Cargando…

3D cephalometric analysis using Magnetic Resonance Imaging: validation of accuracy and reproducibility

The aim of this study was to validate geometric accuracy and in vivo reproducibility of landmark-based cephalometric measurements using high-resolution 3D Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) at 3 Tesla. For accuracy validation, 96 angular and 96 linear measurements were taken on a phantom in 3 differen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Juerchott, Alexander, Saleem, Muhammad Abdullah, Hilgenfeld, Tim, Freudlsperger, Christian, Zingler, Sebastian, Lux, Christopher J., Bendszus, Martin, Heiland, Sabine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6115428/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30158656
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31384-8
_version_ 1783351381809168384
author Juerchott, Alexander
Saleem, Muhammad Abdullah
Hilgenfeld, Tim
Freudlsperger, Christian
Zingler, Sebastian
Lux, Christopher J.
Bendszus, Martin
Heiland, Sabine
author_facet Juerchott, Alexander
Saleem, Muhammad Abdullah
Hilgenfeld, Tim
Freudlsperger, Christian
Zingler, Sebastian
Lux, Christopher J.
Bendszus, Martin
Heiland, Sabine
author_sort Juerchott, Alexander
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to validate geometric accuracy and in vivo reproducibility of landmark-based cephalometric measurements using high-resolution 3D Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) at 3 Tesla. For accuracy validation, 96 angular and 96 linear measurements were taken on a phantom in 3 different positions. In vivo MRI scans were performed on 3 volunteers in five head positions. For each in vivo scan, 27 landmarks were determined from which 19 angles and 26 distances were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using Bland-Altman analysis, the two one-sided tests procedure and repeated measures one-way analysis of variance. In comparison to ground truth, all MRI-based phantom measurements showed statistical equivalence (p < 0.001) and an excellent agreement in Bland-Altman analysis (bias ranges: −0.090–0.044°, −0.220–0.241 mm). In vivo cephalometric analysis was highly reproducible among the five different head positions in all study participants, without statistical differences for all angles and distances (p > 0.05). Ranges between maximum and minimum in vivo values were consistently smaller than 2° and 2 mm, respectively (average ranges: 0.88°/0.87 mm). In conclusion, this study demonstrates that accurate and reproducible 3D cephalometric analysis can be performed without exposure to ionizing radiation using MRI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6115428
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61154282018-09-04 3D cephalometric analysis using Magnetic Resonance Imaging: validation of accuracy and reproducibility Juerchott, Alexander Saleem, Muhammad Abdullah Hilgenfeld, Tim Freudlsperger, Christian Zingler, Sebastian Lux, Christopher J. Bendszus, Martin Heiland, Sabine Sci Rep Article The aim of this study was to validate geometric accuracy and in vivo reproducibility of landmark-based cephalometric measurements using high-resolution 3D Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) at 3 Tesla. For accuracy validation, 96 angular and 96 linear measurements were taken on a phantom in 3 different positions. In vivo MRI scans were performed on 3 volunteers in five head positions. For each in vivo scan, 27 landmarks were determined from which 19 angles and 26 distances were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using Bland-Altman analysis, the two one-sided tests procedure and repeated measures one-way analysis of variance. In comparison to ground truth, all MRI-based phantom measurements showed statistical equivalence (p < 0.001) and an excellent agreement in Bland-Altman analysis (bias ranges: −0.090–0.044°, −0.220–0.241 mm). In vivo cephalometric analysis was highly reproducible among the five different head positions in all study participants, without statistical differences for all angles and distances (p > 0.05). Ranges between maximum and minimum in vivo values were consistently smaller than 2° and 2 mm, respectively (average ranges: 0.88°/0.87 mm). In conclusion, this study demonstrates that accurate and reproducible 3D cephalometric analysis can be performed without exposure to ionizing radiation using MRI. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6115428/ /pubmed/30158656 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31384-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Juerchott, Alexander
Saleem, Muhammad Abdullah
Hilgenfeld, Tim
Freudlsperger, Christian
Zingler, Sebastian
Lux, Christopher J.
Bendszus, Martin
Heiland, Sabine
3D cephalometric analysis using Magnetic Resonance Imaging: validation of accuracy and reproducibility
title 3D cephalometric analysis using Magnetic Resonance Imaging: validation of accuracy and reproducibility
title_full 3D cephalometric analysis using Magnetic Resonance Imaging: validation of accuracy and reproducibility
title_fullStr 3D cephalometric analysis using Magnetic Resonance Imaging: validation of accuracy and reproducibility
title_full_unstemmed 3D cephalometric analysis using Magnetic Resonance Imaging: validation of accuracy and reproducibility
title_short 3D cephalometric analysis using Magnetic Resonance Imaging: validation of accuracy and reproducibility
title_sort 3d cephalometric analysis using magnetic resonance imaging: validation of accuracy and reproducibility
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6115428/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30158656
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31384-8
work_keys_str_mv AT juerchottalexander 3dcephalometricanalysisusingmagneticresonanceimagingvalidationofaccuracyandreproducibility
AT saleemmuhammadabdullah 3dcephalometricanalysisusingmagneticresonanceimagingvalidationofaccuracyandreproducibility
AT hilgenfeldtim 3dcephalometricanalysisusingmagneticresonanceimagingvalidationofaccuracyandreproducibility
AT freudlspergerchristian 3dcephalometricanalysisusingmagneticresonanceimagingvalidationofaccuracyandreproducibility
AT zinglersebastian 3dcephalometricanalysisusingmagneticresonanceimagingvalidationofaccuracyandreproducibility
AT luxchristopherj 3dcephalometricanalysisusingmagneticresonanceimagingvalidationofaccuracyandreproducibility
AT bendszusmartin 3dcephalometricanalysisusingmagneticresonanceimagingvalidationofaccuracyandreproducibility
AT heilandsabine 3dcephalometricanalysisusingmagneticresonanceimagingvalidationofaccuracyandreproducibility