Cargando…

ClinGen’s RASopathy Expert Panel Consensus Methods for Variant Interpretation

PURPOSE: Standardized and accurate variant assessment is essential for effective medical care. To that end, Clinical Genome (ClinGen) Resource clinical domain working groups (CDWG) are systematically reviewing disease-associated genes for sufficient evidence to support disease causality and creating...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gelb, Bruce D., Cavé, Hélène, Dillon, Mitchell W., Gripp, Karen W., Lee, Jennifer A., Mason-Suares, Heather, Rauen, Katherine A., Williams, Bradley, Zenker, Martin, Vincent, Lisa M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6119537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29493581
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/gim.2018.3
_version_ 1783352093083435008
author Gelb, Bruce D.
Cavé, Hélène
Dillon, Mitchell W.
Gripp, Karen W.
Lee, Jennifer A.
Mason-Suares, Heather
Rauen, Katherine A.
Williams, Bradley
Zenker, Martin
Vincent, Lisa M.
author_facet Gelb, Bruce D.
Cavé, Hélène
Dillon, Mitchell W.
Gripp, Karen W.
Lee, Jennifer A.
Mason-Suares, Heather
Rauen, Katherine A.
Williams, Bradley
Zenker, Martin
Vincent, Lisa M.
author_sort Gelb, Bruce D.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Standardized and accurate variant assessment is essential for effective medical care. To that end, Clinical Genome (ClinGen) Resource clinical domain working groups (CDWG) are systematically reviewing disease-associated genes for sufficient evidence to support disease causality and creating disease-specific specifications of ACMG-AMP guidelines for consistent and accurate variant classification. METHODS: The ClinGen RASopathy CDWG established an expert panel (EP) to curate gene information and generate gene and disease-specific specifications to ACMG-AMP variant classification framework. These specifications were tested by classifying 37 exemplar pathogenic variants plus an additional 66 variants in ClinVar distributed across nine RASopathy genes. RESULTS: RASopathy-related specifications were applied to sixteen ACMG-AMP criteria, with five also having adjustable strength with availability of additional evidence. Another five criteria were deemed not applicable. Key adjustments to minor allele frequency thresholds, multiple de novo occurrence events and/or segregation, and strength adjustments impacted 60% of variant classifications. Unpublished case-level data from participating laboratories impacted 45% of classifications supporting the need for data sharing. CONCLUSIONS: RAS-specific ACMG-AMP specifications optimized the utility of available clinical evidence and Ras/MAPK pathway-specific characteristics to consistently classify RASopathy-associated variants. These specifications highlight how grouping genes by shared features promotes rapid multi-genic variant assessment without sacrificing specificity and accuracy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6119537
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61195372018-09-01 ClinGen’s RASopathy Expert Panel Consensus Methods for Variant Interpretation Gelb, Bruce D. Cavé, Hélène Dillon, Mitchell W. Gripp, Karen W. Lee, Jennifer A. Mason-Suares, Heather Rauen, Katherine A. Williams, Bradley Zenker, Martin Vincent, Lisa M. Genet Med Article PURPOSE: Standardized and accurate variant assessment is essential for effective medical care. To that end, Clinical Genome (ClinGen) Resource clinical domain working groups (CDWG) are systematically reviewing disease-associated genes for sufficient evidence to support disease causality and creating disease-specific specifications of ACMG-AMP guidelines for consistent and accurate variant classification. METHODS: The ClinGen RASopathy CDWG established an expert panel (EP) to curate gene information and generate gene and disease-specific specifications to ACMG-AMP variant classification framework. These specifications were tested by classifying 37 exemplar pathogenic variants plus an additional 66 variants in ClinVar distributed across nine RASopathy genes. RESULTS: RASopathy-related specifications were applied to sixteen ACMG-AMP criteria, with five also having adjustable strength with availability of additional evidence. Another five criteria were deemed not applicable. Key adjustments to minor allele frequency thresholds, multiple de novo occurrence events and/or segregation, and strength adjustments impacted 60% of variant classifications. Unpublished case-level data from participating laboratories impacted 45% of classifications supporting the need for data sharing. CONCLUSIONS: RAS-specific ACMG-AMP specifications optimized the utility of available clinical evidence and Ras/MAPK pathway-specific characteristics to consistently classify RASopathy-associated variants. These specifications highlight how grouping genes by shared features promotes rapid multi-genic variant assessment without sacrificing specificity and accuracy. 2018-03-01 2018-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6119537/ /pubmed/29493581 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/gim.2018.3 Text en http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms
spellingShingle Article
Gelb, Bruce D.
Cavé, Hélène
Dillon, Mitchell W.
Gripp, Karen W.
Lee, Jennifer A.
Mason-Suares, Heather
Rauen, Katherine A.
Williams, Bradley
Zenker, Martin
Vincent, Lisa M.
ClinGen’s RASopathy Expert Panel Consensus Methods for Variant Interpretation
title ClinGen’s RASopathy Expert Panel Consensus Methods for Variant Interpretation
title_full ClinGen’s RASopathy Expert Panel Consensus Methods for Variant Interpretation
title_fullStr ClinGen’s RASopathy Expert Panel Consensus Methods for Variant Interpretation
title_full_unstemmed ClinGen’s RASopathy Expert Panel Consensus Methods for Variant Interpretation
title_short ClinGen’s RASopathy Expert Panel Consensus Methods for Variant Interpretation
title_sort clingen’s rasopathy expert panel consensus methods for variant interpretation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6119537/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29493581
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/gim.2018.3
work_keys_str_mv AT gelbbruced clingensrasopathyexpertpanelconsensusmethodsforvariantinterpretation
AT cavehelene clingensrasopathyexpertpanelconsensusmethodsforvariantinterpretation
AT dillonmitchellw clingensrasopathyexpertpanelconsensusmethodsforvariantinterpretation
AT grippkarenw clingensrasopathyexpertpanelconsensusmethodsforvariantinterpretation
AT leejennifera clingensrasopathyexpertpanelconsensusmethodsforvariantinterpretation
AT masonsuaresheather clingensrasopathyexpertpanelconsensusmethodsforvariantinterpretation
AT rauenkatherinea clingensrasopathyexpertpanelconsensusmethodsforvariantinterpretation
AT williamsbradley clingensrasopathyexpertpanelconsensusmethodsforvariantinterpretation
AT zenkermartin clingensrasopathyexpertpanelconsensusmethodsforvariantinterpretation
AT vincentlisam clingensrasopathyexpertpanelconsensusmethodsforvariantinterpretation
AT clingensrasopathyexpertpanelconsensusmethodsforvariantinterpretation