Cargando…

Adoption of Stroke Rehabilitation Technologies by the User Community: Qualitative Study

BACKGROUND: Using technology in stroke rehabilitation is attractive. Devices such as robots or smartphones can help deliver evidence-based levels of practice intensity and automated feedback without additional labor costs. Currently, however, few technologies have been adopted into everyday rehabili...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kerr, Andrew, Smith, Mark, Reid, Lynn, Baillie, Lynne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6119213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30120086
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/rehab.9219
_version_ 1783352044063555584
author Kerr, Andrew
Smith, Mark
Reid, Lynn
Baillie, Lynne
author_facet Kerr, Andrew
Smith, Mark
Reid, Lynn
Baillie, Lynne
author_sort Kerr, Andrew
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Using technology in stroke rehabilitation is attractive. Devices such as robots or smartphones can help deliver evidence-based levels of practice intensity and automated feedback without additional labor costs. Currently, however, few technologies have been adopted into everyday rehabilitation. OBJECTIVE: This project aimed to identify stakeholder (therapists, patients, and caregivers) priorities for stroke rehabilitation technologies and to generate user-centered solutions for enhancing everyday adoption. METHODS: We invited stakeholders (n=60), comprising stroke survivors (20/60, 33%), therapists (20/60, 33%), caregivers, and technology developers (including researchers; 20/60, 33%), to attend 2 facilitated workshops. Workshop 1 was preceded by a national survey of stroke survivors and therapists (n=177) to generate an initial list of priorities. The subsequent workshop focused on identifying practical solutions to enhance adoption. RESULTS: A total of 25 priorities were generated from the survey; these were reduced to 10 nonranked priorities through discussion, consensus activities, and voting at Workshop 1: access to technologies, ease of use, awareness of available technologies, technologies focused on function, supports self-management, user training, evidence of effectiveness, value for money, knowledgeable staff, and performance feedback. The second workshop provided recommendations for improving the adoption of technologies in stroke rehabilitation: an annual exhibition of commercially available and developing technologies, an online consumer-rating website of available technologies, and a user network to inspire and test new technologies. CONCLUSIONS: The key outcomes from this series of stakeholder workshops provides a starting point for an integrated approach to promoting greater adoption of technologies in stroke rehabilitation. Bringing technology developers and users together to shape future and evaluate current technologies is critical to achieving evidence-based stroke rehabilitation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6119213
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61192132018-09-06 Adoption of Stroke Rehabilitation Technologies by the User Community: Qualitative Study Kerr, Andrew Smith, Mark Reid, Lynn Baillie, Lynne JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol Original Paper BACKGROUND: Using technology in stroke rehabilitation is attractive. Devices such as robots or smartphones can help deliver evidence-based levels of practice intensity and automated feedback without additional labor costs. Currently, however, few technologies have been adopted into everyday rehabilitation. OBJECTIVE: This project aimed to identify stakeholder (therapists, patients, and caregivers) priorities for stroke rehabilitation technologies and to generate user-centered solutions for enhancing everyday adoption. METHODS: We invited stakeholders (n=60), comprising stroke survivors (20/60, 33%), therapists (20/60, 33%), caregivers, and technology developers (including researchers; 20/60, 33%), to attend 2 facilitated workshops. Workshop 1 was preceded by a national survey of stroke survivors and therapists (n=177) to generate an initial list of priorities. The subsequent workshop focused on identifying practical solutions to enhance adoption. RESULTS: A total of 25 priorities were generated from the survey; these were reduced to 10 nonranked priorities through discussion, consensus activities, and voting at Workshop 1: access to technologies, ease of use, awareness of available technologies, technologies focused on function, supports self-management, user training, evidence of effectiveness, value for money, knowledgeable staff, and performance feedback. The second workshop provided recommendations for improving the adoption of technologies in stroke rehabilitation: an annual exhibition of commercially available and developing technologies, an online consumer-rating website of available technologies, and a user network to inspire and test new technologies. CONCLUSIONS: The key outcomes from this series of stakeholder workshops provides a starting point for an integrated approach to promoting greater adoption of technologies in stroke rehabilitation. Bringing technology developers and users together to shape future and evaluate current technologies is critical to achieving evidence-based stroke rehabilitation. JMIR Publications 2018-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC6119213/ /pubmed/30120086 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/rehab.9219 Text en ©Andrew Kerr, Mark Smith, Lynn Reid, Lynne Baillie. Originally published in JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technology (http://rehab.jmir.org), 17.08.2018. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technology, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://rehab.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Kerr, Andrew
Smith, Mark
Reid, Lynn
Baillie, Lynne
Adoption of Stroke Rehabilitation Technologies by the User Community: Qualitative Study
title Adoption of Stroke Rehabilitation Technologies by the User Community: Qualitative Study
title_full Adoption of Stroke Rehabilitation Technologies by the User Community: Qualitative Study
title_fullStr Adoption of Stroke Rehabilitation Technologies by the User Community: Qualitative Study
title_full_unstemmed Adoption of Stroke Rehabilitation Technologies by the User Community: Qualitative Study
title_short Adoption of Stroke Rehabilitation Technologies by the User Community: Qualitative Study
title_sort adoption of stroke rehabilitation technologies by the user community: qualitative study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6119213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30120086
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/rehab.9219
work_keys_str_mv AT kerrandrew adoptionofstrokerehabilitationtechnologiesbytheusercommunityqualitativestudy
AT smithmark adoptionofstrokerehabilitationtechnologiesbytheusercommunityqualitativestudy
AT reidlynn adoptionofstrokerehabilitationtechnologiesbytheusercommunityqualitativestudy
AT baillielynne adoptionofstrokerehabilitationtechnologiesbytheusercommunityqualitativestudy