Cargando…

Botulinum Neurotoxin Diversity from a Gene-Centered View

Botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) rank amongst the most potent toxins known. The factors responsible for the emergence of the many known and yet unknown BoNT variants remain elusive. It also remains unclear why anaerobic bacteria that are widely distributed in our environment and normally do not pose a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Benoit, Roger M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6115791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30071587
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins10080310
_version_ 1783351462458294272
author Benoit, Roger M.
author_facet Benoit, Roger M.
author_sort Benoit, Roger M.
collection PubMed
description Botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) rank amongst the most potent toxins known. The factors responsible for the emergence of the many known and yet unknown BoNT variants remain elusive. It also remains unclear why anaerobic bacteria that are widely distributed in our environment and normally do not pose a threat to humans, produce such deadly toxins. Even the possibility of accidental toxicity to humans has not been excluded. Here, I review the notion that BoNTs may have specifically evolved to target vertebrates. Considering the extremely complex molecular architecture of the toxins, which enables them to reach the bloodstream, to recognize and enter neurons, and to block neurotransmitter release, it seems highly unlikely that BoNT toxicity to vertebrates is a coincidence. The carcass–maggot cycle provides a plausible explanation for a natural role of the toxins: to enable mass reproduction of bacteria, spores, and toxins, using toxin-unaffected invertebrates, such as fly maggots, as the vectors. There is no clear correlation between toxigenicity and a selective advantage of clostridia in their natural habitat. Possibly, non-toxigenic strains profit from carcasses resulting from the action of toxigenic strains. Alternatively, a gene-centered view of toxin evolution would also explain this observation. Toxin-coding mobile genetic elements may have evolved as selfish genes, promoting their own propagation, similar to commensal viruses, using clostridia and other bacteria as the host. Research addressing the role of BoNTs in nature and the origin of toxin variability goes hand in hand with the identification of new toxin variants and the design of improved toxin variants for medical applications. These research directions may also reveal yet unknown natural antidotes against these extremely potent neurotoxins.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6115791
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61157912018-08-31 Botulinum Neurotoxin Diversity from a Gene-Centered View Benoit, Roger M. Toxins (Basel) Opinion Botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) rank amongst the most potent toxins known. The factors responsible for the emergence of the many known and yet unknown BoNT variants remain elusive. It also remains unclear why anaerobic bacteria that are widely distributed in our environment and normally do not pose a threat to humans, produce such deadly toxins. Even the possibility of accidental toxicity to humans has not been excluded. Here, I review the notion that BoNTs may have specifically evolved to target vertebrates. Considering the extremely complex molecular architecture of the toxins, which enables them to reach the bloodstream, to recognize and enter neurons, and to block neurotransmitter release, it seems highly unlikely that BoNT toxicity to vertebrates is a coincidence. The carcass–maggot cycle provides a plausible explanation for a natural role of the toxins: to enable mass reproduction of bacteria, spores, and toxins, using toxin-unaffected invertebrates, such as fly maggots, as the vectors. There is no clear correlation between toxigenicity and a selective advantage of clostridia in their natural habitat. Possibly, non-toxigenic strains profit from carcasses resulting from the action of toxigenic strains. Alternatively, a gene-centered view of toxin evolution would also explain this observation. Toxin-coding mobile genetic elements may have evolved as selfish genes, promoting their own propagation, similar to commensal viruses, using clostridia and other bacteria as the host. Research addressing the role of BoNTs in nature and the origin of toxin variability goes hand in hand with the identification of new toxin variants and the design of improved toxin variants for medical applications. These research directions may also reveal yet unknown natural antidotes against these extremely potent neurotoxins. MDPI 2018-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6115791/ /pubmed/30071587 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins10080310 Text en © 2018 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Opinion
Benoit, Roger M.
Botulinum Neurotoxin Diversity from a Gene-Centered View
title Botulinum Neurotoxin Diversity from a Gene-Centered View
title_full Botulinum Neurotoxin Diversity from a Gene-Centered View
title_fullStr Botulinum Neurotoxin Diversity from a Gene-Centered View
title_full_unstemmed Botulinum Neurotoxin Diversity from a Gene-Centered View
title_short Botulinum Neurotoxin Diversity from a Gene-Centered View
title_sort botulinum neurotoxin diversity from a gene-centered view
topic Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6115791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30071587
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins10080310
work_keys_str_mv AT benoitrogerm botulinumneurotoxindiversityfromagenecenteredview