Cargando…

Physicians’ roles in competency-based teaching: Do students recognize them?

Introduction: Imparting the concept of physician’s roles with the help of new teaching formats is becoming increasingly important in medical education. The “ambulatory care simulation” was developed at the Medical Faculty Mannheim as a format to teach the roles of "medical expert," “commun...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pippel, Elvira, Narciß, Elisabeth, Obertacke, Udo, Strohmer, Renate, Schüttpelz-Brauns, Katrin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6120155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30186947
http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma001183
_version_ 1783352218223640576
author Pippel, Elvira
Narciß, Elisabeth
Obertacke, Udo
Strohmer, Renate
Schüttpelz-Brauns, Katrin
author_facet Pippel, Elvira
Narciß, Elisabeth
Obertacke, Udo
Strohmer, Renate
Schüttpelz-Brauns, Katrin
author_sort Pippel, Elvira
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Imparting the concept of physician’s roles with the help of new teaching formats is becoming increasingly important in medical education. The “ambulatory care simulation” was developed at the Medical Faculty Mannheim as a format to teach the roles of "medical expert," “communicator”, “health advocate”, “manager”, “team member” and “professional” in the practical year. During the “ambulatory care simulation”, students work through case scenarios with simulated patients focusing on the physician’s roles and subsequently discussing and reflecting on their experiences. Several measures are designated to ensure that each role is covered by the new teaching format. The present study investigates whether the physician’s roles are actually addressed during the “ambulatory care simulation” and whether the competency-based learning objectives are recognized by the students. Methods: All participants in 12 of the 38 obligatory “ambulatory care simulations” signed informed consents to be filmed during the “ambulatory care simulation”. These videos were categorized using previously defined observation criteria. A total of 211 out of 224 students completed and handed in a one-minute paper at the end of the “ambulatory care simulation”. The answers to the question, “What have you learned?” have been assigned to competency-based learning objectives. Results: Although instructors and students adhered to the guidelines in the recorded “ambulatory care simulations”, the most frequently addressed roles were “medical expert” and “communicator.” Two-thirds of the participants indicate learning outcomes that do not correspond to the previously defined learning objectives of the “ambulatory care simulation”. Discussion: To ensure a thorough understanding and long-lasting appreciation of the physician’s roles, longitudinal integration of teaching interventions into the curriculum is to be favored over single teaching units. Instructors need intensive preparation for the unfamiliar construct of physician’s roles. The learning objectives must also be made more transparent. Conclusion: Especially complex teaching formats need to be evaluated for success if they are to achieve their aims. Formative evaluations enable verification of whether the learning objectives are 1. addressed, ; 2. recognized and, finally, ; 3. achieved. .
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6120155
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher German Medical Science GMS Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61201552018-09-05 Physicians’ roles in competency-based teaching: Do students recognize them? Pippel, Elvira Narciß, Elisabeth Obertacke, Udo Strohmer, Renate Schüttpelz-Brauns, Katrin GMS J Med Educ Article Introduction: Imparting the concept of physician’s roles with the help of new teaching formats is becoming increasingly important in medical education. The “ambulatory care simulation” was developed at the Medical Faculty Mannheim as a format to teach the roles of "medical expert," “communicator”, “health advocate”, “manager”, “team member” and “professional” in the practical year. During the “ambulatory care simulation”, students work through case scenarios with simulated patients focusing on the physician’s roles and subsequently discussing and reflecting on their experiences. Several measures are designated to ensure that each role is covered by the new teaching format. The present study investigates whether the physician’s roles are actually addressed during the “ambulatory care simulation” and whether the competency-based learning objectives are recognized by the students. Methods: All participants in 12 of the 38 obligatory “ambulatory care simulations” signed informed consents to be filmed during the “ambulatory care simulation”. These videos were categorized using previously defined observation criteria. A total of 211 out of 224 students completed and handed in a one-minute paper at the end of the “ambulatory care simulation”. The answers to the question, “What have you learned?” have been assigned to competency-based learning objectives. Results: Although instructors and students adhered to the guidelines in the recorded “ambulatory care simulations”, the most frequently addressed roles were “medical expert” and “communicator.” Two-thirds of the participants indicate learning outcomes that do not correspond to the previously defined learning objectives of the “ambulatory care simulation”. Discussion: To ensure a thorough understanding and long-lasting appreciation of the physician’s roles, longitudinal integration of teaching interventions into the curriculum is to be favored over single teaching units. Instructors need intensive preparation for the unfamiliar construct of physician’s roles. The learning objectives must also be made more transparent. Conclusion: Especially complex teaching formats need to be evaluated for success if they are to achieve their aims. Formative evaluations enable verification of whether the learning objectives are 1. addressed, ; 2. recognized and, finally, ; 3. achieved. . German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2018-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6120155/ /pubmed/30186947 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma001183 Text en Copyright © 2018 Pippel et al. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Pippel, Elvira
Narciß, Elisabeth
Obertacke, Udo
Strohmer, Renate
Schüttpelz-Brauns, Katrin
Physicians’ roles in competency-based teaching: Do students recognize them?
title Physicians’ roles in competency-based teaching: Do students recognize them?
title_full Physicians’ roles in competency-based teaching: Do students recognize them?
title_fullStr Physicians’ roles in competency-based teaching: Do students recognize them?
title_full_unstemmed Physicians’ roles in competency-based teaching: Do students recognize them?
title_short Physicians’ roles in competency-based teaching: Do students recognize them?
title_sort physicians’ roles in competency-based teaching: do students recognize them?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6120155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30186947
http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma001183
work_keys_str_mv AT pippelelvira physiciansrolesincompetencybasedteachingdostudentsrecognizethem
AT narcißelisabeth physiciansrolesincompetencybasedteachingdostudentsrecognizethem
AT obertackeudo physiciansrolesincompetencybasedteachingdostudentsrecognizethem
AT strohmerrenate physiciansrolesincompetencybasedteachingdostudentsrecognizethem
AT schuttpelzbraunskatrin physiciansrolesincompetencybasedteachingdostudentsrecognizethem