Cargando…

Phytolith analysis for differentiating between broomcorn millet (Panicum miliaceum) and its weed/feral type (Panicum ruderale)

Domestication of broomcorn millet (Panicum miliaceum) is one of the most significant events in prehistoric East Asia, providing sufficient food supply for the explosive growth of Neolithic populations and the transition into complex societies. However, to date, the process of broomcorn millet domest...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Jianping, Lu, Houyuan, Liu, Minxuan, Diao, Xianmin, Shao, Konglan, Wu, Naiqin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6115419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30158541
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31467-6
_version_ 1783351379675316224
author Zhang, Jianping
Lu, Houyuan
Liu, Minxuan
Diao, Xianmin
Shao, Konglan
Wu, Naiqin
author_facet Zhang, Jianping
Lu, Houyuan
Liu, Minxuan
Diao, Xianmin
Shao, Konglan
Wu, Naiqin
author_sort Zhang, Jianping
collection PubMed
description Domestication of broomcorn millet (Panicum miliaceum) is one of the most significant events in prehistoric East Asia, providing sufficient food supply for the explosive growth of Neolithic populations and the transition into complex societies. However, to date, the process of broomcorn millet domestication is still largely unknown, partly due to the lack of clear diagnostic tools for distinguishing between millet and its related wild grasses in archaeological samples. Here, we examined the percentage of silicified epidermal long-cell undulated patterns in the glume and palea from inflorescence bracts in 21 modern varieties of broomcorn millet and 12 weed/feral-type Panicum ruderale collected across northern China. Our results show that the percentage of ηIII patterns in domesticated broomcorn millet (23.0% ± 5.9%; n = 63) is about 10% higher than in P. ruderale (10.8% ± 5.8%; n = 36), with quartiles of 17.2–28.3% and 5.1–15.5%, respectively. Owing to the increase in ηIII pattern percentage correlates significantly with a decrease in the grain length/width ratio, in the absence of exact wild ancestors of broomcorn millet, the characterization of phytolith differences between P. ruderale and P. miliaceum thus becomes an alternative approach to provide insight into origin of broomcorn millet.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6115419
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61154192018-09-04 Phytolith analysis for differentiating between broomcorn millet (Panicum miliaceum) and its weed/feral type (Panicum ruderale) Zhang, Jianping Lu, Houyuan Liu, Minxuan Diao, Xianmin Shao, Konglan Wu, Naiqin Sci Rep Article Domestication of broomcorn millet (Panicum miliaceum) is one of the most significant events in prehistoric East Asia, providing sufficient food supply for the explosive growth of Neolithic populations and the transition into complex societies. However, to date, the process of broomcorn millet domestication is still largely unknown, partly due to the lack of clear diagnostic tools for distinguishing between millet and its related wild grasses in archaeological samples. Here, we examined the percentage of silicified epidermal long-cell undulated patterns in the glume and palea from inflorescence bracts in 21 modern varieties of broomcorn millet and 12 weed/feral-type Panicum ruderale collected across northern China. Our results show that the percentage of ηIII patterns in domesticated broomcorn millet (23.0% ± 5.9%; n = 63) is about 10% higher than in P. ruderale (10.8% ± 5.8%; n = 36), with quartiles of 17.2–28.3% and 5.1–15.5%, respectively. Owing to the increase in ηIII pattern percentage correlates significantly with a decrease in the grain length/width ratio, in the absence of exact wild ancestors of broomcorn millet, the characterization of phytolith differences between P. ruderale and P. miliaceum thus becomes an alternative approach to provide insight into origin of broomcorn millet. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6115419/ /pubmed/30158541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31467-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Zhang, Jianping
Lu, Houyuan
Liu, Minxuan
Diao, Xianmin
Shao, Konglan
Wu, Naiqin
Phytolith analysis for differentiating between broomcorn millet (Panicum miliaceum) and its weed/feral type (Panicum ruderale)
title Phytolith analysis for differentiating between broomcorn millet (Panicum miliaceum) and its weed/feral type (Panicum ruderale)
title_full Phytolith analysis for differentiating between broomcorn millet (Panicum miliaceum) and its weed/feral type (Panicum ruderale)
title_fullStr Phytolith analysis for differentiating between broomcorn millet (Panicum miliaceum) and its weed/feral type (Panicum ruderale)
title_full_unstemmed Phytolith analysis for differentiating between broomcorn millet (Panicum miliaceum) and its weed/feral type (Panicum ruderale)
title_short Phytolith analysis for differentiating between broomcorn millet (Panicum miliaceum) and its weed/feral type (Panicum ruderale)
title_sort phytolith analysis for differentiating between broomcorn millet (panicum miliaceum) and its weed/feral type (panicum ruderale)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6115419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30158541
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31467-6
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangjianping phytolithanalysisfordifferentiatingbetweenbroomcornmilletpanicummiliaceumanditsweedferaltypepanicumruderale
AT luhouyuan phytolithanalysisfordifferentiatingbetweenbroomcornmilletpanicummiliaceumanditsweedferaltypepanicumruderale
AT liuminxuan phytolithanalysisfordifferentiatingbetweenbroomcornmilletpanicummiliaceumanditsweedferaltypepanicumruderale
AT diaoxianmin phytolithanalysisfordifferentiatingbetweenbroomcornmilletpanicummiliaceumanditsweedferaltypepanicumruderale
AT shaokonglan phytolithanalysisfordifferentiatingbetweenbroomcornmilletpanicummiliaceumanditsweedferaltypepanicumruderale
AT wunaiqin phytolithanalysisfordifferentiatingbetweenbroomcornmilletpanicummiliaceumanditsweedferaltypepanicumruderale