Cargando…
Cancer screening inequities in a time of primary care reform: a population-based longitudinal study in Ontario, Canada
BACKGROUND: Primary care has been reformed in recent years in Ontario, Canada, with a move away from traditional fee-for-service to enhanced fee-for-service and capitation-based models. It is unclear how new models have affected disparities in cancer screening. We evaluated whether Ontario’s enhance...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6116433/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30157772 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-018-0827-1 |
_version_ | 1783351605410660352 |
---|---|
author | Lofters, Aisha K. Mark, Amy Taljaard, Monica Green, Michael E. Glazier, Richard H. Dahrouge, Simone |
author_facet | Lofters, Aisha K. Mark, Amy Taljaard, Monica Green, Michael E. Glazier, Richard H. Dahrouge, Simone |
author_sort | Lofters, Aisha K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Primary care has been reformed in recent years in Ontario, Canada, with a move away from traditional fee-for-service to enhanced fee-for-service and capitation-based models. It is unclear how new models have affected disparities in cancer screening. We evaluated whether Ontario’s enhanced fee-for-service model was associated with a change in the gaps in cancer screening for people living with low income and people who are foreign-born. METHODS: We conducted a population-based longitudinal analysis from 2002 to 2013 of Ontario family physicians who transitioned from traditional fee-for-service to enhanced fee-for-service. The binary outcomes of interest were adherence to cervical, breast and colorectal cancer screening recommendations. Outcomes were analyzed using mixed-effects logistic regression. Analyses produced annual odds ratios comparing the odds of being up-to-date for screening among patients in enhanced fee-for-service versus patients in traditional fee-for-service for each social stratum separately. We calculated the ratios of stratum-specific odds ratios to assess whether the transition from traditional to enhanced fee-for-service was associated with a change in screening gaps between immigrants and long-term residents, and between people in the lowest and highest neighbourhood income quintiles. RESULTS: Throughout the study period, cancer screening was consistently lower among immigrants and among people in the lowest income quintile. Transition to enhanced fee-for-service was generally associated with increased screening uptake for all, however for most years, ratios of ratios were significantly less than 1 for all three cancer screening types, indicating that there was a widening of the screening gap between immigrants and long-term residents and between people living in the lowest vs. highest income quintile associated with transitions. CONCLUSION: The transition to enhanced fee-for-service in Ontario was generally associated with a widening of screening inequities for foreign-born and low-income patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6116433 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61164332018-09-04 Cancer screening inequities in a time of primary care reform: a population-based longitudinal study in Ontario, Canada Lofters, Aisha K. Mark, Amy Taljaard, Monica Green, Michael E. Glazier, Richard H. Dahrouge, Simone BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Primary care has been reformed in recent years in Ontario, Canada, with a move away from traditional fee-for-service to enhanced fee-for-service and capitation-based models. It is unclear how new models have affected disparities in cancer screening. We evaluated whether Ontario’s enhanced fee-for-service model was associated with a change in the gaps in cancer screening for people living with low income and people who are foreign-born. METHODS: We conducted a population-based longitudinal analysis from 2002 to 2013 of Ontario family physicians who transitioned from traditional fee-for-service to enhanced fee-for-service. The binary outcomes of interest were adherence to cervical, breast and colorectal cancer screening recommendations. Outcomes were analyzed using mixed-effects logistic regression. Analyses produced annual odds ratios comparing the odds of being up-to-date for screening among patients in enhanced fee-for-service versus patients in traditional fee-for-service for each social stratum separately. We calculated the ratios of stratum-specific odds ratios to assess whether the transition from traditional to enhanced fee-for-service was associated with a change in screening gaps between immigrants and long-term residents, and between people in the lowest and highest neighbourhood income quintiles. RESULTS: Throughout the study period, cancer screening was consistently lower among immigrants and among people in the lowest income quintile. Transition to enhanced fee-for-service was generally associated with increased screening uptake for all, however for most years, ratios of ratios were significantly less than 1 for all three cancer screening types, indicating that there was a widening of the screening gap between immigrants and long-term residents and between people living in the lowest vs. highest income quintile associated with transitions. CONCLUSION: The transition to enhanced fee-for-service in Ontario was generally associated with a widening of screening inequities for foreign-born and low-income patients. BioMed Central 2018-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6116433/ /pubmed/30157772 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-018-0827-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lofters, Aisha K. Mark, Amy Taljaard, Monica Green, Michael E. Glazier, Richard H. Dahrouge, Simone Cancer screening inequities in a time of primary care reform: a population-based longitudinal study in Ontario, Canada |
title | Cancer screening inequities in a time of primary care reform: a population-based longitudinal study in Ontario, Canada |
title_full | Cancer screening inequities in a time of primary care reform: a population-based longitudinal study in Ontario, Canada |
title_fullStr | Cancer screening inequities in a time of primary care reform: a population-based longitudinal study in Ontario, Canada |
title_full_unstemmed | Cancer screening inequities in a time of primary care reform: a population-based longitudinal study in Ontario, Canada |
title_short | Cancer screening inequities in a time of primary care reform: a population-based longitudinal study in Ontario, Canada |
title_sort | cancer screening inequities in a time of primary care reform: a population-based longitudinal study in ontario, canada |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6116433/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30157772 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-018-0827-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT loftersaishak cancerscreeninginequitiesinatimeofprimarycarereformapopulationbasedlongitudinalstudyinontariocanada AT markamy cancerscreeninginequitiesinatimeofprimarycarereformapopulationbasedlongitudinalstudyinontariocanada AT taljaardmonica cancerscreeninginequitiesinatimeofprimarycarereformapopulationbasedlongitudinalstudyinontariocanada AT greenmichaele cancerscreeninginequitiesinatimeofprimarycarereformapopulationbasedlongitudinalstudyinontariocanada AT glazierrichardh cancerscreeninginequitiesinatimeofprimarycarereformapopulationbasedlongitudinalstudyinontariocanada AT dahrougesimone cancerscreeninginequitiesinatimeofprimarycarereformapopulationbasedlongitudinalstudyinontariocanada |