Cargando…

Feasibility of Reviewing Digital Food Images for Dietary Assessment among Nutrition Professionals

Validity of image-assisted and image-based dietary assessment methods relies on the accuracy of portion size estimation based on food images. However, little is known on the ability of nutrition professionals in assessing dietary intake based on digital food images. This study aims to examine the ab...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ainaa Fatehah, Ayob, Poh, Bee Koon, Nik Shanita, Safii, Wong, Jyh Eiin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6115988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30060528
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu10080984
_version_ 1783351507914063872
author Ainaa Fatehah, Ayob
Poh, Bee Koon
Nik Shanita, Safii
Wong, Jyh Eiin
author_facet Ainaa Fatehah, Ayob
Poh, Bee Koon
Nik Shanita, Safii
Wong, Jyh Eiin
author_sort Ainaa Fatehah, Ayob
collection PubMed
description Validity of image-assisted and image-based dietary assessment methods relies on the accuracy of portion size estimation based on food images. However, little is known on the ability of nutrition professionals in assessing dietary intake based on digital food images. This study aims to examine the ability of nutrition professionals in reviewing food images with regard to food item identification and portion size estimation. Thirty-eight nutritionists, dietitians, and nutrition researchers participated in this study. Through an online questionnaire, participants’ accuracy in identifying food items and estimating portion sizes of two sets of digital food images presenting a meal on a plate (Image PL) and in a bowl (Image BW) were tested. Participants reported higher accuracy in interpreting Image BW compared to Image PL, both in terms of accuracy in food identification (75.3 ± 17.6 vs. 68.9 ± 17.1%) and percentage difference in portion size estimation (44.3 ± 16.6 vs. 47.6 ± 21.2%). Weight of raw vegetables was significantly underestimated (−45.1 ± 22.8% vs. −21.2 ± 37.4%), while drink was significantly overestimated (40.1 ± 45.8% vs. 26.1 ± 32.2) in both images. Less than one-third of the participants estimated portion size within 10% of actual weight for Image PL (23.7%) and Image BW (32.3%). Accuracy of nutrition professionals in reviewing food images could be further improved with training on better perception of portion sizes from images.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6115988
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61159882018-09-04 Feasibility of Reviewing Digital Food Images for Dietary Assessment among Nutrition Professionals Ainaa Fatehah, Ayob Poh, Bee Koon Nik Shanita, Safii Wong, Jyh Eiin Nutrients Article Validity of image-assisted and image-based dietary assessment methods relies on the accuracy of portion size estimation based on food images. However, little is known on the ability of nutrition professionals in assessing dietary intake based on digital food images. This study aims to examine the ability of nutrition professionals in reviewing food images with regard to food item identification and portion size estimation. Thirty-eight nutritionists, dietitians, and nutrition researchers participated in this study. Through an online questionnaire, participants’ accuracy in identifying food items and estimating portion sizes of two sets of digital food images presenting a meal on a plate (Image PL) and in a bowl (Image BW) were tested. Participants reported higher accuracy in interpreting Image BW compared to Image PL, both in terms of accuracy in food identification (75.3 ± 17.6 vs. 68.9 ± 17.1%) and percentage difference in portion size estimation (44.3 ± 16.6 vs. 47.6 ± 21.2%). Weight of raw vegetables was significantly underestimated (−45.1 ± 22.8% vs. −21.2 ± 37.4%), while drink was significantly overestimated (40.1 ± 45.8% vs. 26.1 ± 32.2) in both images. Less than one-third of the participants estimated portion size within 10% of actual weight for Image PL (23.7%) and Image BW (32.3%). Accuracy of nutrition professionals in reviewing food images could be further improved with training on better perception of portion sizes from images. MDPI 2018-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6115988/ /pubmed/30060528 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu10080984 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ainaa Fatehah, Ayob
Poh, Bee Koon
Nik Shanita, Safii
Wong, Jyh Eiin
Feasibility of Reviewing Digital Food Images for Dietary Assessment among Nutrition Professionals
title Feasibility of Reviewing Digital Food Images for Dietary Assessment among Nutrition Professionals
title_full Feasibility of Reviewing Digital Food Images for Dietary Assessment among Nutrition Professionals
title_fullStr Feasibility of Reviewing Digital Food Images for Dietary Assessment among Nutrition Professionals
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility of Reviewing Digital Food Images for Dietary Assessment among Nutrition Professionals
title_short Feasibility of Reviewing Digital Food Images for Dietary Assessment among Nutrition Professionals
title_sort feasibility of reviewing digital food images for dietary assessment among nutrition professionals
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6115988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30060528
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu10080984
work_keys_str_mv AT ainaafatehahayob feasibilityofreviewingdigitalfoodimagesfordietaryassessmentamongnutritionprofessionals
AT pohbeekoon feasibilityofreviewingdigitalfoodimagesfordietaryassessmentamongnutritionprofessionals
AT nikshanitasafii feasibilityofreviewingdigitalfoodimagesfordietaryassessmentamongnutritionprofessionals
AT wongjyheiin feasibilityofreviewingdigitalfoodimagesfordietaryassessmentamongnutritionprofessionals