Cargando…

Is There a Difference in Staging and Treatment of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Tumors Between Tertiary Care and Community‐Based Institutions?

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the differences in the staging and treatment of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma between a tertiary care center and community‐based practices. METHODS: This study is a retrospective chart review of 943 adult patients with head and neck squamous cell canc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Akkina, Sarah R., Kim, Roderick Y., Stucken, Chaz L., Pynnonen, Melissa A., Bradford, Carol R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6119783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30186960
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.178
_version_ 1783352132397694976
author Akkina, Sarah R.
Kim, Roderick Y.
Stucken, Chaz L.
Pynnonen, Melissa A.
Bradford, Carol R.
author_facet Akkina, Sarah R.
Kim, Roderick Y.
Stucken, Chaz L.
Pynnonen, Melissa A.
Bradford, Carol R.
author_sort Akkina, Sarah R.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To characterize the differences in the staging and treatment of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma between a tertiary care center and community‐based practices. METHODS: This study is a retrospective chart review of 943 adult patients with head and neck squamous cell cancer presenting to a tertiary care center between 2008 and 2014 as part of the University of Michigan Head and Neck Cancer Specialized Program of Research Excellence (UM HN‐SPORE) database. Demographic information, diagnostic testing, staging information, and treatment recommendations were recorded. RESULTS: Of 943 patients reviewed, 159 had documentation of tumor stage that was assigned by the community‐based practice. Of these, 53% had a tumor staging change made at the tertiary care center, with 43% of patients upstaged and 10% of patients downstaged. Fifty‐one percent received different treatment than had previously been offered at the community‐based practice, although only 31% of these patients had a change in tumor staging. CONCLUSION: Over half of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma who are evaluated at a tertiary care center after the initial evaluation at a community‐based practice have their tumors staged differently, with the majority upstaged. A significant number of these patients also received different treatment than was initially offered at the referring practice. Future studies are required to determine whether these differences have an effect on tumor recurrence and patient survival rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2c (Outcomes Research).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6119783
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61197832018-09-05 Is There a Difference in Staging and Treatment of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Tumors Between Tertiary Care and Community‐Based Institutions? Akkina, Sarah R. Kim, Roderick Y. Stucken, Chaz L. Pynnonen, Melissa A. Bradford, Carol R. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol Head and Neck, and Tumor Biology OBJECTIVE: To characterize the differences in the staging and treatment of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma between a tertiary care center and community‐based practices. METHODS: This study is a retrospective chart review of 943 adult patients with head and neck squamous cell cancer presenting to a tertiary care center between 2008 and 2014 as part of the University of Michigan Head and Neck Cancer Specialized Program of Research Excellence (UM HN‐SPORE) database. Demographic information, diagnostic testing, staging information, and treatment recommendations were recorded. RESULTS: Of 943 patients reviewed, 159 had documentation of tumor stage that was assigned by the community‐based practice. Of these, 53% had a tumor staging change made at the tertiary care center, with 43% of patients upstaged and 10% of patients downstaged. Fifty‐one percent received different treatment than had previously been offered at the community‐based practice, although only 31% of these patients had a change in tumor staging. CONCLUSION: Over half of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma who are evaluated at a tertiary care center after the initial evaluation at a community‐based practice have their tumors staged differently, with the majority upstaged. A significant number of these patients also received different treatment than was initially offered at the referring practice. Future studies are required to determine whether these differences have an effect on tumor recurrence and patient survival rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2c (Outcomes Research). John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6119783/ /pubmed/30186960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.178 Text en © 2018 The Authors Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The Triological Society This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Head and Neck, and Tumor Biology
Akkina, Sarah R.
Kim, Roderick Y.
Stucken, Chaz L.
Pynnonen, Melissa A.
Bradford, Carol R.
Is There a Difference in Staging and Treatment of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Tumors Between Tertiary Care and Community‐Based Institutions?
title Is There a Difference in Staging and Treatment of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Tumors Between Tertiary Care and Community‐Based Institutions?
title_full Is There a Difference in Staging and Treatment of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Tumors Between Tertiary Care and Community‐Based Institutions?
title_fullStr Is There a Difference in Staging and Treatment of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Tumors Between Tertiary Care and Community‐Based Institutions?
title_full_unstemmed Is There a Difference in Staging and Treatment of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Tumors Between Tertiary Care and Community‐Based Institutions?
title_short Is There a Difference in Staging and Treatment of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Tumors Between Tertiary Care and Community‐Based Institutions?
title_sort is there a difference in staging and treatment of head and neck squamous cell tumors between tertiary care and community‐based institutions?
topic Head and Neck, and Tumor Biology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6119783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30186960
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.178
work_keys_str_mv AT akkinasarahr isthereadifferenceinstagingandtreatmentofheadandnecksquamouscelltumorsbetweentertiarycareandcommunitybasedinstitutions
AT kimrodericky isthereadifferenceinstagingandtreatmentofheadandnecksquamouscelltumorsbetweentertiarycareandcommunitybasedinstitutions
AT stuckenchazl isthereadifferenceinstagingandtreatmentofheadandnecksquamouscelltumorsbetweentertiarycareandcommunitybasedinstitutions
AT pynnonenmelissaa isthereadifferenceinstagingandtreatmentofheadandnecksquamouscelltumorsbetweentertiarycareandcommunitybasedinstitutions
AT bradfordcarolr isthereadifferenceinstagingandtreatmentofheadandnecksquamouscelltumorsbetweentertiarycareandcommunitybasedinstitutions