Cargando…
Insights into the Voltage Regulation Mechanism of the Pore-Forming Toxin Lysenin
Lysenin, a pore forming toxin (PFT) extracted from Eisenia fetida, inserts voltage-regulated channels into artificial lipid membranes containing sphingomyelin. The voltage-induced gating leads to a strong static hysteresis in conductance, which endows lysenin with molecular memory capabilities. To e...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6115918/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30126104 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins10080334 |
_version_ | 1783351491488120832 |
---|---|
author | Bryant, Sheenah Lynn Clark, Tyler Thomas, Christopher Alex Ware, Kaitlyn Summer Bogard, Andrew Calzacorta, Colleen Prather, Daniel Fologea, Daniel |
author_facet | Bryant, Sheenah Lynn Clark, Tyler Thomas, Christopher Alex Ware, Kaitlyn Summer Bogard, Andrew Calzacorta, Colleen Prather, Daniel Fologea, Daniel |
author_sort | Bryant, Sheenah Lynn |
collection | PubMed |
description | Lysenin, a pore forming toxin (PFT) extracted from Eisenia fetida, inserts voltage-regulated channels into artificial lipid membranes containing sphingomyelin. The voltage-induced gating leads to a strong static hysteresis in conductance, which endows lysenin with molecular memory capabilities. To explain this history-dependent behavior, we hypothesized a gating mechanism that implies the movement of a voltage domain sensor from an aqueous environment into the hydrophobic core of the membrane under the influence of an external electric field. In this work, we employed electrophysiology approaches to investigate the effects of ionic screening elicited by metal cations on the voltage-induced gating and hysteresis in conductance of lysenin channels exposed to oscillatory voltage stimuli. Our experimental data show that screening of the voltage sensor domain strongly affects the voltage regulation only during inactivation (channel closing). In contrast, channel reactivation (reopening) presents a more stable, almost invariant voltage dependency. Additionally, in the presence of anionic Adenosine 5′-triphosphate (ATP), which binds at a different site in the channel’s structure and occludes the conducting pathway, both inactivation and reactivation pathways are significantly affected. Therefore, the movement of the voltage domain sensor into a physically different environment that precludes electrostatically bound ions may be an integral part of the gating mechanism. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6115918 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61159182018-08-31 Insights into the Voltage Regulation Mechanism of the Pore-Forming Toxin Lysenin Bryant, Sheenah Lynn Clark, Tyler Thomas, Christopher Alex Ware, Kaitlyn Summer Bogard, Andrew Calzacorta, Colleen Prather, Daniel Fologea, Daniel Toxins (Basel) Article Lysenin, a pore forming toxin (PFT) extracted from Eisenia fetida, inserts voltage-regulated channels into artificial lipid membranes containing sphingomyelin. The voltage-induced gating leads to a strong static hysteresis in conductance, which endows lysenin with molecular memory capabilities. To explain this history-dependent behavior, we hypothesized a gating mechanism that implies the movement of a voltage domain sensor from an aqueous environment into the hydrophobic core of the membrane under the influence of an external electric field. In this work, we employed electrophysiology approaches to investigate the effects of ionic screening elicited by metal cations on the voltage-induced gating and hysteresis in conductance of lysenin channels exposed to oscillatory voltage stimuli. Our experimental data show that screening of the voltage sensor domain strongly affects the voltage regulation only during inactivation (channel closing). In contrast, channel reactivation (reopening) presents a more stable, almost invariant voltage dependency. Additionally, in the presence of anionic Adenosine 5′-triphosphate (ATP), which binds at a different site in the channel’s structure and occludes the conducting pathway, both inactivation and reactivation pathways are significantly affected. Therefore, the movement of the voltage domain sensor into a physically different environment that precludes electrostatically bound ions may be an integral part of the gating mechanism. MDPI 2018-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6115918/ /pubmed/30126104 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins10080334 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Bryant, Sheenah Lynn Clark, Tyler Thomas, Christopher Alex Ware, Kaitlyn Summer Bogard, Andrew Calzacorta, Colleen Prather, Daniel Fologea, Daniel Insights into the Voltage Regulation Mechanism of the Pore-Forming Toxin Lysenin |
title | Insights into the Voltage Regulation Mechanism of the Pore-Forming Toxin Lysenin |
title_full | Insights into the Voltage Regulation Mechanism of the Pore-Forming Toxin Lysenin |
title_fullStr | Insights into the Voltage Regulation Mechanism of the Pore-Forming Toxin Lysenin |
title_full_unstemmed | Insights into the Voltage Regulation Mechanism of the Pore-Forming Toxin Lysenin |
title_short | Insights into the Voltage Regulation Mechanism of the Pore-Forming Toxin Lysenin |
title_sort | insights into the voltage regulation mechanism of the pore-forming toxin lysenin |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6115918/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30126104 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins10080334 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bryantsheenahlynn insightsintothevoltageregulationmechanismoftheporeformingtoxinlysenin AT clarktyler insightsintothevoltageregulationmechanismoftheporeformingtoxinlysenin AT thomaschristopheralex insightsintothevoltageregulationmechanismoftheporeformingtoxinlysenin AT warekaitlynsummer insightsintothevoltageregulationmechanismoftheporeformingtoxinlysenin AT bogardandrew insightsintothevoltageregulationmechanismoftheporeformingtoxinlysenin AT calzacortacolleen insightsintothevoltageregulationmechanismoftheporeformingtoxinlysenin AT pratherdaniel insightsintothevoltageregulationmechanismoftheporeformingtoxinlysenin AT fologeadaniel insightsintothevoltageregulationmechanismoftheporeformingtoxinlysenin |