Cargando…
Comparison of patient-specific computational models vs. clinical follow-up, for adjacent segment disc degeneration and bone remodelling after spinal fusion
Spinal fusion is a standard surgical treatment for patients suffering from low back pain attributed to disc degeneration. However, results are somewhat variable and unpredictable. With fusion the kinematic behaviour of the spine is altered. Fusion and/or stabilizing implants carrying considerable lo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6116979/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30161138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200899 |
_version_ | 1783351677157376000 |
---|---|
author | van Rijsbergen, Marc van Rietbergen, Bert Barthelemy, Veronique Eltes, Peter Lazáry, Áron Lacroix, Damien Noailly, Jérôme Ho Ba Tho, Marie-Christine Wilson, Wouter Ito, Keita |
author_facet | van Rijsbergen, Marc van Rietbergen, Bert Barthelemy, Veronique Eltes, Peter Lazáry, Áron Lacroix, Damien Noailly, Jérôme Ho Ba Tho, Marie-Christine Wilson, Wouter Ito, Keita |
author_sort | van Rijsbergen, Marc |
collection | PubMed |
description | Spinal fusion is a standard surgical treatment for patients suffering from low back pain attributed to disc degeneration. However, results are somewhat variable and unpredictable. With fusion the kinematic behaviour of the spine is altered. Fusion and/or stabilizing implants carrying considerable load and prevent rotation of the fused segments. Associated with these changes, a risk for accelerated disc degeneration at the adjacent levels to fusion has been demonstrated. However, there is yet no method to predict the effect of fusion surgery on the adjacent tissue levels, i.e. bone and disc. The aim of this study was to develop a coupled and patient-specific mechanoregulated model to predict disc generation and changes in bone density after spinal fusion and to validate the results relative to patient follow-up data. To do so, a multiscale disc mechanoregulation adaptation framework was developed and coupled with a previously developed bone remodelling algorithm. This made it possible to determine extra cellular matrix changes in the intervertebral disc and bone density changes simultaneously based on changes in loading due to fusion surgery. It was shown that for 10 cases the predicted change in bone density and degeneration grade conforms reasonable well to clinical follow-up data. This approach helps us to understand the effect of surgical intervention on the adjacent tissue remodelling. Thereby, providing the first insight for a spine surgeon as to which patient could potentially be treated successfully by spinal fusion and in which patient has a high risk for adjacent tissue changes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6116979 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61169792018-09-16 Comparison of patient-specific computational models vs. clinical follow-up, for adjacent segment disc degeneration and bone remodelling after spinal fusion van Rijsbergen, Marc van Rietbergen, Bert Barthelemy, Veronique Eltes, Peter Lazáry, Áron Lacroix, Damien Noailly, Jérôme Ho Ba Tho, Marie-Christine Wilson, Wouter Ito, Keita PLoS One Research Article Spinal fusion is a standard surgical treatment for patients suffering from low back pain attributed to disc degeneration. However, results are somewhat variable and unpredictable. With fusion the kinematic behaviour of the spine is altered. Fusion and/or stabilizing implants carrying considerable load and prevent rotation of the fused segments. Associated with these changes, a risk for accelerated disc degeneration at the adjacent levels to fusion has been demonstrated. However, there is yet no method to predict the effect of fusion surgery on the adjacent tissue levels, i.e. bone and disc. The aim of this study was to develop a coupled and patient-specific mechanoregulated model to predict disc generation and changes in bone density after spinal fusion and to validate the results relative to patient follow-up data. To do so, a multiscale disc mechanoregulation adaptation framework was developed and coupled with a previously developed bone remodelling algorithm. This made it possible to determine extra cellular matrix changes in the intervertebral disc and bone density changes simultaneously based on changes in loading due to fusion surgery. It was shown that for 10 cases the predicted change in bone density and degeneration grade conforms reasonable well to clinical follow-up data. This approach helps us to understand the effect of surgical intervention on the adjacent tissue remodelling. Thereby, providing the first insight for a spine surgeon as to which patient could potentially be treated successfully by spinal fusion and in which patient has a high risk for adjacent tissue changes. Public Library of Science 2018-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6116979/ /pubmed/30161138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200899 Text en © 2018 Rijsbergen et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article van Rijsbergen, Marc van Rietbergen, Bert Barthelemy, Veronique Eltes, Peter Lazáry, Áron Lacroix, Damien Noailly, Jérôme Ho Ba Tho, Marie-Christine Wilson, Wouter Ito, Keita Comparison of patient-specific computational models vs. clinical follow-up, for adjacent segment disc degeneration and bone remodelling after spinal fusion |
title | Comparison of patient-specific computational models vs. clinical follow-up, for adjacent segment disc degeneration and bone remodelling after spinal fusion |
title_full | Comparison of patient-specific computational models vs. clinical follow-up, for adjacent segment disc degeneration and bone remodelling after spinal fusion |
title_fullStr | Comparison of patient-specific computational models vs. clinical follow-up, for adjacent segment disc degeneration and bone remodelling after spinal fusion |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of patient-specific computational models vs. clinical follow-up, for adjacent segment disc degeneration and bone remodelling after spinal fusion |
title_short | Comparison of patient-specific computational models vs. clinical follow-up, for adjacent segment disc degeneration and bone remodelling after spinal fusion |
title_sort | comparison of patient-specific computational models vs. clinical follow-up, for adjacent segment disc degeneration and bone remodelling after spinal fusion |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6116979/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30161138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200899 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanrijsbergenmarc comparisonofpatientspecificcomputationalmodelsvsclinicalfollowupforadjacentsegmentdiscdegenerationandboneremodellingafterspinalfusion AT vanrietbergenbert comparisonofpatientspecificcomputationalmodelsvsclinicalfollowupforadjacentsegmentdiscdegenerationandboneremodellingafterspinalfusion AT barthelemyveronique comparisonofpatientspecificcomputationalmodelsvsclinicalfollowupforadjacentsegmentdiscdegenerationandboneremodellingafterspinalfusion AT eltespeter comparisonofpatientspecificcomputationalmodelsvsclinicalfollowupforadjacentsegmentdiscdegenerationandboneremodellingafterspinalfusion AT lazaryaron comparisonofpatientspecificcomputationalmodelsvsclinicalfollowupforadjacentsegmentdiscdegenerationandboneremodellingafterspinalfusion AT lacroixdamien comparisonofpatientspecificcomputationalmodelsvsclinicalfollowupforadjacentsegmentdiscdegenerationandboneremodellingafterspinalfusion AT noaillyjerome comparisonofpatientspecificcomputationalmodelsvsclinicalfollowupforadjacentsegmentdiscdegenerationandboneremodellingafterspinalfusion AT hobathomariechristine comparisonofpatientspecificcomputationalmodelsvsclinicalfollowupforadjacentsegmentdiscdegenerationandboneremodellingafterspinalfusion AT wilsonwouter comparisonofpatientspecificcomputationalmodelsvsclinicalfollowupforadjacentsegmentdiscdegenerationandboneremodellingafterspinalfusion AT itokeita comparisonofpatientspecificcomputationalmodelsvsclinicalfollowupforadjacentsegmentdiscdegenerationandboneremodellingafterspinalfusion |