Cargando…

Speciation Theory of Carcinogenesis Explains Karyotypic Individuality and Long Latencies of Cancers

It has been known for over 100 years that cancers have individual karyotypes and arise only years to decades after initiating carcinogens. However, there is still no coherent theory to explain these definitive characteristics of cancer. The prevailing mutation theory holds that cancers are late beca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hirpara, Ankit, Bloomfield, Mathew, Duesberg, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6115917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30096943
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes9080402
_version_ 1783351491251142656
author Hirpara, Ankit
Bloomfield, Mathew
Duesberg, Peter
author_facet Hirpara, Ankit
Bloomfield, Mathew
Duesberg, Peter
author_sort Hirpara, Ankit
collection PubMed
description It has been known for over 100 years that cancers have individual karyotypes and arise only years to decades after initiating carcinogens. However, there is still no coherent theory to explain these definitive characteristics of cancer. The prevailing mutation theory holds that cancers are late because the primary cell must accumulate 3–8 causative mutations to become carcinogenic and that mutations, which induce chromosomal instability (CIN), generate the individual karyotypes of cancers. However, since there is still no proven set of mutations that transforms a normal to a cancer cell, we have recently advanced the theory that carcinogenesis is a form of speciation. This theory predicts carcinogens initiate cancer by inducing aneuploidy, which automatically unbalances thousands of genes and thus catalyzes chain-reactions of progressive aneuploidizations. Over time, these aneuploidizations have two endpoints, either non-viable karyotypes or very rarely karyotypes of new autonomous and immortal cancers. Cancer karyotypes are immortalized despite destabilizing congenital aneuploidy by clonal selections for autonomy—similar to those of conventional species. This theory predicts that the very low probability of converting the karyotype of a normal cell to that of a new autonomous cancer species by random aneuploidizations is the reason for the karyotypic individuality of new cancers and for the long latencies from carcinogens to cancers. In testing this theory, we observed: (1) Addition of mutagenic and non-mutagenic carcinogens to normal human and rat cells generated progressive aneuploidizations months before neoplastic transformation. (2) Sub-cloning of a neoplastic rat clone revealed heritable individual karyotypes, rather than the non-heritable karyotypes predicted by the CIN theory. (3) Analyses of neoplastic and preneoplastic karyotypes unexpectedly identified karyotypes with sets of 3–12 new marker chromosomes without detectable intermediates, consistent with single-step origins. We conclude that the speciation theory explains logically the long latencies from carcinogen exposure and the individuality of cancers. In addition, the theory supports the single-step origins of cancers, because karyotypic autonomy is all-or-nothing. Accordingly, we propose that preneoplastic aneuploidy and clonal neoplastic karyotypes provide more reliable therapeutic indications than current analyses of thousands of mutations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6115917
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61159172018-08-31 Speciation Theory of Carcinogenesis Explains Karyotypic Individuality and Long Latencies of Cancers Hirpara, Ankit Bloomfield, Mathew Duesberg, Peter Genes (Basel) Article It has been known for over 100 years that cancers have individual karyotypes and arise only years to decades after initiating carcinogens. However, there is still no coherent theory to explain these definitive characteristics of cancer. The prevailing mutation theory holds that cancers are late because the primary cell must accumulate 3–8 causative mutations to become carcinogenic and that mutations, which induce chromosomal instability (CIN), generate the individual karyotypes of cancers. However, since there is still no proven set of mutations that transforms a normal to a cancer cell, we have recently advanced the theory that carcinogenesis is a form of speciation. This theory predicts carcinogens initiate cancer by inducing aneuploidy, which automatically unbalances thousands of genes and thus catalyzes chain-reactions of progressive aneuploidizations. Over time, these aneuploidizations have two endpoints, either non-viable karyotypes or very rarely karyotypes of new autonomous and immortal cancers. Cancer karyotypes are immortalized despite destabilizing congenital aneuploidy by clonal selections for autonomy—similar to those of conventional species. This theory predicts that the very low probability of converting the karyotype of a normal cell to that of a new autonomous cancer species by random aneuploidizations is the reason for the karyotypic individuality of new cancers and for the long latencies from carcinogens to cancers. In testing this theory, we observed: (1) Addition of mutagenic and non-mutagenic carcinogens to normal human and rat cells generated progressive aneuploidizations months before neoplastic transformation. (2) Sub-cloning of a neoplastic rat clone revealed heritable individual karyotypes, rather than the non-heritable karyotypes predicted by the CIN theory. (3) Analyses of neoplastic and preneoplastic karyotypes unexpectedly identified karyotypes with sets of 3–12 new marker chromosomes without detectable intermediates, consistent with single-step origins. We conclude that the speciation theory explains logically the long latencies from carcinogen exposure and the individuality of cancers. In addition, the theory supports the single-step origins of cancers, because karyotypic autonomy is all-or-nothing. Accordingly, we propose that preneoplastic aneuploidy and clonal neoplastic karyotypes provide more reliable therapeutic indications than current analyses of thousands of mutations. MDPI 2018-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6115917/ /pubmed/30096943 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes9080402 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hirpara, Ankit
Bloomfield, Mathew
Duesberg, Peter
Speciation Theory of Carcinogenesis Explains Karyotypic Individuality and Long Latencies of Cancers
title Speciation Theory of Carcinogenesis Explains Karyotypic Individuality and Long Latencies of Cancers
title_full Speciation Theory of Carcinogenesis Explains Karyotypic Individuality and Long Latencies of Cancers
title_fullStr Speciation Theory of Carcinogenesis Explains Karyotypic Individuality and Long Latencies of Cancers
title_full_unstemmed Speciation Theory of Carcinogenesis Explains Karyotypic Individuality and Long Latencies of Cancers
title_short Speciation Theory of Carcinogenesis Explains Karyotypic Individuality and Long Latencies of Cancers
title_sort speciation theory of carcinogenesis explains karyotypic individuality and long latencies of cancers
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6115917/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30096943
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes9080402
work_keys_str_mv AT hirparaankit speciationtheoryofcarcinogenesisexplainskaryotypicindividualityandlonglatenciesofcancers
AT bloomfieldmathew speciationtheoryofcarcinogenesisexplainskaryotypicindividualityandlonglatenciesofcancers
AT duesbergpeter speciationtheoryofcarcinogenesisexplainskaryotypicindividualityandlonglatenciesofcancers