Cargando…

An Evaluation of Two Different Broiler Catching Methods

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Catching is the process that transfers birds from the poultry house to the transport modules. The catching process and its associated handling may lead to stress, injuries, mortality and reduced welfare for the animals. The aim of this pilot study was to investigate the effect of two...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kittelsen, Käthe Elise, Granquist, Erik Georg, Aunsmo, Agnete Lien, Moe, Randi Oppermann, Tolo, Elisiv
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6115793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30111730
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani8080141
_version_ 1783351462927007744
author Kittelsen, Käthe Elise
Granquist, Erik Georg
Aunsmo, Agnete Lien
Moe, Randi Oppermann
Tolo, Elisiv
author_facet Kittelsen, Käthe Elise
Granquist, Erik Georg
Aunsmo, Agnete Lien
Moe, Randi Oppermann
Tolo, Elisiv
author_sort Kittelsen, Käthe Elise
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Catching is the process that transfers birds from the poultry house to the transport modules. The catching process and its associated handling may lead to stress, injuries, mortality and reduced welfare for the animals. The aim of this pilot study was to investigate the effect of two manual broiler catching methods. Broilers were either caught by both legs and carried inverted to the drawers or caught under the abdomen and carried in an upright position. Effects of catching method on crating time, number of animals in the drawers, wing and leg fractures, animals on their back in the drawers and broilers dead-on-arrival were investigated. The results showed that the abdominal and upright method was faster and gave a lower and more consistent number of birds per drawer. In addition, this method tended towards fewer wing fractures. No broken legs, birds on their back in the drawers or broilers dead-on-arrival were observed in the study. Catching is a critical phase in the pre-slaughter chain, and this study shows that the catching and carrying method affects broiler welfare. ABSTRACT: Catching is the first step in the pre-slaughter chain for broiler chickens. The process may be detrimental for animal welfare due to the associated handling. The aim of this pilot study was to compare two different methods to manually catch broilers: Catching the broilers by two legs and carrying them inverted (LEGS) or catching the broilers under the abdomen and carrying them in an upright position (UPRIGHT). Wing and leg fractures upon arrival at the abattoir, animal density in the drawers, birds on their back, broilers dead-on-arrival and time to fill the transport modules were investigated. The results showed that mean crating time was shorter in the UPRIGHT method (p = 0.007). There was a tendency for more wing fractures in broilers caught by the LEGS (p = 0.06). The animal density in the drawers was lower and with a smaller range in the UPRIGHT method (p = 0.022). The results indicate that catching the broilers under the abdomen in an upright position may improve broiler welfare in terms of fewer wing fractures, more consistent stocking density in drawers and potentially reduced loading time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6115793
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61157932018-08-31 An Evaluation of Two Different Broiler Catching Methods Kittelsen, Käthe Elise Granquist, Erik Georg Aunsmo, Agnete Lien Moe, Randi Oppermann Tolo, Elisiv Animals (Basel) Communication SIMPLE SUMMARY: Catching is the process that transfers birds from the poultry house to the transport modules. The catching process and its associated handling may lead to stress, injuries, mortality and reduced welfare for the animals. The aim of this pilot study was to investigate the effect of two manual broiler catching methods. Broilers were either caught by both legs and carried inverted to the drawers or caught under the abdomen and carried in an upright position. Effects of catching method on crating time, number of animals in the drawers, wing and leg fractures, animals on their back in the drawers and broilers dead-on-arrival were investigated. The results showed that the abdominal and upright method was faster and gave a lower and more consistent number of birds per drawer. In addition, this method tended towards fewer wing fractures. No broken legs, birds on their back in the drawers or broilers dead-on-arrival were observed in the study. Catching is a critical phase in the pre-slaughter chain, and this study shows that the catching and carrying method affects broiler welfare. ABSTRACT: Catching is the first step in the pre-slaughter chain for broiler chickens. The process may be detrimental for animal welfare due to the associated handling. The aim of this pilot study was to compare two different methods to manually catch broilers: Catching the broilers by two legs and carrying them inverted (LEGS) or catching the broilers under the abdomen and carrying them in an upright position (UPRIGHT). Wing and leg fractures upon arrival at the abattoir, animal density in the drawers, birds on their back, broilers dead-on-arrival and time to fill the transport modules were investigated. The results showed that mean crating time was shorter in the UPRIGHT method (p = 0.007). There was a tendency for more wing fractures in broilers caught by the LEGS (p = 0.06). The animal density in the drawers was lower and with a smaller range in the UPRIGHT method (p = 0.022). The results indicate that catching the broilers under the abdomen in an upright position may improve broiler welfare in terms of fewer wing fractures, more consistent stocking density in drawers and potentially reduced loading time. MDPI 2018-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6115793/ /pubmed/30111730 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani8080141 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Communication
Kittelsen, Käthe Elise
Granquist, Erik Georg
Aunsmo, Agnete Lien
Moe, Randi Oppermann
Tolo, Elisiv
An Evaluation of Two Different Broiler Catching Methods
title An Evaluation of Two Different Broiler Catching Methods
title_full An Evaluation of Two Different Broiler Catching Methods
title_fullStr An Evaluation of Two Different Broiler Catching Methods
title_full_unstemmed An Evaluation of Two Different Broiler Catching Methods
title_short An Evaluation of Two Different Broiler Catching Methods
title_sort evaluation of two different broiler catching methods
topic Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6115793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30111730
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani8080141
work_keys_str_mv AT kittelsenkatheelise anevaluationoftwodifferentbroilercatchingmethods
AT granquisterikgeorg anevaluationoftwodifferentbroilercatchingmethods
AT aunsmoagnetelien anevaluationoftwodifferentbroilercatchingmethods
AT moerandioppermann anevaluationoftwodifferentbroilercatchingmethods
AT toloelisiv anevaluationoftwodifferentbroilercatchingmethods
AT kittelsenkatheelise evaluationoftwodifferentbroilercatchingmethods
AT granquisterikgeorg evaluationoftwodifferentbroilercatchingmethods
AT aunsmoagnetelien evaluationoftwodifferentbroilercatchingmethods
AT moerandioppermann evaluationoftwodifferentbroilercatchingmethods
AT toloelisiv evaluationoftwodifferentbroilercatchingmethods