Cargando…

Design Features of Randomized Clinical Trials of Vitamin D and Falls: A Systematic Review

Recent guidelines have advocated against the use of vitamin D supplementation as a means to prevent falls in older adults. However, meta-analyses of the available trials have reached divergent conclusions, and the key design features of these trials have not been well characterized. We conducted a s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tang, Olive, Juraschek, Stephen P., Appel, Lawrence J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6115709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30049963
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu10080964
_version_ 1783351443395182592
author Tang, Olive
Juraschek, Stephen P.
Appel, Lawrence J.
author_facet Tang, Olive
Juraschek, Stephen P.
Appel, Lawrence J.
author_sort Tang, Olive
collection PubMed
description Recent guidelines have advocated against the use of vitamin D supplementation as a means to prevent falls in older adults. However, meta-analyses of the available trials have reached divergent conclusions, and the key design features of these trials have not been well characterized. We conducted a systematic review of 30 randomized trials that reported the effects of vitamin D supplements on falls. Trials were identified by reviewing references of published meta-analyses and updated with a systematic PubMed search. We assessed three key design features: (1) recruitment of participants with vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency; (2) provision of daily oral vitamin D supplementation; and (3) utilization of highly sensitive at-event falls ascertainment. The trials enrolled a median of 337 (IQR: 170-1864) participants. Four (13.3%) trials restricted enrollment to those who were at least vitamin D insufficient, 18 (60.0%) included at least one arm providing daily supplementation, and 16 (53.3%) used at-event reporting. There was substantial heterogeneity between trials, and no single trial incorporated all three key design features. Rather than concluding that vitamin D is ineffective as a means to prevent falls, these findings suggest that existing trial evidence is insufficient to guide recommendations on the use of vitamin D supplements to prevent falls.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6115709
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61157092018-09-04 Design Features of Randomized Clinical Trials of Vitamin D and Falls: A Systematic Review Tang, Olive Juraschek, Stephen P. Appel, Lawrence J. Nutrients Review Recent guidelines have advocated against the use of vitamin D supplementation as a means to prevent falls in older adults. However, meta-analyses of the available trials have reached divergent conclusions, and the key design features of these trials have not been well characterized. We conducted a systematic review of 30 randomized trials that reported the effects of vitamin D supplements on falls. Trials were identified by reviewing references of published meta-analyses and updated with a systematic PubMed search. We assessed three key design features: (1) recruitment of participants with vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency; (2) provision of daily oral vitamin D supplementation; and (3) utilization of highly sensitive at-event falls ascertainment. The trials enrolled a median of 337 (IQR: 170-1864) participants. Four (13.3%) trials restricted enrollment to those who were at least vitamin D insufficient, 18 (60.0%) included at least one arm providing daily supplementation, and 16 (53.3%) used at-event reporting. There was substantial heterogeneity between trials, and no single trial incorporated all three key design features. Rather than concluding that vitamin D is ineffective as a means to prevent falls, these findings suggest that existing trial evidence is insufficient to guide recommendations on the use of vitamin D supplements to prevent falls. MDPI 2018-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6115709/ /pubmed/30049963 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu10080964 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Tang, Olive
Juraschek, Stephen P.
Appel, Lawrence J.
Design Features of Randomized Clinical Trials of Vitamin D and Falls: A Systematic Review
title Design Features of Randomized Clinical Trials of Vitamin D and Falls: A Systematic Review
title_full Design Features of Randomized Clinical Trials of Vitamin D and Falls: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Design Features of Randomized Clinical Trials of Vitamin D and Falls: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Design Features of Randomized Clinical Trials of Vitamin D and Falls: A Systematic Review
title_short Design Features of Randomized Clinical Trials of Vitamin D and Falls: A Systematic Review
title_sort design features of randomized clinical trials of vitamin d and falls: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6115709/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30049963
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu10080964
work_keys_str_mv AT tangolive designfeaturesofrandomizedclinicaltrialsofvitamindandfallsasystematicreview
AT juraschekstephenp designfeaturesofrandomizedclinicaltrialsofvitamindandfallsasystematicreview
AT appellawrencej designfeaturesofrandomizedclinicaltrialsofvitamindandfallsasystematicreview