Cargando…

Development of a standard form for assessing research grant applications from the perspective of patients

BACKGROUND: Health-research funding organizations are increasingly involving patient representatives in the assessment of grant applications. However, there is no consensus on an appropriate scope or definition of the patient perspective and the eligibility of potential patient reviewers to take on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Wit, Maarten, Teunissen, Truus, van Houtum, Lieke, Weide, Margriet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6120065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30186624
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-018-0112-4
_version_ 1783352196961665024
author de Wit, Maarten
Teunissen, Truus
van Houtum, Lieke
Weide, Margriet
author_facet de Wit, Maarten
Teunissen, Truus
van Houtum, Lieke
Weide, Margriet
author_sort de Wit, Maarten
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Health-research funding organizations are increasingly involving patient representatives in the assessment of grant applications. However, there is no consensus on an appropriate scope or definition of the patient perspective and the eligibility of potential patient reviewers to take on this role. The aim of our study is to develop a consensus-based template for patient reviewers to assess research grant applications from the patients’ perspective. We also defined a glossary of terms and definitions to help the patient reviewers in their assessment role. METHODS: Together with members of the Dutch Association of Health Care Funds (SGF) we developed an assessment form for patient reviewers following constant comparative analysis of existing review forms, a survey among all stakeholders, testing in three pilot training sessions, and a structured consensus process. RESULTS: A small SGF working group collected and analysed 20 patient assessment forms, used by 12 health foundations and one patient organization. One systematic literature review was included. By comparing and discussing items and assessment categories in subsequent workshops, a first template form was developed. This version was electronically distributed among the members of 10 patient panels of whom 67 patient reviewers filled in the survey. A second version was then presented at a final working group meeting where consensus was reached about a template with 12 categories covering 41 items important for patients. A brochure for patient reviewers, a guide for panel coordinators and a glossary were developed to accompany future implementation of the template. CONCLUSIONS: A template for patient reviewers to assess research grant applications is now available, based on the consensus of 21 Dutch health foundations. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40900-018-0112-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6120065
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61200652018-09-05 Development of a standard form for assessing research grant applications from the perspective of patients de Wit, Maarten Teunissen, Truus van Houtum, Lieke Weide, Margriet Res Involv Engagem Research Article BACKGROUND: Health-research funding organizations are increasingly involving patient representatives in the assessment of grant applications. However, there is no consensus on an appropriate scope or definition of the patient perspective and the eligibility of potential patient reviewers to take on this role. The aim of our study is to develop a consensus-based template for patient reviewers to assess research grant applications from the patients’ perspective. We also defined a glossary of terms and definitions to help the patient reviewers in their assessment role. METHODS: Together with members of the Dutch Association of Health Care Funds (SGF) we developed an assessment form for patient reviewers following constant comparative analysis of existing review forms, a survey among all stakeholders, testing in three pilot training sessions, and a structured consensus process. RESULTS: A small SGF working group collected and analysed 20 patient assessment forms, used by 12 health foundations and one patient organization. One systematic literature review was included. By comparing and discussing items and assessment categories in subsequent workshops, a first template form was developed. This version was electronically distributed among the members of 10 patient panels of whom 67 patient reviewers filled in the survey. A second version was then presented at a final working group meeting where consensus was reached about a template with 12 categories covering 41 items important for patients. A brochure for patient reviewers, a guide for panel coordinators and a glossary were developed to accompany future implementation of the template. CONCLUSIONS: A template for patient reviewers to assess research grant applications is now available, based on the consensus of 21 Dutch health foundations. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40900-018-0112-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6120065/ /pubmed/30186624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-018-0112-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
de Wit, Maarten
Teunissen, Truus
van Houtum, Lieke
Weide, Margriet
Development of a standard form for assessing research grant applications from the perspective of patients
title Development of a standard form for assessing research grant applications from the perspective of patients
title_full Development of a standard form for assessing research grant applications from the perspective of patients
title_fullStr Development of a standard form for assessing research grant applications from the perspective of patients
title_full_unstemmed Development of a standard form for assessing research grant applications from the perspective of patients
title_short Development of a standard form for assessing research grant applications from the perspective of patients
title_sort development of a standard form for assessing research grant applications from the perspective of patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6120065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30186624
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-018-0112-4
work_keys_str_mv AT dewitmaarten developmentofastandardformforassessingresearchgrantapplicationsfromtheperspectiveofpatients
AT teunissentruus developmentofastandardformforassessingresearchgrantapplicationsfromtheperspectiveofpatients
AT vanhoutumlieke developmentofastandardformforassessingresearchgrantapplicationsfromtheperspectiveofpatients
AT weidemargriet developmentofastandardformforassessingresearchgrantapplicationsfromtheperspectiveofpatients