Cargando…

Trends in gender and socioeconomic inequalities in mental health following the Great Recession and subsequent austerity policies: a repeat cross-sectional analysis of the Health Surveys for England

OBJECTIVE: It is known that mental health deteriorated following the 2008 global financial crisis, and that subsequent UK austerity policies post-2010 disproportionately impacted women and those in deprived areas. We aimed to assess whether gender and socioeconomic inequalities in poor mental health...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thomson, Rachel M, Niedzwiedz, Claire L, Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6119415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30166307
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022924
_version_ 1783352079383789568
author Thomson, Rachel M
Niedzwiedz, Claire L
Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal
author_facet Thomson, Rachel M
Niedzwiedz, Claire L
Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal
author_sort Thomson, Rachel M
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: It is known that mental health deteriorated following the 2008 global financial crisis, and that subsequent UK austerity policies post-2010 disproportionately impacted women and those in deprived areas. We aimed to assess whether gender and socioeconomic inequalities in poor mental health have changed since the onset of austerity policies. DESIGN: Repeat cross-sectional analysis of survey data. SETTING: England. PARTICIPANTS: Nationally and regionally representative samples of the working-age population (25–64 years) from the Health Survey for England (1991–2014). OUTCOME MEASURES: Population-level poor mental health was measured by General Health Questionnaire-12 (GHQ) caseness, stratified by gender and socioeconomic position (area-level deprivation and highest educational attainment). RESULTS: The prevalence of age-adjusted male GHQ caseness increased by 5.9% (95% CI 3.2% to 8.5%, p<0.001) from 2008 to 2009 in the immediate postrecession period, but recovered to prerecession levels after 2010. In women, there was little change in 2009 or 2010, but an increase of 3.0% (95% CI 1.0% to 5.1%, p=0.004) in 2012 compared with 2008 following the onset of austerity. Estimates were largely unchanged after further adjustment for socioeconomic position, employment status and household income as potential mediators. Relative socioeconomic inequalities in GHQ caseness narrowed from 2008 to 2010 immediately following the recession, with Relative Index of Inequality falling from 2.28 (95% CI 1.89 to 2.76, p<0.001) to 1.85 (95% CI 1.43 to 2.38, p<0.001), but returned to prerecession levels during austerity. CONCLUSIONS: Gender inequalities in poor mental health narrowed following the Great Recession but widened during austerity, creating the widest gender gap since 1994. Socioeconomic inequalities in poor mental health narrowed immediately postrecession, but this trend may now be reversing. Austerity policies could contribute to widening mental health inequalities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6119415
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61194152018-09-04 Trends in gender and socioeconomic inequalities in mental health following the Great Recession and subsequent austerity policies: a repeat cross-sectional analysis of the Health Surveys for England Thomson, Rachel M Niedzwiedz, Claire L Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal BMJ Open Mental Health OBJECTIVE: It is known that mental health deteriorated following the 2008 global financial crisis, and that subsequent UK austerity policies post-2010 disproportionately impacted women and those in deprived areas. We aimed to assess whether gender and socioeconomic inequalities in poor mental health have changed since the onset of austerity policies. DESIGN: Repeat cross-sectional analysis of survey data. SETTING: England. PARTICIPANTS: Nationally and regionally representative samples of the working-age population (25–64 years) from the Health Survey for England (1991–2014). OUTCOME MEASURES: Population-level poor mental health was measured by General Health Questionnaire-12 (GHQ) caseness, stratified by gender and socioeconomic position (area-level deprivation and highest educational attainment). RESULTS: The prevalence of age-adjusted male GHQ caseness increased by 5.9% (95% CI 3.2% to 8.5%, p<0.001) from 2008 to 2009 in the immediate postrecession period, but recovered to prerecession levels after 2010. In women, there was little change in 2009 or 2010, but an increase of 3.0% (95% CI 1.0% to 5.1%, p=0.004) in 2012 compared with 2008 following the onset of austerity. Estimates were largely unchanged after further adjustment for socioeconomic position, employment status and household income as potential mediators. Relative socioeconomic inequalities in GHQ caseness narrowed from 2008 to 2010 immediately following the recession, with Relative Index of Inequality falling from 2.28 (95% CI 1.89 to 2.76, p<0.001) to 1.85 (95% CI 1.43 to 2.38, p<0.001), but returned to prerecession levels during austerity. CONCLUSIONS: Gender inequalities in poor mental health narrowed following the Great Recession but widened during austerity, creating the widest gender gap since 1994. Socioeconomic inequalities in poor mental health narrowed immediately postrecession, but this trend may now be reversing. Austerity policies could contribute to widening mental health inequalities. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6119415/ /pubmed/30166307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022924 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Mental Health
Thomson, Rachel M
Niedzwiedz, Claire L
Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal
Trends in gender and socioeconomic inequalities in mental health following the Great Recession and subsequent austerity policies: a repeat cross-sectional analysis of the Health Surveys for England
title Trends in gender and socioeconomic inequalities in mental health following the Great Recession and subsequent austerity policies: a repeat cross-sectional analysis of the Health Surveys for England
title_full Trends in gender and socioeconomic inequalities in mental health following the Great Recession and subsequent austerity policies: a repeat cross-sectional analysis of the Health Surveys for England
title_fullStr Trends in gender and socioeconomic inequalities in mental health following the Great Recession and subsequent austerity policies: a repeat cross-sectional analysis of the Health Surveys for England
title_full_unstemmed Trends in gender and socioeconomic inequalities in mental health following the Great Recession and subsequent austerity policies: a repeat cross-sectional analysis of the Health Surveys for England
title_short Trends in gender and socioeconomic inequalities in mental health following the Great Recession and subsequent austerity policies: a repeat cross-sectional analysis of the Health Surveys for England
title_sort trends in gender and socioeconomic inequalities in mental health following the great recession and subsequent austerity policies: a repeat cross-sectional analysis of the health surveys for england
topic Mental Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6119415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30166307
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022924
work_keys_str_mv AT thomsonrachelm trendsingenderandsocioeconomicinequalitiesinmentalhealthfollowingthegreatrecessionandsubsequentausteritypoliciesarepeatcrosssectionalanalysisofthehealthsurveysforengland
AT niedzwiedzclairel trendsingenderandsocioeconomicinequalitiesinmentalhealthfollowingthegreatrecessionandsubsequentausteritypoliciesarepeatcrosssectionalanalysisofthehealthsurveysforengland
AT katikireddisrinivasavittal trendsingenderandsocioeconomicinequalitiesinmentalhealthfollowingthegreatrecessionandsubsequentausteritypoliciesarepeatcrosssectionalanalysisofthehealthsurveysforengland