Cargando…

Health Canada’s use of expedited review pathways and therapeutic innovation, 1995–2016: cross-sectional analysis

OBJECTIVES: This study examines the use of expedited approval pathways by Health Canada over the period 1995 to 2016 inclusive and the relationship between the use of these pathways and the therapeutic gain offered by new products. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. DATA SOURCES: Therapeutic Products Di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Lexchin, Joel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6119438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30166310
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023605
_version_ 1783352084929708032
author Lexchin, Joel
author_facet Lexchin, Joel
author_sort Lexchin, Joel
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study examines the use of expedited approval pathways by Health Canada over the period 1995 to 2016 inclusive and the relationship between the use of these pathways and the therapeutic gain offered by new products. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. DATA SOURCES: Therapeutic Products Directorate, Biologics and Genetic Therapies Directorate, Notice of Compliance database, Notice of Compliance with conditions web site, Patented Medicine Prices Review Board, La revue Prescrire, WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification system. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Percent of new drugs evaluated by Health Canada that went through an expedited pathway between 1995 and 2016 inclusive. Kappa values comparing the review status with assessments of therapeutic value for individual drugs. RESULTS: Of 623 drugs approved by Health Canada between 1995 and 2016, 438 (70.3%) drugs went through the standard pathway and 185 (29.7%) an expedited pathway. Therapeutic evaluations were available for 509 drugs. Health Canada used an expedited approval pathway for 159 of the 509 drugs, whereas only 55 were judged to be therapeutically innovative. Forty-two of the 55 therapeutically innovative drugs received an expedited review and 13 received a standard review. The Kappa value for the entire period for all 509 drugs was 0.276 (95% CI 0.194 to 0.359) indicating ‘fair’ agreement between Health Canada’s use of expedited pathways and independent evaluations of therapeutic innovation. CONCLUSION: Health Canada’s use of expedited approvals was stable over the entire time period. It was unable to reliably predict which drugs will offer major therapeutic gains. The findings in this study should provoke a discussion about whether Health Canada should continue to use these pathways and if so how their use can be improved.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6119438
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61194382018-09-04 Health Canada’s use of expedited review pathways and therapeutic innovation, 1995–2016: cross-sectional analysis Lexchin, Joel BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVES: This study examines the use of expedited approval pathways by Health Canada over the period 1995 to 2016 inclusive and the relationship between the use of these pathways and the therapeutic gain offered by new products. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. DATA SOURCES: Therapeutic Products Directorate, Biologics and Genetic Therapies Directorate, Notice of Compliance database, Notice of Compliance with conditions web site, Patented Medicine Prices Review Board, La revue Prescrire, WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification system. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Percent of new drugs evaluated by Health Canada that went through an expedited pathway between 1995 and 2016 inclusive. Kappa values comparing the review status with assessments of therapeutic value for individual drugs. RESULTS: Of 623 drugs approved by Health Canada between 1995 and 2016, 438 (70.3%) drugs went through the standard pathway and 185 (29.7%) an expedited pathway. Therapeutic evaluations were available for 509 drugs. Health Canada used an expedited approval pathway for 159 of the 509 drugs, whereas only 55 were judged to be therapeutically innovative. Forty-two of the 55 therapeutically innovative drugs received an expedited review and 13 received a standard review. The Kappa value for the entire period for all 509 drugs was 0.276 (95% CI 0.194 to 0.359) indicating ‘fair’ agreement between Health Canada’s use of expedited pathways and independent evaluations of therapeutic innovation. CONCLUSION: Health Canada’s use of expedited approvals was stable over the entire time period. It was unable to reliably predict which drugs will offer major therapeutic gains. The findings in this study should provoke a discussion about whether Health Canada should continue to use these pathways and if so how their use can be improved. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6119438/ /pubmed/30166310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023605 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Lexchin, Joel
Health Canada’s use of expedited review pathways and therapeutic innovation, 1995–2016: cross-sectional analysis
title Health Canada’s use of expedited review pathways and therapeutic innovation, 1995–2016: cross-sectional analysis
title_full Health Canada’s use of expedited review pathways and therapeutic innovation, 1995–2016: cross-sectional analysis
title_fullStr Health Canada’s use of expedited review pathways and therapeutic innovation, 1995–2016: cross-sectional analysis
title_full_unstemmed Health Canada’s use of expedited review pathways and therapeutic innovation, 1995–2016: cross-sectional analysis
title_short Health Canada’s use of expedited review pathways and therapeutic innovation, 1995–2016: cross-sectional analysis
title_sort health canada’s use of expedited review pathways and therapeutic innovation, 1995–2016: cross-sectional analysis
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6119438/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30166310
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023605
work_keys_str_mv AT lexchinjoel healthcanadasuseofexpeditedreviewpathwaysandtherapeuticinnovation19952016crosssectionalanalysis