Cargando…
A 3D two-point method for whole-brain water content and relaxation time mapping: Comparison with gold standard methods
Quantitative imaging of the human brain is of great interest in clinical research as it enables the identification of a range of MR biomarkers useful in diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of a wide spectrum of diseases. Here, a 3D two-point method for water content and relaxation time mapping is pre...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6116981/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30161125 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201013 |
Sumario: | Quantitative imaging of the human brain is of great interest in clinical research as it enables the identification of a range of MR biomarkers useful in diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of a wide spectrum of diseases. Here, a 3D two-point method for water content and relaxation time mapping is presented and compared to established gold standard methods. The method determines free water content, H(2)O, and the longitudinal relaxation time, T(1), quantitatively from a two-point fit to the signal equation including corrections of the transmit and receive fields. In addition, the effective transverse relaxation time, T(2)*, is obtained from an exponential fit to the multi-echo signal train and its influence on H(2)O values is corrected. The phantom results obtained with the proposed method show good agreement for H(2)O and T(1) values with known and spectroscopically measured values, respectively. The method is compared in vivo to already established gold standard quantitative methods. For H(2)O and T(2)* mapping, the 3D two-point results were compared to a measurement conducted with a multiple-echo GRE with long TR and T(1) is compared to results from a Look-Locker method, TAPIR. In vivo results show good overall agreement between the methods, but some systematic deviations are present. Besides an expected dependence of T(2)* on voxel size, T(1) values are systematically larger in the 3D approach than those obtained with the gold standard method. This behaviour might be due to imperfect spoiling, influencing each method differently. Results for H(2)O differ due to differences in the saturation of cerebrospinal fluid and partial volume effects. In addition, ground truth values of in vivo studies are unknown, even when comparing to in vivo gold standard methods. A detailed region-of-interest analysis for H(2)O and T(1) matches well published literature values. |
---|