Cargando…

Clinical performance of LOCATOR® attachments: A retrospective study with 1–8 years of follow‐up

The use of LOCATOR® attachments in implant‐supported removable dental prostheses (ISRDPs) has been evidenced with conflicting clinical behavior in literature. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the long‐term clinical performance of LOCATOR® attachments by evaluating the frequency of the e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guédat, Christophe, Nagy, Ursina, Schimmel, Martin, Müller, Frauke, Srinivasan, Murali
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6115879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30181910
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.122
_version_ 1783351482833174528
author Guédat, Christophe
Nagy, Ursina
Schimmel, Martin
Müller, Frauke
Srinivasan, Murali
author_facet Guédat, Christophe
Nagy, Ursina
Schimmel, Martin
Müller, Frauke
Srinivasan, Murali
author_sort Guédat, Christophe
collection PubMed
description The use of LOCATOR® attachments in implant‐supported removable dental prostheses (ISRDPs) has been evidenced with conflicting clinical behavior in literature. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the long‐term clinical performance of LOCATOR® attachments by evaluating the frequency of the encountered mechanical complication events (MCEs) and the factors that play a role in attachment wear (AW). The study recruited participants with ISRDPs on LOCATOR® attachments. Clinical parameters, number of MCEs (attachment replacements, attachment loosenings, denture cap‐related events, loss of retention and/or insert, and implant fractures), and AW were recorded. Nonparametric tests were applied for statistical analyses (𝛼=0.05). Baseline demographics for the recruited 47 participants (mean age: 72.0 ± 9.0 years) revealed an implant survival rate of 94.9% (mean observation period: 54.8 months), average peri‐implant probing depths, bleeding on probing scores, and plaque scores of 1.80 ± 1.50 mm, 0.70 ± 0.90, and 0.81 ± 0.90, respectively. MCEs were directly influenced by the time in use (p < 0.001). The most frequently encountered MCEs were loss of retention (p < 0.001) and denture cap‐related complications (p = 0.004). AW was found to be significantly higher in the maxilla than in the mandible (p = 0.028); in the maxilla, the vestibular (p = 0.005) and mesial (p = 0.01) aspects were the most common wear sites. Maxillary implant overdentures revealed more vestibular AW (p = 0.013). In prostheses supported by >3 implants, vestibular (p = 0.046) and mesial (p = 0.032) AW were common. Lingual AW (p = 0.021) was observed more frequently when the support was <3 implants. Loss of retention and AW are the most common complications encountered with LOCATOR® attachments. Therefore, a modification in the attachment design along with an amelioration of the attachment surface may help decrease the maintenance needs and further enhance its clinical performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6115879
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61158792018-09-04 Clinical performance of LOCATOR® attachments: A retrospective study with 1–8 years of follow‐up Guédat, Christophe Nagy, Ursina Schimmel, Martin Müller, Frauke Srinivasan, Murali Clin Exp Dent Res Original Articles The use of LOCATOR® attachments in implant‐supported removable dental prostheses (ISRDPs) has been evidenced with conflicting clinical behavior in literature. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the long‐term clinical performance of LOCATOR® attachments by evaluating the frequency of the encountered mechanical complication events (MCEs) and the factors that play a role in attachment wear (AW). The study recruited participants with ISRDPs on LOCATOR® attachments. Clinical parameters, number of MCEs (attachment replacements, attachment loosenings, denture cap‐related events, loss of retention and/or insert, and implant fractures), and AW were recorded. Nonparametric tests were applied for statistical analyses (𝛼=0.05). Baseline demographics for the recruited 47 participants (mean age: 72.0 ± 9.0 years) revealed an implant survival rate of 94.9% (mean observation period: 54.8 months), average peri‐implant probing depths, bleeding on probing scores, and plaque scores of 1.80 ± 1.50 mm, 0.70 ± 0.90, and 0.81 ± 0.90, respectively. MCEs were directly influenced by the time in use (p < 0.001). The most frequently encountered MCEs were loss of retention (p < 0.001) and denture cap‐related complications (p = 0.004). AW was found to be significantly higher in the maxilla than in the mandible (p = 0.028); in the maxilla, the vestibular (p = 0.005) and mesial (p = 0.01) aspects were the most common wear sites. Maxillary implant overdentures revealed more vestibular AW (p = 0.013). In prostheses supported by >3 implants, vestibular (p = 0.046) and mesial (p = 0.032) AW were common. Lingual AW (p = 0.021) was observed more frequently when the support was <3 implants. Loss of retention and AW are the most common complications encountered with LOCATOR® attachments. Therefore, a modification in the attachment design along with an amelioration of the attachment surface may help decrease the maintenance needs and further enhance its clinical performance. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6115879/ /pubmed/30181910 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.122 Text en ©2018 The Authors. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Guédat, Christophe
Nagy, Ursina
Schimmel, Martin
Müller, Frauke
Srinivasan, Murali
Clinical performance of LOCATOR® attachments: A retrospective study with 1–8 years of follow‐up
title Clinical performance of LOCATOR® attachments: A retrospective study with 1–8 years of follow‐up
title_full Clinical performance of LOCATOR® attachments: A retrospective study with 1–8 years of follow‐up
title_fullStr Clinical performance of LOCATOR® attachments: A retrospective study with 1–8 years of follow‐up
title_full_unstemmed Clinical performance of LOCATOR® attachments: A retrospective study with 1–8 years of follow‐up
title_short Clinical performance of LOCATOR® attachments: A retrospective study with 1–8 years of follow‐up
title_sort clinical performance of locator® attachments: a retrospective study with 1–8 years of follow‐up
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6115879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30181910
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.122
work_keys_str_mv AT guedatchristophe clinicalperformanceoflocatorattachmentsaretrospectivestudywith18yearsoffollowup
AT nagyursina clinicalperformanceoflocatorattachmentsaretrospectivestudywith18yearsoffollowup
AT schimmelmartin clinicalperformanceoflocatorattachmentsaretrospectivestudywith18yearsoffollowup
AT mullerfrauke clinicalperformanceoflocatorattachmentsaretrospectivestudywith18yearsoffollowup
AT srinivasanmurali clinicalperformanceoflocatorattachmentsaretrospectivestudywith18yearsoffollowup