Cargando…

Uptake of Australia’s Health Star Rating System

In June 2014, Australia and New Zealand adopted a voluntary front-of-pack nutrition labelling scheme in the form of the Health Star Rating (HSR) system. Our aim was to assess its uptake in Australia while a formal five-year review of the system is underway. Numbers and proportions of products eligib...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jones, Alexandra, Shahid, Maria, Neal, Bruce
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6115967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30061512
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu10080997
_version_ 1783351502998339584
author Jones, Alexandra
Shahid, Maria
Neal, Bruce
author_facet Jones, Alexandra
Shahid, Maria
Neal, Bruce
author_sort Jones, Alexandra
collection PubMed
description In June 2014, Australia and New Zealand adopted a voluntary front-of-pack nutrition labelling scheme in the form of the Health Star Rating (HSR) system. Our aim was to assess its uptake in Australia while a formal five-year review of the system is underway. Numbers and proportions of products eligible to carry a HSR were recorded each year between 2014 and 2017 as part of an annual survey of four large Australian retail outlets. Mean HSR values were determined for products that were and were not labelled with a HSR logo, and summary data presented overall, by HSR score, by major food category, and for leading manufacturers. Results show that uptake is increasing: HSR appeared on 4348/15,767 (28%) of eligible products in 2017 and has now appeared on 7922 products since implementation. Of those products displaying a HSR logo, more than three-quarters (76.4%) displayed a HSR of ≥3.0. Products displaying a HSR logo had a higher mean HSR (3.4), compared to products not displaying a HSR logo (2.7). Uptake was highest on convenience foods (44%), cereals (36.7%), and fruit and vegetable products (35.9%). More than 100 manufacturers were using the system, but retailers Coles, Woolworths and Aldi were together responsible for 54% of uptake. For all except Coles, Woolworths and Campbell Arnott’s, the mean HSR of products displaying a logo on pack was higher than products made by that manufacturer not showing a HSR logo. We conclude that to ensure the consistent and widespread uptake required for consumers to make informed food purchases, HSR should be made mandatory at the conclusion of the five-year review.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6115967
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61159672018-09-04 Uptake of Australia’s Health Star Rating System Jones, Alexandra Shahid, Maria Neal, Bruce Nutrients Article In June 2014, Australia and New Zealand adopted a voluntary front-of-pack nutrition labelling scheme in the form of the Health Star Rating (HSR) system. Our aim was to assess its uptake in Australia while a formal five-year review of the system is underway. Numbers and proportions of products eligible to carry a HSR were recorded each year between 2014 and 2017 as part of an annual survey of four large Australian retail outlets. Mean HSR values were determined for products that were and were not labelled with a HSR logo, and summary data presented overall, by HSR score, by major food category, and for leading manufacturers. Results show that uptake is increasing: HSR appeared on 4348/15,767 (28%) of eligible products in 2017 and has now appeared on 7922 products since implementation. Of those products displaying a HSR logo, more than three-quarters (76.4%) displayed a HSR of ≥3.0. Products displaying a HSR logo had a higher mean HSR (3.4), compared to products not displaying a HSR logo (2.7). Uptake was highest on convenience foods (44%), cereals (36.7%), and fruit and vegetable products (35.9%). More than 100 manufacturers were using the system, but retailers Coles, Woolworths and Aldi were together responsible for 54% of uptake. For all except Coles, Woolworths and Campbell Arnott’s, the mean HSR of products displaying a logo on pack was higher than products made by that manufacturer not showing a HSR logo. We conclude that to ensure the consistent and widespread uptake required for consumers to make informed food purchases, HSR should be made mandatory at the conclusion of the five-year review. MDPI 2018-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6115967/ /pubmed/30061512 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu10080997 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Jones, Alexandra
Shahid, Maria
Neal, Bruce
Uptake of Australia’s Health Star Rating System
title Uptake of Australia’s Health Star Rating System
title_full Uptake of Australia’s Health Star Rating System
title_fullStr Uptake of Australia’s Health Star Rating System
title_full_unstemmed Uptake of Australia’s Health Star Rating System
title_short Uptake of Australia’s Health Star Rating System
title_sort uptake of australia’s health star rating system
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6115967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30061512
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu10080997
work_keys_str_mv AT jonesalexandra uptakeofaustraliashealthstarratingsystem
AT shahidmaria uptakeofaustraliashealthstarratingsystem
AT nealbruce uptakeofaustraliashealthstarratingsystem