Cargando…

Comparison of patient-specific computational models vs. clinical follow-up, for adjacent segment disc degeneration and bone remodelling after spinal fusion

Spinal fusion is a standard surgical treatment for patients suffering from low back pain attributed to disc degeneration. However, results are somewhat variable and unpredictable. With fusion the kinematic behaviour of the spine is altered. Fusion and/or stabilizing implants carrying considerable lo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Rijsbergen, Marc, van Rietbergen, Bert, Barthelemy, Veronique, Eltes, Peter, Lazáry, Áron, Lacroix, Damien, Noailly, Jérôme, Ho Ba Tho, Marie-Christine, Wilson, Wouter, Ito, Keita
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6116979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30161138
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200899
_version_ 1783351677157376000
author van Rijsbergen, Marc
van Rietbergen, Bert
Barthelemy, Veronique
Eltes, Peter
Lazáry, Áron
Lacroix, Damien
Noailly, Jérôme
Ho Ba Tho, Marie-Christine
Wilson, Wouter
Ito, Keita
author_facet van Rijsbergen, Marc
van Rietbergen, Bert
Barthelemy, Veronique
Eltes, Peter
Lazáry, Áron
Lacroix, Damien
Noailly, Jérôme
Ho Ba Tho, Marie-Christine
Wilson, Wouter
Ito, Keita
author_sort van Rijsbergen, Marc
collection PubMed
description Spinal fusion is a standard surgical treatment for patients suffering from low back pain attributed to disc degeneration. However, results are somewhat variable and unpredictable. With fusion the kinematic behaviour of the spine is altered. Fusion and/or stabilizing implants carrying considerable load and prevent rotation of the fused segments. Associated with these changes, a risk for accelerated disc degeneration at the adjacent levels to fusion has been demonstrated. However, there is yet no method to predict the effect of fusion surgery on the adjacent tissue levels, i.e. bone and disc. The aim of this study was to develop a coupled and patient-specific mechanoregulated model to predict disc generation and changes in bone density after spinal fusion and to validate the results relative to patient follow-up data. To do so, a multiscale disc mechanoregulation adaptation framework was developed and coupled with a previously developed bone remodelling algorithm. This made it possible to determine extra cellular matrix changes in the intervertebral disc and bone density changes simultaneously based on changes in loading due to fusion surgery. It was shown that for 10 cases the predicted change in bone density and degeneration grade conforms reasonable well to clinical follow-up data. This approach helps us to understand the effect of surgical intervention on the adjacent tissue remodelling. Thereby, providing the first insight for a spine surgeon as to which patient could potentially be treated successfully by spinal fusion and in which patient has a high risk for adjacent tissue changes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6116979
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61169792018-09-16 Comparison of patient-specific computational models vs. clinical follow-up, for adjacent segment disc degeneration and bone remodelling after spinal fusion van Rijsbergen, Marc van Rietbergen, Bert Barthelemy, Veronique Eltes, Peter Lazáry, Áron Lacroix, Damien Noailly, Jérôme Ho Ba Tho, Marie-Christine Wilson, Wouter Ito, Keita PLoS One Research Article Spinal fusion is a standard surgical treatment for patients suffering from low back pain attributed to disc degeneration. However, results are somewhat variable and unpredictable. With fusion the kinematic behaviour of the spine is altered. Fusion and/or stabilizing implants carrying considerable load and prevent rotation of the fused segments. Associated with these changes, a risk for accelerated disc degeneration at the adjacent levels to fusion has been demonstrated. However, there is yet no method to predict the effect of fusion surgery on the adjacent tissue levels, i.e. bone and disc. The aim of this study was to develop a coupled and patient-specific mechanoregulated model to predict disc generation and changes in bone density after spinal fusion and to validate the results relative to patient follow-up data. To do so, a multiscale disc mechanoregulation adaptation framework was developed and coupled with a previously developed bone remodelling algorithm. This made it possible to determine extra cellular matrix changes in the intervertebral disc and bone density changes simultaneously based on changes in loading due to fusion surgery. It was shown that for 10 cases the predicted change in bone density and degeneration grade conforms reasonable well to clinical follow-up data. This approach helps us to understand the effect of surgical intervention on the adjacent tissue remodelling. Thereby, providing the first insight for a spine surgeon as to which patient could potentially be treated successfully by spinal fusion and in which patient has a high risk for adjacent tissue changes. Public Library of Science 2018-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6116979/ /pubmed/30161138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200899 Text en © 2018 Rijsbergen et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
van Rijsbergen, Marc
van Rietbergen, Bert
Barthelemy, Veronique
Eltes, Peter
Lazáry, Áron
Lacroix, Damien
Noailly, Jérôme
Ho Ba Tho, Marie-Christine
Wilson, Wouter
Ito, Keita
Comparison of patient-specific computational models vs. clinical follow-up, for adjacent segment disc degeneration and bone remodelling after spinal fusion
title Comparison of patient-specific computational models vs. clinical follow-up, for adjacent segment disc degeneration and bone remodelling after spinal fusion
title_full Comparison of patient-specific computational models vs. clinical follow-up, for adjacent segment disc degeneration and bone remodelling after spinal fusion
title_fullStr Comparison of patient-specific computational models vs. clinical follow-up, for adjacent segment disc degeneration and bone remodelling after spinal fusion
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of patient-specific computational models vs. clinical follow-up, for adjacent segment disc degeneration and bone remodelling after spinal fusion
title_short Comparison of patient-specific computational models vs. clinical follow-up, for adjacent segment disc degeneration and bone remodelling after spinal fusion
title_sort comparison of patient-specific computational models vs. clinical follow-up, for adjacent segment disc degeneration and bone remodelling after spinal fusion
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6116979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30161138
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200899
work_keys_str_mv AT vanrijsbergenmarc comparisonofpatientspecificcomputationalmodelsvsclinicalfollowupforadjacentsegmentdiscdegenerationandboneremodellingafterspinalfusion
AT vanrietbergenbert comparisonofpatientspecificcomputationalmodelsvsclinicalfollowupforadjacentsegmentdiscdegenerationandboneremodellingafterspinalfusion
AT barthelemyveronique comparisonofpatientspecificcomputationalmodelsvsclinicalfollowupforadjacentsegmentdiscdegenerationandboneremodellingafterspinalfusion
AT eltespeter comparisonofpatientspecificcomputationalmodelsvsclinicalfollowupforadjacentsegmentdiscdegenerationandboneremodellingafterspinalfusion
AT lazaryaron comparisonofpatientspecificcomputationalmodelsvsclinicalfollowupforadjacentsegmentdiscdegenerationandboneremodellingafterspinalfusion
AT lacroixdamien comparisonofpatientspecificcomputationalmodelsvsclinicalfollowupforadjacentsegmentdiscdegenerationandboneremodellingafterspinalfusion
AT noaillyjerome comparisonofpatientspecificcomputationalmodelsvsclinicalfollowupforadjacentsegmentdiscdegenerationandboneremodellingafterspinalfusion
AT hobathomariechristine comparisonofpatientspecificcomputationalmodelsvsclinicalfollowupforadjacentsegmentdiscdegenerationandboneremodellingafterspinalfusion
AT wilsonwouter comparisonofpatientspecificcomputationalmodelsvsclinicalfollowupforadjacentsegmentdiscdegenerationandboneremodellingafterspinalfusion
AT itokeita comparisonofpatientspecificcomputationalmodelsvsclinicalfollowupforadjacentsegmentdiscdegenerationandboneremodellingafterspinalfusion