Cargando…

Changes in metabolism but not myocellular signaling by training with CHO‐restriction in endurance athletes

Carbohydrate (CHO) restricted training has been shown to increase the acute training response, whereas less is known about the acute effects after repeated CHO restricted training. On two occasions, the acute responses to CHO restriction were examined in endurance athletes. Study 1 examined cellular...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gejl, Kasper D., Vissing, Kristian, Hansen, Mette, Thams, Line, Rokkedal‐Lausch, Torben, Plomgaard, Peter, Meinild Lundby, Anne‐Kristine, Nybo, Lars, Jensen, Kurt, Holmberg, Hans‐Christer, Ørtenblad, Niels
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6119686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30175557
http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.13847
_version_ 1783352111255257088
author Gejl, Kasper D.
Vissing, Kristian
Hansen, Mette
Thams, Line
Rokkedal‐Lausch, Torben
Plomgaard, Peter
Meinild Lundby, Anne‐Kristine
Nybo, Lars
Jensen, Kurt
Holmberg, Hans‐Christer
Ørtenblad, Niels
author_facet Gejl, Kasper D.
Vissing, Kristian
Hansen, Mette
Thams, Line
Rokkedal‐Lausch, Torben
Plomgaard, Peter
Meinild Lundby, Anne‐Kristine
Nybo, Lars
Jensen, Kurt
Holmberg, Hans‐Christer
Ørtenblad, Niels
author_sort Gejl, Kasper D.
collection PubMed
description Carbohydrate (CHO) restricted training has been shown to increase the acute training response, whereas less is known about the acute effects after repeated CHO restricted training. On two occasions, the acute responses to CHO restriction were examined in endurance athletes. Study 1 examined cellular signaling and metabolic responses after seven training‐days including CHO manipulation (n = 16). The protocol consisted of 1 h high‐intensity cycling, followed by 7 h recovery, and 2 h of moderate‐intensity exercise (120SS). Athletes were randomly assigned to low (LCHO: 80 g) or high (HCHO: 415 g) CHO during recovery and the 120SS. Study 2 examined unaccustomed exposure to the same training protocol (n = 12). In Study 1, muscle biopsies were obtained at rest and 1 h after 120SS, and blood samples drawn during the 120SS. In Study 2, substrate oxidation and plasma glucagon were determined. In Study 1, plasma insulin and proinsulin C‐peptide were higher during the 120SS in HCHO compared to LCHO (insulin: 0 min: +37%; 60 min: +135%; 120 min: +357%, P = 0.05; proinsulin C‐peptide: 0 min: +32%; 60 min: +52%; 120 min: +79%, P = 0.02), whereas plasma cholesterol was higher in LCHO (+15–17%, P = 0.03). Myocellular signaling did not differ between groups. p‐AMPK and p‐ACC were increased after 120SS (+35%, P = 0.03; +59%, P = 0.0004, respectively), with no alterations in p‐p38, p‐53, or p‐CREB. In Study 2, glucagon and fat oxidation were higher in LCHO compared to HCHO during the 120SS (+26–40%, P = 0.03; +44‐76%, P = 0.01 respectively). In conclusion, the clear respiratory and hematological effects of CHO restricted training were not translated into superior myocellular signaling after accustomization to CHO restriction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6119686
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61196862018-09-05 Changes in metabolism but not myocellular signaling by training with CHO‐restriction in endurance athletes Gejl, Kasper D. Vissing, Kristian Hansen, Mette Thams, Line Rokkedal‐Lausch, Torben Plomgaard, Peter Meinild Lundby, Anne‐Kristine Nybo, Lars Jensen, Kurt Holmberg, Hans‐Christer Ørtenblad, Niels Physiol Rep Original Research Carbohydrate (CHO) restricted training has been shown to increase the acute training response, whereas less is known about the acute effects after repeated CHO restricted training. On two occasions, the acute responses to CHO restriction were examined in endurance athletes. Study 1 examined cellular signaling and metabolic responses after seven training‐days including CHO manipulation (n = 16). The protocol consisted of 1 h high‐intensity cycling, followed by 7 h recovery, and 2 h of moderate‐intensity exercise (120SS). Athletes were randomly assigned to low (LCHO: 80 g) or high (HCHO: 415 g) CHO during recovery and the 120SS. Study 2 examined unaccustomed exposure to the same training protocol (n = 12). In Study 1, muscle biopsies were obtained at rest and 1 h after 120SS, and blood samples drawn during the 120SS. In Study 2, substrate oxidation and plasma glucagon were determined. In Study 1, plasma insulin and proinsulin C‐peptide were higher during the 120SS in HCHO compared to LCHO (insulin: 0 min: +37%; 60 min: +135%; 120 min: +357%, P = 0.05; proinsulin C‐peptide: 0 min: +32%; 60 min: +52%; 120 min: +79%, P = 0.02), whereas plasma cholesterol was higher in LCHO (+15–17%, P = 0.03). Myocellular signaling did not differ between groups. p‐AMPK and p‐ACC were increased after 120SS (+35%, P = 0.03; +59%, P = 0.0004, respectively), with no alterations in p‐p38, p‐53, or p‐CREB. In Study 2, glucagon and fat oxidation were higher in LCHO compared to HCHO during the 120SS (+26–40%, P = 0.03; +44‐76%, P = 0.01 respectively). In conclusion, the clear respiratory and hematological effects of CHO restricted training were not translated into superior myocellular signaling after accustomization to CHO restriction. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6119686/ /pubmed/30175557 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.13847 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Gejl, Kasper D.
Vissing, Kristian
Hansen, Mette
Thams, Line
Rokkedal‐Lausch, Torben
Plomgaard, Peter
Meinild Lundby, Anne‐Kristine
Nybo, Lars
Jensen, Kurt
Holmberg, Hans‐Christer
Ørtenblad, Niels
Changes in metabolism but not myocellular signaling by training with CHO‐restriction in endurance athletes
title Changes in metabolism but not myocellular signaling by training with CHO‐restriction in endurance athletes
title_full Changes in metabolism but not myocellular signaling by training with CHO‐restriction in endurance athletes
title_fullStr Changes in metabolism but not myocellular signaling by training with CHO‐restriction in endurance athletes
title_full_unstemmed Changes in metabolism but not myocellular signaling by training with CHO‐restriction in endurance athletes
title_short Changes in metabolism but not myocellular signaling by training with CHO‐restriction in endurance athletes
title_sort changes in metabolism but not myocellular signaling by training with cho‐restriction in endurance athletes
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6119686/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30175557
http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.13847
work_keys_str_mv AT gejlkasperd changesinmetabolismbutnotmyocellularsignalingbytrainingwithchorestrictioninenduranceathletes
AT vissingkristian changesinmetabolismbutnotmyocellularsignalingbytrainingwithchorestrictioninenduranceathletes
AT hansenmette changesinmetabolismbutnotmyocellularsignalingbytrainingwithchorestrictioninenduranceathletes
AT thamsline changesinmetabolismbutnotmyocellularsignalingbytrainingwithchorestrictioninenduranceathletes
AT rokkedallauschtorben changesinmetabolismbutnotmyocellularsignalingbytrainingwithchorestrictioninenduranceathletes
AT plomgaardpeter changesinmetabolismbutnotmyocellularsignalingbytrainingwithchorestrictioninenduranceathletes
AT meinildlundbyannekristine changesinmetabolismbutnotmyocellularsignalingbytrainingwithchorestrictioninenduranceathletes
AT nybolars changesinmetabolismbutnotmyocellularsignalingbytrainingwithchorestrictioninenduranceathletes
AT jensenkurt changesinmetabolismbutnotmyocellularsignalingbytrainingwithchorestrictioninenduranceathletes
AT holmberghanschrister changesinmetabolismbutnotmyocellularsignalingbytrainingwithchorestrictioninenduranceathletes
AT ørtenbladniels changesinmetabolismbutnotmyocellularsignalingbytrainingwithchorestrictioninenduranceathletes