Cargando…

Midlife contributors to socioeconomic differences in frailty during later life: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Health inequalities persist into old age. We aimed to investigate risk factors for socioeconomic differences in frailty that could potentially be modified through policy measures. METHODS: In this multi-wave longitudinal cohort study (Whitehall II study), we assessed participants' s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brunner, Eric J, Shipley, Martin J, Ahmadi-Abhari, Sara, Valencia Hernandez, Carlos, Abell, Jessica G, Singh-Manoux, Archana, Kawachi, Ichiro, Kivimaki, Mika
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier, Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6120440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29908857
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(18)30079-3
_version_ 1783352269207502848
author Brunner, Eric J
Shipley, Martin J
Ahmadi-Abhari, Sara
Valencia Hernandez, Carlos
Abell, Jessica G
Singh-Manoux, Archana
Kawachi, Ichiro
Kivimaki, Mika
author_facet Brunner, Eric J
Shipley, Martin J
Ahmadi-Abhari, Sara
Valencia Hernandez, Carlos
Abell, Jessica G
Singh-Manoux, Archana
Kawachi, Ichiro
Kivimaki, Mika
author_sort Brunner, Eric J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Health inequalities persist into old age. We aimed to investigate risk factors for socioeconomic differences in frailty that could potentially be modified through policy measures. METHODS: In this multi-wave longitudinal cohort study (Whitehall II study), we assessed participants' socioeconomic status, behavioural and biomedical risk factors, and disease status at age 45–55 years, and frailty (defined according to the Fried phenotype) at baseline and at one or more of three clinic visits about 18 years later (mean age 69 years [SD 5·9]). We used logistic mixed models to examine the associations between socioeconomic status and risk factors at age 50 years and subsequent prevalence of frailty (adjusted for sex, ethnic origin, and age), with sensitivity analyses and multiple imputation for missing data. FINDINGS: Between Sept 9, 2007, and Dec 8, 2016, 6233 middle-aged adults were measured for frailty. Frailty was present in 562 (3%) of 16 164 person-observations, and varied by socioeconomic status: 145 (2%) person-observations had high socioeconomic status, 241 (4%) had intermediate status, and 176 (7%) had low socioeconomic status, adjusting for sex and age. Risk factors for frailty included cardiovascular disease, depression, smoking, high or abstinent alcohol consumption, low fruit and vegetable consumption, physical inactivity, poor lung function, hypertension, and overweight or obesity. Cardiometabolic markers for future frailty were high ratio of total to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and raised interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein concentrations. The five most important factors contributing to the frailty gradient, assessed by percent attenuation of the association between socioeconomic status and frailty, were physical activity (13%), interleukin-6 (13%), body-mass index category (11%), C-reactive protein (11%), and poor lung function (10%). Overall, socioeconomic differences in frailty were reduced by 40% in the maximally-adjusted model compared with the minimally-adjusted model. INTERPRETATION: Behavioural and cardiometabolic risk factors in midlife account for more than a third of socioeconomic differences in frailty. Our findings suggest that interventions targeting physical activity, obesity, smoking, and low-grade inflammation in middle age might reduce socioeconomic differences in later-life frailty. FUNDING: British Heart Foundation and British Medical Research Council.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6120440
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61204402018-09-04 Midlife contributors to socioeconomic differences in frailty during later life: a prospective cohort study Brunner, Eric J Shipley, Martin J Ahmadi-Abhari, Sara Valencia Hernandez, Carlos Abell, Jessica G Singh-Manoux, Archana Kawachi, Ichiro Kivimaki, Mika Lancet Public Health Article BACKGROUND: Health inequalities persist into old age. We aimed to investigate risk factors for socioeconomic differences in frailty that could potentially be modified through policy measures. METHODS: In this multi-wave longitudinal cohort study (Whitehall II study), we assessed participants' socioeconomic status, behavioural and biomedical risk factors, and disease status at age 45–55 years, and frailty (defined according to the Fried phenotype) at baseline and at one or more of three clinic visits about 18 years later (mean age 69 years [SD 5·9]). We used logistic mixed models to examine the associations between socioeconomic status and risk factors at age 50 years and subsequent prevalence of frailty (adjusted for sex, ethnic origin, and age), with sensitivity analyses and multiple imputation for missing data. FINDINGS: Between Sept 9, 2007, and Dec 8, 2016, 6233 middle-aged adults were measured for frailty. Frailty was present in 562 (3%) of 16 164 person-observations, and varied by socioeconomic status: 145 (2%) person-observations had high socioeconomic status, 241 (4%) had intermediate status, and 176 (7%) had low socioeconomic status, adjusting for sex and age. Risk factors for frailty included cardiovascular disease, depression, smoking, high or abstinent alcohol consumption, low fruit and vegetable consumption, physical inactivity, poor lung function, hypertension, and overweight or obesity. Cardiometabolic markers for future frailty were high ratio of total to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and raised interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein concentrations. The five most important factors contributing to the frailty gradient, assessed by percent attenuation of the association between socioeconomic status and frailty, were physical activity (13%), interleukin-6 (13%), body-mass index category (11%), C-reactive protein (11%), and poor lung function (10%). Overall, socioeconomic differences in frailty were reduced by 40% in the maximally-adjusted model compared with the minimally-adjusted model. INTERPRETATION: Behavioural and cardiometabolic risk factors in midlife account for more than a third of socioeconomic differences in frailty. Our findings suggest that interventions targeting physical activity, obesity, smoking, and low-grade inflammation in middle age might reduce socioeconomic differences in later-life frailty. FUNDING: British Heart Foundation and British Medical Research Council. Elsevier, Ltd 2018-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6120440/ /pubmed/29908857 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(18)30079-3 Text en © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Brunner, Eric J
Shipley, Martin J
Ahmadi-Abhari, Sara
Valencia Hernandez, Carlos
Abell, Jessica G
Singh-Manoux, Archana
Kawachi, Ichiro
Kivimaki, Mika
Midlife contributors to socioeconomic differences in frailty during later life: a prospective cohort study
title Midlife contributors to socioeconomic differences in frailty during later life: a prospective cohort study
title_full Midlife contributors to socioeconomic differences in frailty during later life: a prospective cohort study
title_fullStr Midlife contributors to socioeconomic differences in frailty during later life: a prospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Midlife contributors to socioeconomic differences in frailty during later life: a prospective cohort study
title_short Midlife contributors to socioeconomic differences in frailty during later life: a prospective cohort study
title_sort midlife contributors to socioeconomic differences in frailty during later life: a prospective cohort study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6120440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29908857
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(18)30079-3
work_keys_str_mv AT brunnerericj midlifecontributorstosocioeconomicdifferencesinfrailtyduringlaterlifeaprospectivecohortstudy
AT shipleymartinj midlifecontributorstosocioeconomicdifferencesinfrailtyduringlaterlifeaprospectivecohortstudy
AT ahmadiabharisara midlifecontributorstosocioeconomicdifferencesinfrailtyduringlaterlifeaprospectivecohortstudy
AT valenciahernandezcarlos midlifecontributorstosocioeconomicdifferencesinfrailtyduringlaterlifeaprospectivecohortstudy
AT abelljessicag midlifecontributorstosocioeconomicdifferencesinfrailtyduringlaterlifeaprospectivecohortstudy
AT singhmanouxarchana midlifecontributorstosocioeconomicdifferencesinfrailtyduringlaterlifeaprospectivecohortstudy
AT kawachiichiro midlifecontributorstosocioeconomicdifferencesinfrailtyduringlaterlifeaprospectivecohortstudy
AT kivimakimika midlifecontributorstosocioeconomicdifferencesinfrailtyduringlaterlifeaprospectivecohortstudy