialtriageiii AT kjøllererik useoftheprognosticbiomarkersuparintheemergencydepartmentimprovesriskstratificationbuthasnoeffectonmortalityaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrialtriageiii AT jensenbirgittenybo useoftheprognosticbiomarkersuparintheemergencydepartmentimprovesriskstratificationbuthasnoeffectonmortalityaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrialtriageiii AT lindmorten useoftheprognosticbiomarkersuparintheemergencydepartmentimprovesriskstratificationbuthasnoeffectonmortalityaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrialtriageiii AT ravnlisbet useoftheprognosticbiomarkersuparintheemergencydepartmentimprovesriskstratificationbuthasnoeffectonmortalityaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrialtriageiii AT kallemosethomas useoftheprognosticbiomarkersuparintheemergencydepartmentimprovesriskstratificationbuthasnoeffectonmortalityaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrialtriageiii AT langetheis useoftheprognosticbiomarkersuparintheemergencydepartmentimprovesriskstratificationbuthasnoeffectonmortalityaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrialtriageiii AT køberlars useoftheprognosticbiomarkersuparintheemergencydepartmentimprovesriskstratificationbuthasnoeffectonmortalityaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrialtriageiii AT rasmussenlarssimon useoftheprognosticbiomarkersuparintheemergencydepartmentimprovesriskstratificationbuthasnoeffectonmortalityaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrialtriageiii AT eugenolsenjesper useoftheprognosticbiomarkersuparintheemergencydepartmentimprovesriskstratificationbuthasnoeffectonmortalityaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrialtriageiii AT iversenkasperkarmark useoftheprognosticbiomarkersuparintheemergencydepartmentimprovesriskstratificationbuthasnoeffectonmortalityaclusterrandomizedclinicaltrialtriageiii |