Cargando…

Left ventricular blood flow kinetic energy after myocardial infarction - insights from 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance

BACKGROUND: Myocardial infarction (MI) leads to complex changes in left ventricular (LV) haemodynamics that are linked to clinical outcomes. We hypothesize that LV blood flow kinetic energy (KE) is altered in MI and is associated with LV function and infarct characteristics. This study aimed to inve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garg, Pankaj, Crandon, Saul, Swoboda, Peter P., Fent, Graham J., Foley, James R. J., Chew, Pei G., Brown, Louise A. E., Vijayan, Sethumadhavan, Hassell, Mariëlla E. C. J., Nijveldt, Robin, Bissell, Malenka, Elbaz, Mohammed S. M., Al-Mohammad, Abdallah, Westenberg, Jos J. M., Greenwood, John P., van der Geest, Rob J., Plein, Sven, Dall’Armellina, Erica
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6117925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30165869
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-018-0483-6
_version_ 1783351839799902208
author Garg, Pankaj
Crandon, Saul
Swoboda, Peter P.
Fent, Graham J.
Foley, James R. J.
Chew, Pei G.
Brown, Louise A. E.
Vijayan, Sethumadhavan
Hassell, Mariëlla E. C. J.
Nijveldt, Robin
Bissell, Malenka
Elbaz, Mohammed S. M.
Al-Mohammad, Abdallah
Westenberg, Jos J. M.
Greenwood, John P.
van der Geest, Rob J.
Plein, Sven
Dall’Armellina, Erica
author_facet Garg, Pankaj
Crandon, Saul
Swoboda, Peter P.
Fent, Graham J.
Foley, James R. J.
Chew, Pei G.
Brown, Louise A. E.
Vijayan, Sethumadhavan
Hassell, Mariëlla E. C. J.
Nijveldt, Robin
Bissell, Malenka
Elbaz, Mohammed S. M.
Al-Mohammad, Abdallah
Westenberg, Jos J. M.
Greenwood, John P.
van der Geest, Rob J.
Plein, Sven
Dall’Armellina, Erica
author_sort Garg, Pankaj
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Myocardial infarction (MI) leads to complex changes in left ventricular (LV) haemodynamics that are linked to clinical outcomes. We hypothesize that LV blood flow kinetic energy (KE) is altered in MI and is associated with LV function and infarct characteristics. This study aimed to investigate the intra-cavity LV blood flow KE in controls and MI patients, using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) four-dimensional (4D) flow assessment. METHODS: Forty-eight patients with MI (acute-22; chronic-26) and 20 age/gender-matched healthy controls underwent CMR which included cines and whole-heart 4D flow. Patients also received late gadolinium enhancement imaging for infarct assessment. LV blood flow KE parameters were indexed to LV end-diastolic volume and include: averaged LV, minimal, systolic, diastolic, peak E-wave and peak A-wave KEi(EDV). In addition, we investigated the in-plane proportion of LV KE (%) and the time difference (TD) to peak E-wave KE propagation from base to mid-ventricle was computed. Association of LV blood flow KE parameters to LV function and infarct size were investigated in all groups. RESULTS: LV KEi(EDV) was higher in controls than in MI patients (8.5 ± 3 μJ/ml versus 6.5 ± 3 μJ/ml, P = 0.02). Additionally, systolic, minimal and diastolic peak E-wave KEi(EDV) were lower in MI (P < 0.05). In logistic-regression analysis, systolic KEi(EDV) (Beta = − 0.24, P < 0.01) demonstrated the strongest association with the presence of MI. In multiple-regression analysis, infarct size was most strongly associated with in-plane KE (r = 0.5, Beta = 1.1, P < 0.01). In patients with preserved LV ejection fraction (EF), minimal and in-plane KEi(EDV) were reduced (P < 0.05) and time difference to peak E-wave KE propagation during diastole increased (P < 0.05) when compared to controls with normal EF. CONCLUSIONS: Reduction in LV systolic function results in reduction in systolic flow KEi(EDV). Infarct size is independently associated with the proportion of in-plane LV KE. Degree of LV impairment is associated with TD of peak E-wave KE. In patient with preserved EF post MI, LV blood flow KE mapping demonstrated significant changes in the in-plane KE, the minimal KEi(EDV) and the TD. These three blood flow KE parameters may offer novel methods to identify and describe this patient population. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12968-018-0483-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6117925
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61179252018-09-05 Left ventricular blood flow kinetic energy after myocardial infarction - insights from 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance Garg, Pankaj Crandon, Saul Swoboda, Peter P. Fent, Graham J. Foley, James R. J. Chew, Pei G. Brown, Louise A. E. Vijayan, Sethumadhavan Hassell, Mariëlla E. C. J. Nijveldt, Robin Bissell, Malenka Elbaz, Mohammed S. M. Al-Mohammad, Abdallah Westenberg, Jos J. M. Greenwood, John P. van der Geest, Rob J. Plein, Sven Dall’Armellina, Erica J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Research BACKGROUND: Myocardial infarction (MI) leads to complex changes in left ventricular (LV) haemodynamics that are linked to clinical outcomes. We hypothesize that LV blood flow kinetic energy (KE) is altered in MI and is associated with LV function and infarct characteristics. This study aimed to investigate the intra-cavity LV blood flow KE in controls and MI patients, using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) four-dimensional (4D) flow assessment. METHODS: Forty-eight patients with MI (acute-22; chronic-26) and 20 age/gender-matched healthy controls underwent CMR which included cines and whole-heart 4D flow. Patients also received late gadolinium enhancement imaging for infarct assessment. LV blood flow KE parameters were indexed to LV end-diastolic volume and include: averaged LV, minimal, systolic, diastolic, peak E-wave and peak A-wave KEi(EDV). In addition, we investigated the in-plane proportion of LV KE (%) and the time difference (TD) to peak E-wave KE propagation from base to mid-ventricle was computed. Association of LV blood flow KE parameters to LV function and infarct size were investigated in all groups. RESULTS: LV KEi(EDV) was higher in controls than in MI patients (8.5 ± 3 μJ/ml versus 6.5 ± 3 μJ/ml, P = 0.02). Additionally, systolic, minimal and diastolic peak E-wave KEi(EDV) were lower in MI (P < 0.05). In logistic-regression analysis, systolic KEi(EDV) (Beta = − 0.24, P < 0.01) demonstrated the strongest association with the presence of MI. In multiple-regression analysis, infarct size was most strongly associated with in-plane KE (r = 0.5, Beta = 1.1, P < 0.01). In patients with preserved LV ejection fraction (EF), minimal and in-plane KEi(EDV) were reduced (P < 0.05) and time difference to peak E-wave KE propagation during diastole increased (P < 0.05) when compared to controls with normal EF. CONCLUSIONS: Reduction in LV systolic function results in reduction in systolic flow KEi(EDV). Infarct size is independently associated with the proportion of in-plane LV KE. Degree of LV impairment is associated with TD of peak E-wave KE. In patient with preserved EF post MI, LV blood flow KE mapping demonstrated significant changes in the in-plane KE, the minimal KEi(EDV) and the TD. These three blood flow KE parameters may offer novel methods to identify and describe this patient population. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12968-018-0483-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6117925/ /pubmed/30165869 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-018-0483-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Garg, Pankaj
Crandon, Saul
Swoboda, Peter P.
Fent, Graham J.
Foley, James R. J.
Chew, Pei G.
Brown, Louise A. E.
Vijayan, Sethumadhavan
Hassell, Mariëlla E. C. J.
Nijveldt, Robin
Bissell, Malenka
Elbaz, Mohammed S. M.
Al-Mohammad, Abdallah
Westenberg, Jos J. M.
Greenwood, John P.
van der Geest, Rob J.
Plein, Sven
Dall’Armellina, Erica
Left ventricular blood flow kinetic energy after myocardial infarction - insights from 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance
title Left ventricular blood flow kinetic energy after myocardial infarction - insights from 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance
title_full Left ventricular blood flow kinetic energy after myocardial infarction - insights from 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance
title_fullStr Left ventricular blood flow kinetic energy after myocardial infarction - insights from 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance
title_full_unstemmed Left ventricular blood flow kinetic energy after myocardial infarction - insights from 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance
title_short Left ventricular blood flow kinetic energy after myocardial infarction - insights from 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance
title_sort left ventricular blood flow kinetic energy after myocardial infarction - insights from 4d flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6117925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30165869
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-018-0483-6
work_keys_str_mv AT gargpankaj leftventricularbloodflowkineticenergyaftermyocardialinfarctioninsightsfrom4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT crandonsaul leftventricularbloodflowkineticenergyaftermyocardialinfarctioninsightsfrom4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT swobodapeterp leftventricularbloodflowkineticenergyaftermyocardialinfarctioninsightsfrom4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT fentgrahamj leftventricularbloodflowkineticenergyaftermyocardialinfarctioninsightsfrom4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT foleyjamesrj leftventricularbloodflowkineticenergyaftermyocardialinfarctioninsightsfrom4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT chewpeig leftventricularbloodflowkineticenergyaftermyocardialinfarctioninsightsfrom4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT brownlouiseae leftventricularbloodflowkineticenergyaftermyocardialinfarctioninsightsfrom4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT vijayansethumadhavan leftventricularbloodflowkineticenergyaftermyocardialinfarctioninsightsfrom4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT hassellmariellaecj leftventricularbloodflowkineticenergyaftermyocardialinfarctioninsightsfrom4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT nijveldtrobin leftventricularbloodflowkineticenergyaftermyocardialinfarctioninsightsfrom4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT bissellmalenka leftventricularbloodflowkineticenergyaftermyocardialinfarctioninsightsfrom4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT elbazmohammedsm leftventricularbloodflowkineticenergyaftermyocardialinfarctioninsightsfrom4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT almohammadabdallah leftventricularbloodflowkineticenergyaftermyocardialinfarctioninsightsfrom4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT westenbergjosjm leftventricularbloodflowkineticenergyaftermyocardialinfarctioninsightsfrom4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT greenwoodjohnp leftventricularbloodflowkineticenergyaftermyocardialinfarctioninsightsfrom4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT vandergeestrobj leftventricularbloodflowkineticenergyaftermyocardialinfarctioninsightsfrom4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT pleinsven leftventricularbloodflowkineticenergyaftermyocardialinfarctioninsightsfrom4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonance
AT dallarmellinaerica leftventricularbloodflowkineticenergyaftermyocardialinfarctioninsightsfrom4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonance