Cargando…

Sperm origins and concentration do not impact the clinical outcomes in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles

In the present study, we evaluated the impact of sperm origins and concentration on the clinical outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles. A total of 1201 ICSI cycles were retrospectively analyzed for male azoospermia or oligozoospermia between January 2015 and December 2015 in the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Cen, Zhou, Ze-Hong, Zheng, Dan-Ni, Xu, Xiao-Fei, Huang, Jin, Lian, Ying, Qiao, Jie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6116677/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29798938
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aja.aja_27_18
_version_ 1783351637116452864
author Yang, Cen
Zhou, Ze-Hong
Zheng, Dan-Ni
Xu, Xiao-Fei
Huang, Jin
Lian, Ying
Qiao, Jie
author_facet Yang, Cen
Zhou, Ze-Hong
Zheng, Dan-Ni
Xu, Xiao-Fei
Huang, Jin
Lian, Ying
Qiao, Jie
author_sort Yang, Cen
collection PubMed
description In the present study, we evaluated the impact of sperm origins and concentration on the clinical outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles. A total of 1201 ICSI cycles were retrospectively analyzed for male azoospermia or oligozoospermia between January 2015 and December 2015 in the Peking University Third Hospital. Patients were divided into three groups (Group 1 vs Group 2/3; surgically extracted sperm vs ejaculated sperms): Group 1 included 343 ICSI cycles and Group 2 analyzed 388 cycles on semen with sperm concentration <5 × 10(6) ml(−1) (severe oligozoospermia group). Group 3 included 470 cycles with sperm concentration between 5 × 10(6) ml(−1) and 15 × 10(6) ml(−1) (mild oligozoospermia group). Fertilization rates, clinical pregnancy rates, and live birth rates were analyzed and compared among groups of different semen origins and concentrations on the oocyte retrieval day. Group 2 showed a lower fertilization rate than Group 3 (62.9% ± 21.6% vs 66.8% ± 22.1%,P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in clinical pregnancy rate per transfer (51.3%, 46.7%, and 50.0%, respectively), live birth rate per transfer (44.4%, 40.9%, and 41.4%, respectively), accumulative live birth rate (58.3%, 51.0%, and 52.1%, respectively), twin birth rate (18.4%, 10.6%, and 12.6%, respectively), and birth defects rate (0, 0.3%, and 0.2%, respectively) among three groups. The results of this study indicated that sperm origins and concentration do not impact the clinical outcomes in ICSI cycles.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6116677
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61166772018-09-05 Sperm origins and concentration do not impact the clinical outcomes in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles Yang, Cen Zhou, Ze-Hong Zheng, Dan-Ni Xu, Xiao-Fei Huang, Jin Lian, Ying Qiao, Jie Asian J Androl Original Article In the present study, we evaluated the impact of sperm origins and concentration on the clinical outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles. A total of 1201 ICSI cycles were retrospectively analyzed for male azoospermia or oligozoospermia between January 2015 and December 2015 in the Peking University Third Hospital. Patients were divided into three groups (Group 1 vs Group 2/3; surgically extracted sperm vs ejaculated sperms): Group 1 included 343 ICSI cycles and Group 2 analyzed 388 cycles on semen with sperm concentration <5 × 10(6) ml(−1) (severe oligozoospermia group). Group 3 included 470 cycles with sperm concentration between 5 × 10(6) ml(−1) and 15 × 10(6) ml(−1) (mild oligozoospermia group). Fertilization rates, clinical pregnancy rates, and live birth rates were analyzed and compared among groups of different semen origins and concentrations on the oocyte retrieval day. Group 2 showed a lower fertilization rate than Group 3 (62.9% ± 21.6% vs 66.8% ± 22.1%,P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in clinical pregnancy rate per transfer (51.3%, 46.7%, and 50.0%, respectively), live birth rate per transfer (44.4%, 40.9%, and 41.4%, respectively), accumulative live birth rate (58.3%, 51.0%, and 52.1%, respectively), twin birth rate (18.4%, 10.6%, and 12.6%, respectively), and birth defects rate (0, 0.3%, and 0.2%, respectively) among three groups. The results of this study indicated that sperm origins and concentration do not impact the clinical outcomes in ICSI cycles. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 2018-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6116677/ /pubmed/29798938 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aja.aja_27_18 Text en Copyright: © The Author(s)(2018) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Yang, Cen
Zhou, Ze-Hong
Zheng, Dan-Ni
Xu, Xiao-Fei
Huang, Jin
Lian, Ying
Qiao, Jie
Sperm origins and concentration do not impact the clinical outcomes in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles
title Sperm origins and concentration do not impact the clinical outcomes in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles
title_full Sperm origins and concentration do not impact the clinical outcomes in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles
title_fullStr Sperm origins and concentration do not impact the clinical outcomes in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles
title_full_unstemmed Sperm origins and concentration do not impact the clinical outcomes in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles
title_short Sperm origins and concentration do not impact the clinical outcomes in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles
title_sort sperm origins and concentration do not impact the clinical outcomes in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6116677/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29798938
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aja.aja_27_18
work_keys_str_mv AT yangcen spermoriginsandconcentrationdonotimpacttheclinicaloutcomesinintracytoplasmicsperminjectioncycles
AT zhouzehong spermoriginsandconcentrationdonotimpacttheclinicaloutcomesinintracytoplasmicsperminjectioncycles
AT zhengdanni spermoriginsandconcentrationdonotimpacttheclinicaloutcomesinintracytoplasmicsperminjectioncycles
AT xuxiaofei spermoriginsandconcentrationdonotimpacttheclinicaloutcomesinintracytoplasmicsperminjectioncycles
AT huangjin spermoriginsandconcentrationdonotimpacttheclinicaloutcomesinintracytoplasmicsperminjectioncycles
AT lianying spermoriginsandconcentrationdonotimpacttheclinicaloutcomesinintracytoplasmicsperminjectioncycles
AT qiaojie spermoriginsandconcentrationdonotimpacttheclinicaloutcomesinintracytoplasmicsperminjectioncycles