Cargando…

Domestic horses (Equus caballus) discriminate between negative and positive human nonverbal vocalisations

The ability to discriminate between emotion in vocal signals is highly adaptive in social species. It may also be adaptive for domestic species to distinguish such signals in humans. Here we present a playback study investigating whether horses spontaneously respond in a functionally relevant way to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, Amy Victoria, Proops, Leanne, Grounds, Kate, Wathan, Jennifer, Scott, Sophie K, McComb, Karen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6115467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30158532
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-30777-z
_version_ 1783351390861524992
author Smith, Amy Victoria
Proops, Leanne
Grounds, Kate
Wathan, Jennifer
Scott, Sophie K
McComb, Karen
author_facet Smith, Amy Victoria
Proops, Leanne
Grounds, Kate
Wathan, Jennifer
Scott, Sophie K
McComb, Karen
author_sort Smith, Amy Victoria
collection PubMed
description The ability to discriminate between emotion in vocal signals is highly adaptive in social species. It may also be adaptive for domestic species to distinguish such signals in humans. Here we present a playback study investigating whether horses spontaneously respond in a functionally relevant way towards positive and negative emotion in human nonverbal vocalisations. We presented horses with positively- and negatively-valenced human vocalisations (laughter and growling, respectively) in the absence of all other emotional cues. Horses were found to adopt a freeze posture for significantly longer immediately after hearing negative versus positive human vocalisations, suggesting that negative voices promote vigilance behaviours and may therefore be perceived as more threatening. In support of this interpretation, horses held their ears forwards for longer and performed fewer ear movements in response to negative voices, which further suggest increased vigilance. In addition, horses showed a right-ear/left-hemisphere bias when attending to positive compared with negative voices, suggesting that horses perceive laughter as more positive than growling. These findings raise interesting questions about the potential for universal discrimination of vocal affect and the role of lifetime learning versus other factors in interspecific communication.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6115467
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61154672018-09-05 Domestic horses (Equus caballus) discriminate between negative and positive human nonverbal vocalisations Smith, Amy Victoria Proops, Leanne Grounds, Kate Wathan, Jennifer Scott, Sophie K McComb, Karen Sci Rep Article The ability to discriminate between emotion in vocal signals is highly adaptive in social species. It may also be adaptive for domestic species to distinguish such signals in humans. Here we present a playback study investigating whether horses spontaneously respond in a functionally relevant way towards positive and negative emotion in human nonverbal vocalisations. We presented horses with positively- and negatively-valenced human vocalisations (laughter and growling, respectively) in the absence of all other emotional cues. Horses were found to adopt a freeze posture for significantly longer immediately after hearing negative versus positive human vocalisations, suggesting that negative voices promote vigilance behaviours and may therefore be perceived as more threatening. In support of this interpretation, horses held their ears forwards for longer and performed fewer ear movements in response to negative voices, which further suggest increased vigilance. In addition, horses showed a right-ear/left-hemisphere bias when attending to positive compared with negative voices, suggesting that horses perceive laughter as more positive than growling. These findings raise interesting questions about the potential for universal discrimination of vocal affect and the role of lifetime learning versus other factors in interspecific communication. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6115467/ /pubmed/30158532 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-30777-z Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Smith, Amy Victoria
Proops, Leanne
Grounds, Kate
Wathan, Jennifer
Scott, Sophie K
McComb, Karen
Domestic horses (Equus caballus) discriminate between negative and positive human nonverbal vocalisations
title Domestic horses (Equus caballus) discriminate between negative and positive human nonverbal vocalisations
title_full Domestic horses (Equus caballus) discriminate between negative and positive human nonverbal vocalisations
title_fullStr Domestic horses (Equus caballus) discriminate between negative and positive human nonverbal vocalisations
title_full_unstemmed Domestic horses (Equus caballus) discriminate between negative and positive human nonverbal vocalisations
title_short Domestic horses (Equus caballus) discriminate between negative and positive human nonverbal vocalisations
title_sort domestic horses (equus caballus) discriminate between negative and positive human nonverbal vocalisations
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6115467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30158532
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-30777-z
work_keys_str_mv AT smithamyvictoria domestichorsesequuscaballusdiscriminatebetweennegativeandpositivehumannonverbalvocalisations
AT proopsleanne domestichorsesequuscaballusdiscriminatebetweennegativeandpositivehumannonverbalvocalisations
AT groundskate domestichorsesequuscaballusdiscriminatebetweennegativeandpositivehumannonverbalvocalisations
AT wathanjennifer domestichorsesequuscaballusdiscriminatebetweennegativeandpositivehumannonverbalvocalisations
AT scottsophiek domestichorsesequuscaballusdiscriminatebetweennegativeandpositivehumannonverbalvocalisations
AT mccombkaren domestichorsesequuscaballusdiscriminatebetweennegativeandpositivehumannonverbalvocalisations