Cargando…

Seasonal and Sexual Differences in the Microbiota of the Hoopoe Uropygial Secretion

The uropygial gland of hoopoe nestlings and nesting females hosts bacterial symbionts that cause changes in the characteristics of its secretion, including an increase of its antimicrobial activity. These changes occur only in nesting individuals during the breeding season, possibly associated with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rodríguez-Ruano, Sonia M., Martín-Vivaldi, Manuel, Peralta-Sánchez, Juan M., García-Martín, Ana B., Martínez-García, Ángela, Soler, Juan J., Valdivia, Eva, Martínez-Bueno, Manuel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6115775/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30103505
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes9080407
_version_ 1783351458747383808
author Rodríguez-Ruano, Sonia M.
Martín-Vivaldi, Manuel
Peralta-Sánchez, Juan M.
García-Martín, Ana B.
Martínez-García, Ángela
Soler, Juan J.
Valdivia, Eva
Martínez-Bueno, Manuel
author_facet Rodríguez-Ruano, Sonia M.
Martín-Vivaldi, Manuel
Peralta-Sánchez, Juan M.
García-Martín, Ana B.
Martínez-García, Ángela
Soler, Juan J.
Valdivia, Eva
Martínez-Bueno, Manuel
author_sort Rodríguez-Ruano, Sonia M.
collection PubMed
description The uropygial gland of hoopoe nestlings and nesting females hosts bacterial symbionts that cause changes in the characteristics of its secretion, including an increase of its antimicrobial activity. These changes occur only in nesting individuals during the breeding season, possibly associated with the high infection risk experienced during the stay in the hole-nests. However, the knowledge on hoopoes uropygial gland microbial community dynamics is quite limited and based so far on culture-dependent and molecular fingerprinting studies. In this work, we sampled wild and captive hoopoes of different sex, age, and reproductive status, and studied their microbiota using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and pyrosequencing. Surprisingly, we found a complex bacterial community in all individuals (including non-nesting ones) during the breeding season. Nevertheless, dark secretions from nesting hoopoes harbored significantly higher bacterial density than white secretions from breeding males and both sexes in winter. We hypothesize that bacterial proliferation may be host-regulated in phases of high infection risk (i.e., nesting). We also highlight the importance of specific antimicrobial-producing bacteria present only in dark secretions that may be key in this defensive symbiosis. Finally, we discuss the possible role of environmental conditions in shaping the uropygial microbiota, based on differences found between wild and captive hoopoes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6115775
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61157752018-08-31 Seasonal and Sexual Differences in the Microbiota of the Hoopoe Uropygial Secretion Rodríguez-Ruano, Sonia M. Martín-Vivaldi, Manuel Peralta-Sánchez, Juan M. García-Martín, Ana B. Martínez-García, Ángela Soler, Juan J. Valdivia, Eva Martínez-Bueno, Manuel Genes (Basel) Article The uropygial gland of hoopoe nestlings and nesting females hosts bacterial symbionts that cause changes in the characteristics of its secretion, including an increase of its antimicrobial activity. These changes occur only in nesting individuals during the breeding season, possibly associated with the high infection risk experienced during the stay in the hole-nests. However, the knowledge on hoopoes uropygial gland microbial community dynamics is quite limited and based so far on culture-dependent and molecular fingerprinting studies. In this work, we sampled wild and captive hoopoes of different sex, age, and reproductive status, and studied their microbiota using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and pyrosequencing. Surprisingly, we found a complex bacterial community in all individuals (including non-nesting ones) during the breeding season. Nevertheless, dark secretions from nesting hoopoes harbored significantly higher bacterial density than white secretions from breeding males and both sexes in winter. We hypothesize that bacterial proliferation may be host-regulated in phases of high infection risk (i.e., nesting). We also highlight the importance of specific antimicrobial-producing bacteria present only in dark secretions that may be key in this defensive symbiosis. Finally, we discuss the possible role of environmental conditions in shaping the uropygial microbiota, based on differences found between wild and captive hoopoes. MDPI 2018-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6115775/ /pubmed/30103505 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes9080407 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Rodríguez-Ruano, Sonia M.
Martín-Vivaldi, Manuel
Peralta-Sánchez, Juan M.
García-Martín, Ana B.
Martínez-García, Ángela
Soler, Juan J.
Valdivia, Eva
Martínez-Bueno, Manuel
Seasonal and Sexual Differences in the Microbiota of the Hoopoe Uropygial Secretion
title Seasonal and Sexual Differences in the Microbiota of the Hoopoe Uropygial Secretion
title_full Seasonal and Sexual Differences in the Microbiota of the Hoopoe Uropygial Secretion
title_fullStr Seasonal and Sexual Differences in the Microbiota of the Hoopoe Uropygial Secretion
title_full_unstemmed Seasonal and Sexual Differences in the Microbiota of the Hoopoe Uropygial Secretion
title_short Seasonal and Sexual Differences in the Microbiota of the Hoopoe Uropygial Secretion
title_sort seasonal and sexual differences in the microbiota of the hoopoe uropygial secretion
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6115775/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30103505
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes9080407
work_keys_str_mv AT rodriguezruanosoniam seasonalandsexualdifferencesinthemicrobiotaofthehoopoeuropygialsecretion
AT martinvivaldimanuel seasonalandsexualdifferencesinthemicrobiotaofthehoopoeuropygialsecretion
AT peraltasanchezjuanm seasonalandsexualdifferencesinthemicrobiotaofthehoopoeuropygialsecretion
AT garciamartinanab seasonalandsexualdifferencesinthemicrobiotaofthehoopoeuropygialsecretion
AT martinezgarciaangela seasonalandsexualdifferencesinthemicrobiotaofthehoopoeuropygialsecretion
AT solerjuanj seasonalandsexualdifferencesinthemicrobiotaofthehoopoeuropygialsecretion
AT valdiviaeva seasonalandsexualdifferencesinthemicrobiotaofthehoopoeuropygialsecretion
AT martinezbuenomanuel seasonalandsexualdifferencesinthemicrobiotaofthehoopoeuropygialsecretion