Cargando…

How are genetic test results being used by Australian life insurers?

In Australia, the USA and many Asian countries the life insurance industry is self-regulated. Individuals must disclose genetic test results known to them in applications for new or updated policies including cover for critical care, income protection and death. There is limited information regardin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barlow-Stewart, K., Liepins, M., Doble, A., Otlowski, M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6117272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29891881
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41431-018-0198-z
_version_ 1783351724807815168
author Barlow-Stewart, K.
Liepins, M.
Doble, A.
Otlowski, M.
author_facet Barlow-Stewart, K.
Liepins, M.
Doble, A.
Otlowski, M.
author_sort Barlow-Stewart, K.
collection PubMed
description In Australia, the USA and many Asian countries the life insurance industry is self-regulated. Individuals must disclose genetic test results known to them in applications for new or updated policies including cover for critical care, income protection and death. There is limited information regarding how underwriting decisions are made for policies with such disclosures. The Australian Financial Services Council (FSC) provided de-identified data collected on applications with genetic test result disclosure from its life insurance member companies 2010–2013 to enable repetition of an independent examination undertaken of applications 1999-2003: age; gender; genetic condition; testing result; decision-maker; and insurance cover. Data was classified as to test result alone or additional other factors relevant to risk and decision. Where necessary, the FSC facilitated clarification by insurers. 345/548 applications related to adult-onset conditions. The genetic test result solely influenced the decision in 165/345 applications: positive (n = 23), negative (n = 139) and pending (n = 3). Detailed analyses of the decisions in each of these result categories are presented with specific details of 11 test cases. Policies with standard decisions were provided for all negative test results with evidence of reassessment of previous non-standard decisions and 20/23 positive results with recognition of risk reduction strategies. Disclosure of positive results for breast/ovarian cancer, Lynch syndrome and hereditary spastic paraplegia, and three pending results, generated non-standard decisions. The examination demonstrates some progress in addressing concerns in regard to utilisation of genetic test information but the self-regulatory system in Australia only goes some way in meeting internationally recommended best practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6117272
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61172722018-08-31 How are genetic test results being used by Australian life insurers? Barlow-Stewart, K. Liepins, M. Doble, A. Otlowski, M. Eur J Hum Genet Article In Australia, the USA and many Asian countries the life insurance industry is self-regulated. Individuals must disclose genetic test results known to them in applications for new or updated policies including cover for critical care, income protection and death. There is limited information regarding how underwriting decisions are made for policies with such disclosures. The Australian Financial Services Council (FSC) provided de-identified data collected on applications with genetic test result disclosure from its life insurance member companies 2010–2013 to enable repetition of an independent examination undertaken of applications 1999-2003: age; gender; genetic condition; testing result; decision-maker; and insurance cover. Data was classified as to test result alone or additional other factors relevant to risk and decision. Where necessary, the FSC facilitated clarification by insurers. 345/548 applications related to adult-onset conditions. The genetic test result solely influenced the decision in 165/345 applications: positive (n = 23), negative (n = 139) and pending (n = 3). Detailed analyses of the decisions in each of these result categories are presented with specific details of 11 test cases. Policies with standard decisions were provided for all negative test results with evidence of reassessment of previous non-standard decisions and 20/23 positive results with recognition of risk reduction strategies. Disclosure of positive results for breast/ovarian cancer, Lynch syndrome and hereditary spastic paraplegia, and three pending results, generated non-standard decisions. The examination demonstrates some progress in addressing concerns in regard to utilisation of genetic test information but the self-regulatory system in Australia only goes some way in meeting internationally recommended best practice. Springer International Publishing 2018-06-11 2018-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6117272/ /pubmed/29891881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41431-018-0198-z Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Barlow-Stewart, K.
Liepins, M.
Doble, A.
Otlowski, M.
How are genetic test results being used by Australian life insurers?
title How are genetic test results being used by Australian life insurers?
title_full How are genetic test results being used by Australian life insurers?
title_fullStr How are genetic test results being used by Australian life insurers?
title_full_unstemmed How are genetic test results being used by Australian life insurers?
title_short How are genetic test results being used by Australian life insurers?
title_sort how are genetic test results being used by australian life insurers?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6117272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29891881
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41431-018-0198-z
work_keys_str_mv AT barlowstewartk howaregenetictestresultsbeingusedbyaustralianlifeinsurers
AT liepinsm howaregenetictestresultsbeingusedbyaustralianlifeinsurers
AT doblea howaregenetictestresultsbeingusedbyaustralianlifeinsurers
AT otlowskim howaregenetictestresultsbeingusedbyaustralianlifeinsurers