Cargando…

Branding Practices on Four Dairies in Kantale, Sri Lanka

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Branding cattle with hot irons is a painful procedure, inflicting severe burns that take weeks to heal. Although Sri Lanka prohibits hot-iron branding, the practice is still common in some areas of the country but has not been described. We observed branding practices on four smallho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adcock, Sarah J. J., Tucker, Cassandra B., Weerasinghe, Gayani, Rajapaksha, Eranda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6115924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30087245
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani8080137
_version_ 1783351492889018368
author Adcock, Sarah J. J.
Tucker, Cassandra B.
Weerasinghe, Gayani
Rajapaksha, Eranda
author_facet Adcock, Sarah J. J.
Tucker, Cassandra B.
Weerasinghe, Gayani
Rajapaksha, Eranda
author_sort Adcock, Sarah J. J.
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Branding cattle with hot irons is a painful procedure, inflicting severe burns that take weeks to heal. Although Sri Lanka prohibits hot-iron branding, the practice is still common in some areas of the country but has not been described. We observed branding practices on four smallholder farms and identified welfare concerns and challenges impeding adoption of alternative methods of identification, such as ear tags. Farmers used multiple irons to mark their initials and, in some cases, their address, with the largest brands extending across the ribs and hip. Farmers did not consider ear tags a viable alternative to hot-iron branding because of issues with security and tag retention. Hot-iron branding raises serious animal welfare concerns and efforts to introduce more welfare-friendly alternatives are needed. ABSTRACT: Hot-iron branding is illegal in Sri Lanka, but is still commonly used to identify dairy herds in extensive farming systems, which are primarily located in the country’s Dry Zone. Despite the negative welfare implications of this practice, there is no written documentation of branding in this region. We observed branding on four smallholder farms in Kantale, Eastern Province to understand the welfare implications associated with the procedure and challenges limiting the uptake of more welfare-friendly alternatives, such as ear tagging. Areas of welfare concern included the duration of restraint, the size and location of the brand, and the absence of pain relief. Animals were restrained with rope for an average duration of 12 min (range 8–17 min). Farmers used multiple running irons to mark their initials and, in some cases, their address, with the largest brands extending across the ribs and hip. Three farmers applied coconut or neem oil topically to the brand after performing the procedure. No analgesics were given before or after branding. Farmers reported that poor ear tag retention in extensive systems and theft were the main factors impeding the uptake of alternative forms of identification. Branding is also practiced as part of traditional medicine in some cases. Given the clear evidence that hot-iron branding impairs animal welfare and there is no evidence that this can be improved, alternative identification methods are needed, both in Sri Lanka, as well as in other countries engaging in this practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6115924
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61159242018-08-31 Branding Practices on Four Dairies in Kantale, Sri Lanka Adcock, Sarah J. J. Tucker, Cassandra B. Weerasinghe, Gayani Rajapaksha, Eranda Animals (Basel) Communication SIMPLE SUMMARY: Branding cattle with hot irons is a painful procedure, inflicting severe burns that take weeks to heal. Although Sri Lanka prohibits hot-iron branding, the practice is still common in some areas of the country but has not been described. We observed branding practices on four smallholder farms and identified welfare concerns and challenges impeding adoption of alternative methods of identification, such as ear tags. Farmers used multiple irons to mark their initials and, in some cases, their address, with the largest brands extending across the ribs and hip. Farmers did not consider ear tags a viable alternative to hot-iron branding because of issues with security and tag retention. Hot-iron branding raises serious animal welfare concerns and efforts to introduce more welfare-friendly alternatives are needed. ABSTRACT: Hot-iron branding is illegal in Sri Lanka, but is still commonly used to identify dairy herds in extensive farming systems, which are primarily located in the country’s Dry Zone. Despite the negative welfare implications of this practice, there is no written documentation of branding in this region. We observed branding on four smallholder farms in Kantale, Eastern Province to understand the welfare implications associated with the procedure and challenges limiting the uptake of more welfare-friendly alternatives, such as ear tagging. Areas of welfare concern included the duration of restraint, the size and location of the brand, and the absence of pain relief. Animals were restrained with rope for an average duration of 12 min (range 8–17 min). Farmers used multiple running irons to mark their initials and, in some cases, their address, with the largest brands extending across the ribs and hip. Three farmers applied coconut or neem oil topically to the brand after performing the procedure. No analgesics were given before or after branding. Farmers reported that poor ear tag retention in extensive systems and theft were the main factors impeding the uptake of alternative forms of identification. Branding is also practiced as part of traditional medicine in some cases. Given the clear evidence that hot-iron branding impairs animal welfare and there is no evidence that this can be improved, alternative identification methods are needed, both in Sri Lanka, as well as in other countries engaging in this practice. MDPI 2018-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6115924/ /pubmed/30087245 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani8080137 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Communication
Adcock, Sarah J. J.
Tucker, Cassandra B.
Weerasinghe, Gayani
Rajapaksha, Eranda
Branding Practices on Four Dairies in Kantale, Sri Lanka
title Branding Practices on Four Dairies in Kantale, Sri Lanka
title_full Branding Practices on Four Dairies in Kantale, Sri Lanka
title_fullStr Branding Practices on Four Dairies in Kantale, Sri Lanka
title_full_unstemmed Branding Practices on Four Dairies in Kantale, Sri Lanka
title_short Branding Practices on Four Dairies in Kantale, Sri Lanka
title_sort branding practices on four dairies in kantale, sri lanka
topic Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6115924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30087245
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani8080137
work_keys_str_mv AT adcocksarahjj brandingpracticesonfourdairiesinkantalesrilanka
AT tuckercassandrab brandingpracticesonfourdairiesinkantalesrilanka
AT weerasinghegayani brandingpracticesonfourdairiesinkantalesrilanka
AT rajapakshaeranda brandingpracticesonfourdairiesinkantalesrilanka