Cargando…
3D cephalometric analysis using Magnetic Resonance Imaging: validation of accuracy and reproducibility
The aim of this study was to validate geometric accuracy and in vivo reproducibility of landmark-based cephalometric measurements using high-resolution 3D Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) at 3 Tesla. For accuracy validation, 96 angular and 96 linear measurements were taken on a phantom in 3 differen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6115428/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30158656 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31384-8 |
_version_ | 1783351381809168384 |
---|---|
author | Juerchott, Alexander Saleem, Muhammad Abdullah Hilgenfeld, Tim Freudlsperger, Christian Zingler, Sebastian Lux, Christopher J. Bendszus, Martin Heiland, Sabine |
author_facet | Juerchott, Alexander Saleem, Muhammad Abdullah Hilgenfeld, Tim Freudlsperger, Christian Zingler, Sebastian Lux, Christopher J. Bendszus, Martin Heiland, Sabine |
author_sort | Juerchott, Alexander |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this study was to validate geometric accuracy and in vivo reproducibility of landmark-based cephalometric measurements using high-resolution 3D Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) at 3 Tesla. For accuracy validation, 96 angular and 96 linear measurements were taken on a phantom in 3 different positions. In vivo MRI scans were performed on 3 volunteers in five head positions. For each in vivo scan, 27 landmarks were determined from which 19 angles and 26 distances were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using Bland-Altman analysis, the two one-sided tests procedure and repeated measures one-way analysis of variance. In comparison to ground truth, all MRI-based phantom measurements showed statistical equivalence (p < 0.001) and an excellent agreement in Bland-Altman analysis (bias ranges: −0.090–0.044°, −0.220–0.241 mm). In vivo cephalometric analysis was highly reproducible among the five different head positions in all study participants, without statistical differences for all angles and distances (p > 0.05). Ranges between maximum and minimum in vivo values were consistently smaller than 2° and 2 mm, respectively (average ranges: 0.88°/0.87 mm). In conclusion, this study demonstrates that accurate and reproducible 3D cephalometric analysis can be performed without exposure to ionizing radiation using MRI. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6115428 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61154282018-09-04 3D cephalometric analysis using Magnetic Resonance Imaging: validation of accuracy and reproducibility Juerchott, Alexander Saleem, Muhammad Abdullah Hilgenfeld, Tim Freudlsperger, Christian Zingler, Sebastian Lux, Christopher J. Bendszus, Martin Heiland, Sabine Sci Rep Article The aim of this study was to validate geometric accuracy and in vivo reproducibility of landmark-based cephalometric measurements using high-resolution 3D Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) at 3 Tesla. For accuracy validation, 96 angular and 96 linear measurements were taken on a phantom in 3 different positions. In vivo MRI scans were performed on 3 volunteers in five head positions. For each in vivo scan, 27 landmarks were determined from which 19 angles and 26 distances were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using Bland-Altman analysis, the two one-sided tests procedure and repeated measures one-way analysis of variance. In comparison to ground truth, all MRI-based phantom measurements showed statistical equivalence (p < 0.001) and an excellent agreement in Bland-Altman analysis (bias ranges: −0.090–0.044°, −0.220–0.241 mm). In vivo cephalometric analysis was highly reproducible among the five different head positions in all study participants, without statistical differences for all angles and distances (p > 0.05). Ranges between maximum and minimum in vivo values were consistently smaller than 2° and 2 mm, respectively (average ranges: 0.88°/0.87 mm). In conclusion, this study demonstrates that accurate and reproducible 3D cephalometric analysis can be performed without exposure to ionizing radiation using MRI. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6115428/ /pubmed/30158656 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31384-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Juerchott, Alexander Saleem, Muhammad Abdullah Hilgenfeld, Tim Freudlsperger, Christian Zingler, Sebastian Lux, Christopher J. Bendszus, Martin Heiland, Sabine 3D cephalometric analysis using Magnetic Resonance Imaging: validation of accuracy and reproducibility |
title | 3D cephalometric analysis using Magnetic Resonance Imaging: validation of accuracy and reproducibility |
title_full | 3D cephalometric analysis using Magnetic Resonance Imaging: validation of accuracy and reproducibility |
title_fullStr | 3D cephalometric analysis using Magnetic Resonance Imaging: validation of accuracy and reproducibility |
title_full_unstemmed | 3D cephalometric analysis using Magnetic Resonance Imaging: validation of accuracy and reproducibility |
title_short | 3D cephalometric analysis using Magnetic Resonance Imaging: validation of accuracy and reproducibility |
title_sort | 3d cephalometric analysis using magnetic resonance imaging: validation of accuracy and reproducibility |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6115428/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30158656 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31384-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT juerchottalexander 3dcephalometricanalysisusingmagneticresonanceimagingvalidationofaccuracyandreproducibility AT saleemmuhammadabdullah 3dcephalometricanalysisusingmagneticresonanceimagingvalidationofaccuracyandreproducibility AT hilgenfeldtim 3dcephalometricanalysisusingmagneticresonanceimagingvalidationofaccuracyandreproducibility AT freudlspergerchristian 3dcephalometricanalysisusingmagneticresonanceimagingvalidationofaccuracyandreproducibility AT zinglersebastian 3dcephalometricanalysisusingmagneticresonanceimagingvalidationofaccuracyandreproducibility AT luxchristopherj 3dcephalometricanalysisusingmagneticresonanceimagingvalidationofaccuracyandreproducibility AT bendszusmartin 3dcephalometricanalysisusingmagneticresonanceimagingvalidationofaccuracyandreproducibility AT heilandsabine 3dcephalometricanalysisusingmagneticresonanceimagingvalidationofaccuracyandreproducibility |