Cargando…
Heckman imputation models for binary or continuous MNAR outcomes and MAR predictors
BACKGROUND: Multiple imputation by chained equations (MICE) requires specifying a suitable conditional imputation model for each incomplete variable and then iteratively imputes the missing values. In the presence of missing not at random (MNAR) outcomes, valid statistical inference often requires j...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6119269/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30170561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0547-1 |
_version_ | 1783352055336796160 |
---|---|
author | Galimard, Jacques-Emmanuel Chevret, Sylvie Curis, Emmanuel Resche-Rigon, Matthieu |
author_facet | Galimard, Jacques-Emmanuel Chevret, Sylvie Curis, Emmanuel Resche-Rigon, Matthieu |
author_sort | Galimard, Jacques-Emmanuel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Multiple imputation by chained equations (MICE) requires specifying a suitable conditional imputation model for each incomplete variable and then iteratively imputes the missing values. In the presence of missing not at random (MNAR) outcomes, valid statistical inference often requires joint models for missing observations and their indicators of missingness. In this study, we derived an imputation model for missing binary data with MNAR mechanism from Heckman’s model using a one-step maximum likelihood estimator. We applied this approach to improve a previously developed approach for MNAR continuous outcomes using Heckman’s model and a two-step estimator. These models allow us to use a MICE process and can thus also handle missing at random (MAR) predictors in the same MICE process. METHODS: We simulated 1000 datasets of 500 cases. We generated the following missing data mechanisms on 30% of the outcomes: MAR mechanism, weak MNAR mechanism, and strong MNAR mechanism. We then resimulated the first three cases and added an additional 30% of MAR data on a predictor, resulting in 50% of complete cases. We evaluated and compared the performance of the developed approach to that of a complete case approach and classical Heckman’s model estimates. RESULTS: With MNAR outcomes, only methods using Heckman’s model were unbiased, and with a MAR predictor, the developed imputation approach outperformed all the other approaches. CONCLUSIONS: In the presence of MAR predictors, we proposed a simple approach to address MNAR binary or continuous outcomes under a Heckman assumption in a MICE procedure. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12874-018-0547-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6119269 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61192692018-09-05 Heckman imputation models for binary or continuous MNAR outcomes and MAR predictors Galimard, Jacques-Emmanuel Chevret, Sylvie Curis, Emmanuel Resche-Rigon, Matthieu BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Multiple imputation by chained equations (MICE) requires specifying a suitable conditional imputation model for each incomplete variable and then iteratively imputes the missing values. In the presence of missing not at random (MNAR) outcomes, valid statistical inference often requires joint models for missing observations and their indicators of missingness. In this study, we derived an imputation model for missing binary data with MNAR mechanism from Heckman’s model using a one-step maximum likelihood estimator. We applied this approach to improve a previously developed approach for MNAR continuous outcomes using Heckman’s model and a two-step estimator. These models allow us to use a MICE process and can thus also handle missing at random (MAR) predictors in the same MICE process. METHODS: We simulated 1000 datasets of 500 cases. We generated the following missing data mechanisms on 30% of the outcomes: MAR mechanism, weak MNAR mechanism, and strong MNAR mechanism. We then resimulated the first three cases and added an additional 30% of MAR data on a predictor, resulting in 50% of complete cases. We evaluated and compared the performance of the developed approach to that of a complete case approach and classical Heckman’s model estimates. RESULTS: With MNAR outcomes, only methods using Heckman’s model were unbiased, and with a MAR predictor, the developed imputation approach outperformed all the other approaches. CONCLUSIONS: In the presence of MAR predictors, we proposed a simple approach to address MNAR binary or continuous outcomes under a Heckman assumption in a MICE procedure. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12874-018-0547-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6119269/ /pubmed/30170561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0547-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Galimard, Jacques-Emmanuel Chevret, Sylvie Curis, Emmanuel Resche-Rigon, Matthieu Heckman imputation models for binary or continuous MNAR outcomes and MAR predictors |
title | Heckman imputation models for binary or continuous MNAR outcomes and MAR predictors |
title_full | Heckman imputation models for binary or continuous MNAR outcomes and MAR predictors |
title_fullStr | Heckman imputation models for binary or continuous MNAR outcomes and MAR predictors |
title_full_unstemmed | Heckman imputation models for binary or continuous MNAR outcomes and MAR predictors |
title_short | Heckman imputation models for binary or continuous MNAR outcomes and MAR predictors |
title_sort | heckman imputation models for binary or continuous mnar outcomes and mar predictors |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6119269/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30170561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0547-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT galimardjacquesemmanuel heckmanimputationmodelsforbinaryorcontinuousmnaroutcomesandmarpredictors AT chevretsylvie heckmanimputationmodelsforbinaryorcontinuousmnaroutcomesandmarpredictors AT curisemmanuel heckmanimputationmodelsforbinaryorcontinuousmnaroutcomesandmarpredictors AT rescherigonmatthieu heckmanimputationmodelsforbinaryorcontinuousmnaroutcomesandmarpredictors |