Cargando…
Branding Practices on Four Dairies in Kantale, Sri Lanka
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Branding cattle with hot irons is a painful procedure, inflicting severe burns that take weeks to heal. Although Sri Lanka prohibits hot-iron branding, the practice is still common in some areas of the country but has not been described. We observed branding practices on four smallho...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6115924/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30087245 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani8080137 |
_version_ | 1783351492889018368 |
---|---|
author | Adcock, Sarah J. J. Tucker, Cassandra B. Weerasinghe, Gayani Rajapaksha, Eranda |
author_facet | Adcock, Sarah J. J. Tucker, Cassandra B. Weerasinghe, Gayani Rajapaksha, Eranda |
author_sort | Adcock, Sarah J. J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: Branding cattle with hot irons is a painful procedure, inflicting severe burns that take weeks to heal. Although Sri Lanka prohibits hot-iron branding, the practice is still common in some areas of the country but has not been described. We observed branding practices on four smallholder farms and identified welfare concerns and challenges impeding adoption of alternative methods of identification, such as ear tags. Farmers used multiple irons to mark their initials and, in some cases, their address, with the largest brands extending across the ribs and hip. Farmers did not consider ear tags a viable alternative to hot-iron branding because of issues with security and tag retention. Hot-iron branding raises serious animal welfare concerns and efforts to introduce more welfare-friendly alternatives are needed. ABSTRACT: Hot-iron branding is illegal in Sri Lanka, but is still commonly used to identify dairy herds in extensive farming systems, which are primarily located in the country’s Dry Zone. Despite the negative welfare implications of this practice, there is no written documentation of branding in this region. We observed branding on four smallholder farms in Kantale, Eastern Province to understand the welfare implications associated with the procedure and challenges limiting the uptake of more welfare-friendly alternatives, such as ear tagging. Areas of welfare concern included the duration of restraint, the size and location of the brand, and the absence of pain relief. Animals were restrained with rope for an average duration of 12 min (range 8–17 min). Farmers used multiple running irons to mark their initials and, in some cases, their address, with the largest brands extending across the ribs and hip. Three farmers applied coconut or neem oil topically to the brand after performing the procedure. No analgesics were given before or after branding. Farmers reported that poor ear tag retention in extensive systems and theft were the main factors impeding the uptake of alternative forms of identification. Branding is also practiced as part of traditional medicine in some cases. Given the clear evidence that hot-iron branding impairs animal welfare and there is no evidence that this can be improved, alternative identification methods are needed, both in Sri Lanka, as well as in other countries engaging in this practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6115924 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61159242018-08-31 Branding Practices on Four Dairies in Kantale, Sri Lanka Adcock, Sarah J. J. Tucker, Cassandra B. Weerasinghe, Gayani Rajapaksha, Eranda Animals (Basel) Communication SIMPLE SUMMARY: Branding cattle with hot irons is a painful procedure, inflicting severe burns that take weeks to heal. Although Sri Lanka prohibits hot-iron branding, the practice is still common in some areas of the country but has not been described. We observed branding practices on four smallholder farms and identified welfare concerns and challenges impeding adoption of alternative methods of identification, such as ear tags. Farmers used multiple irons to mark their initials and, in some cases, their address, with the largest brands extending across the ribs and hip. Farmers did not consider ear tags a viable alternative to hot-iron branding because of issues with security and tag retention. Hot-iron branding raises serious animal welfare concerns and efforts to introduce more welfare-friendly alternatives are needed. ABSTRACT: Hot-iron branding is illegal in Sri Lanka, but is still commonly used to identify dairy herds in extensive farming systems, which are primarily located in the country’s Dry Zone. Despite the negative welfare implications of this practice, there is no written documentation of branding in this region. We observed branding on four smallholder farms in Kantale, Eastern Province to understand the welfare implications associated with the procedure and challenges limiting the uptake of more welfare-friendly alternatives, such as ear tagging. Areas of welfare concern included the duration of restraint, the size and location of the brand, and the absence of pain relief. Animals were restrained with rope for an average duration of 12 min (range 8–17 min). Farmers used multiple running irons to mark their initials and, in some cases, their address, with the largest brands extending across the ribs and hip. Three farmers applied coconut or neem oil topically to the brand after performing the procedure. No analgesics were given before or after branding. Farmers reported that poor ear tag retention in extensive systems and theft were the main factors impeding the uptake of alternative forms of identification. Branding is also practiced as part of traditional medicine in some cases. Given the clear evidence that hot-iron branding impairs animal welfare and there is no evidence that this can be improved, alternative identification methods are needed, both in Sri Lanka, as well as in other countries engaging in this practice. MDPI 2018-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6115924/ /pubmed/30087245 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani8080137 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Communication Adcock, Sarah J. J. Tucker, Cassandra B. Weerasinghe, Gayani Rajapaksha, Eranda Branding Practices on Four Dairies in Kantale, Sri Lanka |
title | Branding Practices on Four Dairies in Kantale, Sri Lanka |
title_full | Branding Practices on Four Dairies in Kantale, Sri Lanka |
title_fullStr | Branding Practices on Four Dairies in Kantale, Sri Lanka |
title_full_unstemmed | Branding Practices on Four Dairies in Kantale, Sri Lanka |
title_short | Branding Practices on Four Dairies in Kantale, Sri Lanka |
title_sort | branding practices on four dairies in kantale, sri lanka |
topic | Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6115924/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30087245 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani8080137 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT adcocksarahjj brandingpracticesonfourdairiesinkantalesrilanka AT tuckercassandrab brandingpracticesonfourdairiesinkantalesrilanka AT weerasinghegayani brandingpracticesonfourdairiesinkantalesrilanka AT rajapakshaeranda brandingpracticesonfourdairiesinkantalesrilanka |