Cargando…
An Evaluation of Two Different Broiler Catching Methods
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Catching is the process that transfers birds from the poultry house to the transport modules. The catching process and its associated handling may lead to stress, injuries, mortality and reduced welfare for the animals. The aim of this pilot study was to investigate the effect of two...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6115793/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30111730 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani8080141 |
_version_ | 1783351462927007744 |
---|---|
author | Kittelsen, Käthe Elise Granquist, Erik Georg Aunsmo, Agnete Lien Moe, Randi Oppermann Tolo, Elisiv |
author_facet | Kittelsen, Käthe Elise Granquist, Erik Georg Aunsmo, Agnete Lien Moe, Randi Oppermann Tolo, Elisiv |
author_sort | Kittelsen, Käthe Elise |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: Catching is the process that transfers birds from the poultry house to the transport modules. The catching process and its associated handling may lead to stress, injuries, mortality and reduced welfare for the animals. The aim of this pilot study was to investigate the effect of two manual broiler catching methods. Broilers were either caught by both legs and carried inverted to the drawers or caught under the abdomen and carried in an upright position. Effects of catching method on crating time, number of animals in the drawers, wing and leg fractures, animals on their back in the drawers and broilers dead-on-arrival were investigated. The results showed that the abdominal and upright method was faster and gave a lower and more consistent number of birds per drawer. In addition, this method tended towards fewer wing fractures. No broken legs, birds on their back in the drawers or broilers dead-on-arrival were observed in the study. Catching is a critical phase in the pre-slaughter chain, and this study shows that the catching and carrying method affects broiler welfare. ABSTRACT: Catching is the first step in the pre-slaughter chain for broiler chickens. The process may be detrimental for animal welfare due to the associated handling. The aim of this pilot study was to compare two different methods to manually catch broilers: Catching the broilers by two legs and carrying them inverted (LEGS) or catching the broilers under the abdomen and carrying them in an upright position (UPRIGHT). Wing and leg fractures upon arrival at the abattoir, animal density in the drawers, birds on their back, broilers dead-on-arrival and time to fill the transport modules were investigated. The results showed that mean crating time was shorter in the UPRIGHT method (p = 0.007). There was a tendency for more wing fractures in broilers caught by the LEGS (p = 0.06). The animal density in the drawers was lower and with a smaller range in the UPRIGHT method (p = 0.022). The results indicate that catching the broilers under the abdomen in an upright position may improve broiler welfare in terms of fewer wing fractures, more consistent stocking density in drawers and potentially reduced loading time. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6115793 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61157932018-08-31 An Evaluation of Two Different Broiler Catching Methods Kittelsen, Käthe Elise Granquist, Erik Georg Aunsmo, Agnete Lien Moe, Randi Oppermann Tolo, Elisiv Animals (Basel) Communication SIMPLE SUMMARY: Catching is the process that transfers birds from the poultry house to the transport modules. The catching process and its associated handling may lead to stress, injuries, mortality and reduced welfare for the animals. The aim of this pilot study was to investigate the effect of two manual broiler catching methods. Broilers were either caught by both legs and carried inverted to the drawers or caught under the abdomen and carried in an upright position. Effects of catching method on crating time, number of animals in the drawers, wing and leg fractures, animals on their back in the drawers and broilers dead-on-arrival were investigated. The results showed that the abdominal and upright method was faster and gave a lower and more consistent number of birds per drawer. In addition, this method tended towards fewer wing fractures. No broken legs, birds on their back in the drawers or broilers dead-on-arrival were observed in the study. Catching is a critical phase in the pre-slaughter chain, and this study shows that the catching and carrying method affects broiler welfare. ABSTRACT: Catching is the first step in the pre-slaughter chain for broiler chickens. The process may be detrimental for animal welfare due to the associated handling. The aim of this pilot study was to compare two different methods to manually catch broilers: Catching the broilers by two legs and carrying them inverted (LEGS) or catching the broilers under the abdomen and carrying them in an upright position (UPRIGHT). Wing and leg fractures upon arrival at the abattoir, animal density in the drawers, birds on their back, broilers dead-on-arrival and time to fill the transport modules were investigated. The results showed that mean crating time was shorter in the UPRIGHT method (p = 0.007). There was a tendency for more wing fractures in broilers caught by the LEGS (p = 0.06). The animal density in the drawers was lower and with a smaller range in the UPRIGHT method (p = 0.022). The results indicate that catching the broilers under the abdomen in an upright position may improve broiler welfare in terms of fewer wing fractures, more consistent stocking density in drawers and potentially reduced loading time. MDPI 2018-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6115793/ /pubmed/30111730 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani8080141 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Communication Kittelsen, Käthe Elise Granquist, Erik Georg Aunsmo, Agnete Lien Moe, Randi Oppermann Tolo, Elisiv An Evaluation of Two Different Broiler Catching Methods |
title | An Evaluation of Two Different Broiler Catching Methods |
title_full | An Evaluation of Two Different Broiler Catching Methods |
title_fullStr | An Evaluation of Two Different Broiler Catching Methods |
title_full_unstemmed | An Evaluation of Two Different Broiler Catching Methods |
title_short | An Evaluation of Two Different Broiler Catching Methods |
title_sort | evaluation of two different broiler catching methods |
topic | Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6115793/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30111730 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani8080141 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kittelsenkatheelise anevaluationoftwodifferentbroilercatchingmethods AT granquisterikgeorg anevaluationoftwodifferentbroilercatchingmethods AT aunsmoagnetelien anevaluationoftwodifferentbroilercatchingmethods AT moerandioppermann anevaluationoftwodifferentbroilercatchingmethods AT toloelisiv anevaluationoftwodifferentbroilercatchingmethods AT kittelsenkatheelise evaluationoftwodifferentbroilercatchingmethods AT granquisterikgeorg evaluationoftwodifferentbroilercatchingmethods AT aunsmoagnetelien evaluationoftwodifferentbroilercatchingmethods AT moerandioppermann evaluationoftwodifferentbroilercatchingmethods AT toloelisiv evaluationoftwodifferentbroilercatchingmethods |