Cargando…

The contribution of a negative colorectal screening test result to symptom appraisal and help‐seeking behaviour among patients subsequently diagnosed with an interval colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programmes using a guaiac faecal occult blood test (gFOBt) reduce CRC mortality. Interval cancers are diagnosed between screening rounds: reassurance from a negative gFOBt has the potential to influence the pathway to diagnosis of an interval colorectal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barnett, Karen N, Weller, David, Smith, Steve, Steele, Robert JC, Vedsted, Peter, Orbell, Sheina, Moss, Sue M, Melia, Jane W, Patnick, Julietta, Campbell, Christine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6117494/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29457677
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.12672
_version_ 1783351771153825792
author Barnett, Karen N
Weller, David
Smith, Steve
Steele, Robert JC
Vedsted, Peter
Orbell, Sheina
Moss, Sue M
Melia, Jane W
Patnick, Julietta
Campbell, Christine
author_facet Barnett, Karen N
Weller, David
Smith, Steve
Steele, Robert JC
Vedsted, Peter
Orbell, Sheina
Moss, Sue M
Melia, Jane W
Patnick, Julietta
Campbell, Christine
author_sort Barnett, Karen N
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programmes using a guaiac faecal occult blood test (gFOBt) reduce CRC mortality. Interval cancers are diagnosed between screening rounds: reassurance from a negative gFOBt has the potential to influence the pathway to diagnosis of an interval colorectal cancer. METHODS: Twenty‐six semi‐structured face‐to‐face interviews were carried out in Scotland and England, with individuals diagnosed with an interval colorectal cancer following a negative gFOBt result. RESULTS: Participants reported they were reassured by a negative gFOBt, interpreting their result as an “all clear”. Therefore, most did not suspect cancer as a possible cause of symptoms and many did not recall their screening result during symptom appraisal. Among those who did consider cancer, and did think about their screening test result, reassurance from a negative gFOBt led some to “downplay” the seriousness of their symptoms with some interviewees explicitly stating that their negative test result contributed to a delayed decision to seek help. CONCLUSION: Screening participants need to be informed of the limitations of screening and the ongoing risk of developing colorectal cancer even when in receipt of a negative result: the importance of minimizing delay in seeking medical advice for colorectal symptoms should be emphasized.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6117494
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61174942018-09-05 The contribution of a negative colorectal screening test result to symptom appraisal and help‐seeking behaviour among patients subsequently diagnosed with an interval colorectal cancer Barnett, Karen N Weller, David Smith, Steve Steele, Robert JC Vedsted, Peter Orbell, Sheina Moss, Sue M Melia, Jane W Patnick, Julietta Campbell, Christine Health Expect Original Research Papers BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programmes using a guaiac faecal occult blood test (gFOBt) reduce CRC mortality. Interval cancers are diagnosed between screening rounds: reassurance from a negative gFOBt has the potential to influence the pathway to diagnosis of an interval colorectal cancer. METHODS: Twenty‐six semi‐structured face‐to‐face interviews were carried out in Scotland and England, with individuals diagnosed with an interval colorectal cancer following a negative gFOBt result. RESULTS: Participants reported they were reassured by a negative gFOBt, interpreting their result as an “all clear”. Therefore, most did not suspect cancer as a possible cause of symptoms and many did not recall their screening result during symptom appraisal. Among those who did consider cancer, and did think about their screening test result, reassurance from a negative gFOBt led some to “downplay” the seriousness of their symptoms with some interviewees explicitly stating that their negative test result contributed to a delayed decision to seek help. CONCLUSION: Screening participants need to be informed of the limitations of screening and the ongoing risk of developing colorectal cancer even when in receipt of a negative result: the importance of minimizing delay in seeking medical advice for colorectal symptoms should be emphasized. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-02-19 2018-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6117494/ /pubmed/29457677 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.12672 Text en © 2018 The Authors Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research Papers
Barnett, Karen N
Weller, David
Smith, Steve
Steele, Robert JC
Vedsted, Peter
Orbell, Sheina
Moss, Sue M
Melia, Jane W
Patnick, Julietta
Campbell, Christine
The contribution of a negative colorectal screening test result to symptom appraisal and help‐seeking behaviour among patients subsequently diagnosed with an interval colorectal cancer
title The contribution of a negative colorectal screening test result to symptom appraisal and help‐seeking behaviour among patients subsequently diagnosed with an interval colorectal cancer
title_full The contribution of a negative colorectal screening test result to symptom appraisal and help‐seeking behaviour among patients subsequently diagnosed with an interval colorectal cancer
title_fullStr The contribution of a negative colorectal screening test result to symptom appraisal and help‐seeking behaviour among patients subsequently diagnosed with an interval colorectal cancer
title_full_unstemmed The contribution of a negative colorectal screening test result to symptom appraisal and help‐seeking behaviour among patients subsequently diagnosed with an interval colorectal cancer
title_short The contribution of a negative colorectal screening test result to symptom appraisal and help‐seeking behaviour among patients subsequently diagnosed with an interval colorectal cancer
title_sort contribution of a negative colorectal screening test result to symptom appraisal and help‐seeking behaviour among patients subsequently diagnosed with an interval colorectal cancer
topic Original Research Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6117494/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29457677
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.12672
work_keys_str_mv AT barnettkarenn thecontributionofanegativecolorectalscreeningtestresulttosymptomappraisalandhelpseekingbehaviouramongpatientssubsequentlydiagnosedwithanintervalcolorectalcancer
AT wellerdavid thecontributionofanegativecolorectalscreeningtestresulttosymptomappraisalandhelpseekingbehaviouramongpatientssubsequentlydiagnosedwithanintervalcolorectalcancer
AT smithsteve thecontributionofanegativecolorectalscreeningtestresulttosymptomappraisalandhelpseekingbehaviouramongpatientssubsequentlydiagnosedwithanintervalcolorectalcancer
AT steelerobertjc thecontributionofanegativecolorectalscreeningtestresulttosymptomappraisalandhelpseekingbehaviouramongpatientssubsequentlydiagnosedwithanintervalcolorectalcancer
AT vedstedpeter thecontributionofanegativecolorectalscreeningtestresulttosymptomappraisalandhelpseekingbehaviouramongpatientssubsequentlydiagnosedwithanintervalcolorectalcancer
AT orbellsheina thecontributionofanegativecolorectalscreeningtestresulttosymptomappraisalandhelpseekingbehaviouramongpatientssubsequentlydiagnosedwithanintervalcolorectalcancer
AT mosssuem thecontributionofanegativecolorectalscreeningtestresulttosymptomappraisalandhelpseekingbehaviouramongpatientssubsequentlydiagnosedwithanintervalcolorectalcancer
AT meliajanew thecontributionofanegativecolorectalscreeningtestresulttosymptomappraisalandhelpseekingbehaviouramongpatientssubsequentlydiagnosedwithanintervalcolorectalcancer
AT patnickjulietta thecontributionofanegativecolorectalscreeningtestresulttosymptomappraisalandhelpseekingbehaviouramongpatientssubsequentlydiagnosedwithanintervalcolorectalcancer
AT campbellchristine thecontributionofanegativecolorectalscreeningtestresulttosymptomappraisalandhelpseekingbehaviouramongpatientssubsequentlydiagnosedwithanintervalcolorectalcancer
AT barnettkarenn contributionofanegativecolorectalscreeningtestresulttosymptomappraisalandhelpseekingbehaviouramongpatientssubsequentlydiagnosedwithanintervalcolorectalcancer
AT wellerdavid contributionofanegativecolorectalscreeningtestresulttosymptomappraisalandhelpseekingbehaviouramongpatientssubsequentlydiagnosedwithanintervalcolorectalcancer
AT smithsteve contributionofanegativecolorectalscreeningtestresulttosymptomappraisalandhelpseekingbehaviouramongpatientssubsequentlydiagnosedwithanintervalcolorectalcancer
AT steelerobertjc contributionofanegativecolorectalscreeningtestresulttosymptomappraisalandhelpseekingbehaviouramongpatientssubsequentlydiagnosedwithanintervalcolorectalcancer
AT vedstedpeter contributionofanegativecolorectalscreeningtestresulttosymptomappraisalandhelpseekingbehaviouramongpatientssubsequentlydiagnosedwithanintervalcolorectalcancer
AT orbellsheina contributionofanegativecolorectalscreeningtestresulttosymptomappraisalandhelpseekingbehaviouramongpatientssubsequentlydiagnosedwithanintervalcolorectalcancer
AT mosssuem contributionofanegativecolorectalscreeningtestresulttosymptomappraisalandhelpseekingbehaviouramongpatientssubsequentlydiagnosedwithanintervalcolorectalcancer
AT meliajanew contributionofanegativecolorectalscreeningtestresulttosymptomappraisalandhelpseekingbehaviouramongpatientssubsequentlydiagnosedwithanintervalcolorectalcancer
AT patnickjulietta contributionofanegativecolorectalscreeningtestresulttosymptomappraisalandhelpseekingbehaviouramongpatientssubsequentlydiagnosedwithanintervalcolorectalcancer
AT campbellchristine contributionofanegativecolorectalscreeningtestresulttosymptomappraisalandhelpseekingbehaviouramongpatientssubsequentlydiagnosedwithanintervalcolorectalcancer