Cargando…

Cancer screening inequities in a time of primary care reform: a population-based longitudinal study in Ontario, Canada

BACKGROUND: Primary care has been reformed in recent years in Ontario, Canada, with a move away from traditional fee-for-service to enhanced fee-for-service and capitation-based models. It is unclear how new models have affected disparities in cancer screening. We evaluated whether Ontario’s enhance...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lofters, Aisha K., Mark, Amy, Taljaard, Monica, Green, Michael E., Glazier, Richard H., Dahrouge, Simone
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6116433/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30157772
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-018-0827-1
_version_ 1783351605410660352
author Lofters, Aisha K.
Mark, Amy
Taljaard, Monica
Green, Michael E.
Glazier, Richard H.
Dahrouge, Simone
author_facet Lofters, Aisha K.
Mark, Amy
Taljaard, Monica
Green, Michael E.
Glazier, Richard H.
Dahrouge, Simone
author_sort Lofters, Aisha K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Primary care has been reformed in recent years in Ontario, Canada, with a move away from traditional fee-for-service to enhanced fee-for-service and capitation-based models. It is unclear how new models have affected disparities in cancer screening. We evaluated whether Ontario’s enhanced fee-for-service model was associated with a change in the gaps in cancer screening for people living with low income and people who are foreign-born. METHODS: We conducted a population-based longitudinal analysis from 2002 to 2013 of Ontario family physicians who transitioned from traditional fee-for-service to enhanced fee-for-service. The binary outcomes of interest were adherence to cervical, breast and colorectal cancer screening recommendations. Outcomes were analyzed using mixed-effects logistic regression. Analyses produced annual odds ratios comparing the odds of being up-to-date for screening among patients in enhanced fee-for-service versus patients in traditional fee-for-service for each social stratum separately. We calculated the ratios of stratum-specific odds ratios to assess whether the transition from traditional to enhanced fee-for-service was associated with a change in screening gaps between immigrants and long-term residents, and between people in the lowest and highest neighbourhood income quintiles. RESULTS: Throughout the study period, cancer screening was consistently lower among immigrants and among people in the lowest income quintile. Transition to enhanced fee-for-service was generally associated with increased screening uptake for all, however for most years, ratios of ratios were significantly less than 1 for all three cancer screening types, indicating that there was a widening of the screening gap between immigrants and long-term residents and between people living in the lowest vs. highest income quintile associated with transitions. CONCLUSION: The transition to enhanced fee-for-service in Ontario was generally associated with a widening of screening inequities for foreign-born and low-income patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6116433
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61164332018-09-04 Cancer screening inequities in a time of primary care reform: a population-based longitudinal study in Ontario, Canada Lofters, Aisha K. Mark, Amy Taljaard, Monica Green, Michael E. Glazier, Richard H. Dahrouge, Simone BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Primary care has been reformed in recent years in Ontario, Canada, with a move away from traditional fee-for-service to enhanced fee-for-service and capitation-based models. It is unclear how new models have affected disparities in cancer screening. We evaluated whether Ontario’s enhanced fee-for-service model was associated with a change in the gaps in cancer screening for people living with low income and people who are foreign-born. METHODS: We conducted a population-based longitudinal analysis from 2002 to 2013 of Ontario family physicians who transitioned from traditional fee-for-service to enhanced fee-for-service. The binary outcomes of interest were adherence to cervical, breast and colorectal cancer screening recommendations. Outcomes were analyzed using mixed-effects logistic regression. Analyses produced annual odds ratios comparing the odds of being up-to-date for screening among patients in enhanced fee-for-service versus patients in traditional fee-for-service for each social stratum separately. We calculated the ratios of stratum-specific odds ratios to assess whether the transition from traditional to enhanced fee-for-service was associated with a change in screening gaps between immigrants and long-term residents, and between people in the lowest and highest neighbourhood income quintiles. RESULTS: Throughout the study period, cancer screening was consistently lower among immigrants and among people in the lowest income quintile. Transition to enhanced fee-for-service was generally associated with increased screening uptake for all, however for most years, ratios of ratios were significantly less than 1 for all three cancer screening types, indicating that there was a widening of the screening gap between immigrants and long-term residents and between people living in the lowest vs. highest income quintile associated with transitions. CONCLUSION: The transition to enhanced fee-for-service in Ontario was generally associated with a widening of screening inequities for foreign-born and low-income patients. BioMed Central 2018-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6116433/ /pubmed/30157772 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-018-0827-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lofters, Aisha K.
Mark, Amy
Taljaard, Monica
Green, Michael E.
Glazier, Richard H.
Dahrouge, Simone
Cancer screening inequities in a time of primary care reform: a population-based longitudinal study in Ontario, Canada
title Cancer screening inequities in a time of primary care reform: a population-based longitudinal study in Ontario, Canada
title_full Cancer screening inequities in a time of primary care reform: a population-based longitudinal study in Ontario, Canada
title_fullStr Cancer screening inequities in a time of primary care reform: a population-based longitudinal study in Ontario, Canada
title_full_unstemmed Cancer screening inequities in a time of primary care reform: a population-based longitudinal study in Ontario, Canada
title_short Cancer screening inequities in a time of primary care reform: a population-based longitudinal study in Ontario, Canada
title_sort cancer screening inequities in a time of primary care reform: a population-based longitudinal study in ontario, canada
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6116433/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30157772
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-018-0827-1
work_keys_str_mv AT loftersaishak cancerscreeninginequitiesinatimeofprimarycarereformapopulationbasedlongitudinalstudyinontariocanada
AT markamy cancerscreeninginequitiesinatimeofprimarycarereformapopulationbasedlongitudinalstudyinontariocanada
AT taljaardmonica cancerscreeninginequitiesinatimeofprimarycarereformapopulationbasedlongitudinalstudyinontariocanada
AT greenmichaele cancerscreeninginequitiesinatimeofprimarycarereformapopulationbasedlongitudinalstudyinontariocanada
AT glazierrichardh cancerscreeninginequitiesinatimeofprimarycarereformapopulationbasedlongitudinalstudyinontariocanada
AT dahrougesimone cancerscreeninginequitiesinatimeofprimarycarereformapopulationbasedlongitudinalstudyinontariocanada