Cargando…
Trends in gender and socioeconomic inequalities in mental health following the Great Recession and subsequent austerity policies: a repeat cross-sectional analysis of the Health Surveys for England
OBJECTIVE: It is known that mental health deteriorated following the 2008 global financial crisis, and that subsequent UK austerity policies post-2010 disproportionately impacted women and those in deprived areas. We aimed to assess whether gender and socioeconomic inequalities in poor mental health...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6119415/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30166307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022924 |
_version_ | 1783352079383789568 |
---|---|
author | Thomson, Rachel M Niedzwiedz, Claire L Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal |
author_facet | Thomson, Rachel M Niedzwiedz, Claire L Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal |
author_sort | Thomson, Rachel M |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: It is known that mental health deteriorated following the 2008 global financial crisis, and that subsequent UK austerity policies post-2010 disproportionately impacted women and those in deprived areas. We aimed to assess whether gender and socioeconomic inequalities in poor mental health have changed since the onset of austerity policies. DESIGN: Repeat cross-sectional analysis of survey data. SETTING: England. PARTICIPANTS: Nationally and regionally representative samples of the working-age population (25–64 years) from the Health Survey for England (1991–2014). OUTCOME MEASURES: Population-level poor mental health was measured by General Health Questionnaire-12 (GHQ) caseness, stratified by gender and socioeconomic position (area-level deprivation and highest educational attainment). RESULTS: The prevalence of age-adjusted male GHQ caseness increased by 5.9% (95% CI 3.2% to 8.5%, p<0.001) from 2008 to 2009 in the immediate postrecession period, but recovered to prerecession levels after 2010. In women, there was little change in 2009 or 2010, but an increase of 3.0% (95% CI 1.0% to 5.1%, p=0.004) in 2012 compared with 2008 following the onset of austerity. Estimates were largely unchanged after further adjustment for socioeconomic position, employment status and household income as potential mediators. Relative socioeconomic inequalities in GHQ caseness narrowed from 2008 to 2010 immediately following the recession, with Relative Index of Inequality falling from 2.28 (95% CI 1.89 to 2.76, p<0.001) to 1.85 (95% CI 1.43 to 2.38, p<0.001), but returned to prerecession levels during austerity. CONCLUSIONS: Gender inequalities in poor mental health narrowed following the Great Recession but widened during austerity, creating the widest gender gap since 1994. Socioeconomic inequalities in poor mental health narrowed immediately postrecession, but this trend may now be reversing. Austerity policies could contribute to widening mental health inequalities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6119415 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61194152018-09-04 Trends in gender and socioeconomic inequalities in mental health following the Great Recession and subsequent austerity policies: a repeat cross-sectional analysis of the Health Surveys for England Thomson, Rachel M Niedzwiedz, Claire L Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal BMJ Open Mental Health OBJECTIVE: It is known that mental health deteriorated following the 2008 global financial crisis, and that subsequent UK austerity policies post-2010 disproportionately impacted women and those in deprived areas. We aimed to assess whether gender and socioeconomic inequalities in poor mental health have changed since the onset of austerity policies. DESIGN: Repeat cross-sectional analysis of survey data. SETTING: England. PARTICIPANTS: Nationally and regionally representative samples of the working-age population (25–64 years) from the Health Survey for England (1991–2014). OUTCOME MEASURES: Population-level poor mental health was measured by General Health Questionnaire-12 (GHQ) caseness, stratified by gender and socioeconomic position (area-level deprivation and highest educational attainment). RESULTS: The prevalence of age-adjusted male GHQ caseness increased by 5.9% (95% CI 3.2% to 8.5%, p<0.001) from 2008 to 2009 in the immediate postrecession period, but recovered to prerecession levels after 2010. In women, there was little change in 2009 or 2010, but an increase of 3.0% (95% CI 1.0% to 5.1%, p=0.004) in 2012 compared with 2008 following the onset of austerity. Estimates were largely unchanged after further adjustment for socioeconomic position, employment status and household income as potential mediators. Relative socioeconomic inequalities in GHQ caseness narrowed from 2008 to 2010 immediately following the recession, with Relative Index of Inequality falling from 2.28 (95% CI 1.89 to 2.76, p<0.001) to 1.85 (95% CI 1.43 to 2.38, p<0.001), but returned to prerecession levels during austerity. CONCLUSIONS: Gender inequalities in poor mental health narrowed following the Great Recession but widened during austerity, creating the widest gender gap since 1994. Socioeconomic inequalities in poor mental health narrowed immediately postrecession, but this trend may now be reversing. Austerity policies could contribute to widening mental health inequalities. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6119415/ /pubmed/30166307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022924 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Mental Health Thomson, Rachel M Niedzwiedz, Claire L Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal Trends in gender and socioeconomic inequalities in mental health following the Great Recession and subsequent austerity policies: a repeat cross-sectional analysis of the Health Surveys for England |
title | Trends in gender and socioeconomic inequalities in mental health following the Great Recession and subsequent austerity policies: a repeat cross-sectional analysis of the Health Surveys for England |
title_full | Trends in gender and socioeconomic inequalities in mental health following the Great Recession and subsequent austerity policies: a repeat cross-sectional analysis of the Health Surveys for England |
title_fullStr | Trends in gender and socioeconomic inequalities in mental health following the Great Recession and subsequent austerity policies: a repeat cross-sectional analysis of the Health Surveys for England |
title_full_unstemmed | Trends in gender and socioeconomic inequalities in mental health following the Great Recession and subsequent austerity policies: a repeat cross-sectional analysis of the Health Surveys for England |
title_short | Trends in gender and socioeconomic inequalities in mental health following the Great Recession and subsequent austerity policies: a repeat cross-sectional analysis of the Health Surveys for England |
title_sort | trends in gender and socioeconomic inequalities in mental health following the great recession and subsequent austerity policies: a repeat cross-sectional analysis of the health surveys for england |
topic | Mental Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6119415/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30166307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022924 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thomsonrachelm trendsingenderandsocioeconomicinequalitiesinmentalhealthfollowingthegreatrecessionandsubsequentausteritypoliciesarepeatcrosssectionalanalysisofthehealthsurveysforengland AT niedzwiedzclairel trendsingenderandsocioeconomicinequalitiesinmentalhealthfollowingthegreatrecessionandsubsequentausteritypoliciesarepeatcrosssectionalanalysisofthehealthsurveysforengland AT katikireddisrinivasavittal trendsingenderandsocioeconomicinequalitiesinmentalhealthfollowingthegreatrecessionandsubsequentausteritypoliciesarepeatcrosssectionalanalysisofthehealthsurveysforengland |