Cargando…

Comparing the costs and outcomes of an integrated twin compression screw (ITCS) nail with standard of care using a single lag screw or a single helical blade cephalomedullary nail in patients with intertrochanteric hip fractures

BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment is the optimal strategy for managing intertrochanteric fractures as it allows for early rehabilitation and functional recovery. The purpose of the study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of commonly used cephalomedullary nails for the treatment of unstable intertroc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nherera, Leo M., Trueman, Paul, Horner, Alan, Johnstone, Alan J., Watson, Tracy J., Fatoye, Francis A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6117956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30165881
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0923-x
_version_ 1783351847066533888
author Nherera, Leo M.
Trueman, Paul
Horner, Alan
Johnstone, Alan J.
Watson, Tracy J.
Fatoye, Francis A.
author_facet Nherera, Leo M.
Trueman, Paul
Horner, Alan
Johnstone, Alan J.
Watson, Tracy J.
Fatoye, Francis A.
author_sort Nherera, Leo M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment is the optimal strategy for managing intertrochanteric fractures as it allows for early rehabilitation and functional recovery. The purpose of the study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of commonly used cephalomedullary nails for the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures. METHODS: A decision analytic model was developed from a US payer’s perspective using clinical data from a pairwise meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and comparative observational studies comparing the integrated twin compression screw (ITCS) nail versus two single-screw or blade cephalomedullary nails [single lag screw (SLS) nail and single helical blade (SHB) nail]. The model considered a cohort of 1000 patients with a mean age of 76, as reported in the clinical studies over a 1-year time period. Cost data was obtained from the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services website and published literature and adjusted for inflation. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the effect of uncertainty in model parameters on model conclusions. RESULTS: The model estimated 0.546 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and 0.78 complications avoided by using the ITCS nail and 0.455 QALYs and 0.67 complications avoided for the standard of care, using SLS or SHB nails. The cost per patient was $34,336 for patients treated with an ITCS nail and $37,036 for patients treated with the standard of care respectively, resulting in a cost saving of $2700 in favour of the ITCS nail. More savings were observed when the ITCS nail was compared to the SHB ($3280 per patient) and SLS ($1652 per patient). The findings were robust to a range of both one-way and the probabilistic sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the ITCS nail can be considered a cost saving intervention in patients undergoing intertrochanteric fracture fixation with an intramedullary device. Clinicians and policy makers should be encouraged to adopt healthcare technologies such as ITCS that will help them to provide quality healthcare despite falling budgets.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6117956
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61179562018-09-05 Comparing the costs and outcomes of an integrated twin compression screw (ITCS) nail with standard of care using a single lag screw or a single helical blade cephalomedullary nail in patients with intertrochanteric hip fractures Nherera, Leo M. Trueman, Paul Horner, Alan Johnstone, Alan J. Watson, Tracy J. Fatoye, Francis A. J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment is the optimal strategy for managing intertrochanteric fractures as it allows for early rehabilitation and functional recovery. The purpose of the study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of commonly used cephalomedullary nails for the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures. METHODS: A decision analytic model was developed from a US payer’s perspective using clinical data from a pairwise meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and comparative observational studies comparing the integrated twin compression screw (ITCS) nail versus two single-screw or blade cephalomedullary nails [single lag screw (SLS) nail and single helical blade (SHB) nail]. The model considered a cohort of 1000 patients with a mean age of 76, as reported in the clinical studies over a 1-year time period. Cost data was obtained from the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services website and published literature and adjusted for inflation. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the effect of uncertainty in model parameters on model conclusions. RESULTS: The model estimated 0.546 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and 0.78 complications avoided by using the ITCS nail and 0.455 QALYs and 0.67 complications avoided for the standard of care, using SLS or SHB nails. The cost per patient was $34,336 for patients treated with an ITCS nail and $37,036 for patients treated with the standard of care respectively, resulting in a cost saving of $2700 in favour of the ITCS nail. More savings were observed when the ITCS nail was compared to the SHB ($3280 per patient) and SLS ($1652 per patient). The findings were robust to a range of both one-way and the probabilistic sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the ITCS nail can be considered a cost saving intervention in patients undergoing intertrochanteric fracture fixation with an intramedullary device. Clinicians and policy makers should be encouraged to adopt healthcare technologies such as ITCS that will help them to provide quality healthcare despite falling budgets. BioMed Central 2018-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6117956/ /pubmed/30165881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0923-x Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nherera, Leo M.
Trueman, Paul
Horner, Alan
Johnstone, Alan J.
Watson, Tracy J.
Fatoye, Francis A.
Comparing the costs and outcomes of an integrated twin compression screw (ITCS) nail with standard of care using a single lag screw or a single helical blade cephalomedullary nail in patients with intertrochanteric hip fractures
title Comparing the costs and outcomes of an integrated twin compression screw (ITCS) nail with standard of care using a single lag screw or a single helical blade cephalomedullary nail in patients with intertrochanteric hip fractures
title_full Comparing the costs and outcomes of an integrated twin compression screw (ITCS) nail with standard of care using a single lag screw or a single helical blade cephalomedullary nail in patients with intertrochanteric hip fractures
title_fullStr Comparing the costs and outcomes of an integrated twin compression screw (ITCS) nail with standard of care using a single lag screw or a single helical blade cephalomedullary nail in patients with intertrochanteric hip fractures
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the costs and outcomes of an integrated twin compression screw (ITCS) nail with standard of care using a single lag screw or a single helical blade cephalomedullary nail in patients with intertrochanteric hip fractures
title_short Comparing the costs and outcomes of an integrated twin compression screw (ITCS) nail with standard of care using a single lag screw or a single helical blade cephalomedullary nail in patients with intertrochanteric hip fractures
title_sort comparing the costs and outcomes of an integrated twin compression screw (itcs) nail with standard of care using a single lag screw or a single helical blade cephalomedullary nail in patients with intertrochanteric hip fractures
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6117956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30165881
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0923-x
work_keys_str_mv AT nhereraleom comparingthecostsandoutcomesofanintegratedtwincompressionscrewitcsnailwithstandardofcareusingasinglelagscreworasinglehelicalbladecephalomedullarynailinpatientswithintertrochanterichipfractures
AT truemanpaul comparingthecostsandoutcomesofanintegratedtwincompressionscrewitcsnailwithstandardofcareusingasinglelagscreworasinglehelicalbladecephalomedullarynailinpatientswithintertrochanterichipfractures
AT horneralan comparingthecostsandoutcomesofanintegratedtwincompressionscrewitcsnailwithstandardofcareusingasinglelagscreworasinglehelicalbladecephalomedullarynailinpatientswithintertrochanterichipfractures
AT johnstonealanj comparingthecostsandoutcomesofanintegratedtwincompressionscrewitcsnailwithstandardofcareusingasinglelagscreworasinglehelicalbladecephalomedullarynailinpatientswithintertrochanterichipfractures
AT watsontracyj comparingthecostsandoutcomesofanintegratedtwincompressionscrewitcsnailwithstandardofcareusingasinglelagscreworasinglehelicalbladecephalomedullarynailinpatientswithintertrochanterichipfractures
AT fatoyefrancisa comparingthecostsandoutcomesofanintegratedtwincompressionscrewitcsnailwithstandardofcareusingasinglelagscreworasinglehelicalbladecephalomedullarynailinpatientswithintertrochanterichipfractures