Cargando…

Comparison of MEMS switches and PIN diodes for switched dual tuned RF coils

PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of micro‐electromechanical systems (MEMS) switches against PIN diodes for switching a dual‐tuned RF coil between (19)F and (1)H resonant frequencies for multi‐nuclear lung imaging. METHODS: A four‐element fixed‐phase and amplitude transmit–receive RF coil was con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maunder, Adam, Rao, Madhwesha, Robb, Fraser, Wild, Jim M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6120476/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29524235
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27156
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of micro‐electromechanical systems (MEMS) switches against PIN diodes for switching a dual‐tuned RF coil between (19)F and (1)H resonant frequencies for multi‐nuclear lung imaging. METHODS: A four‐element fixed‐phase and amplitude transmit–receive RF coil was constructed to provide homogeneous excitation across the lungs, and to serve as a test system for various switching methods. The MR imaging and RF performance of the coil when switched between the (19)F and (1)H frequencies using MEMS switches, PIN diodes and hardwired configurations were compared. RESULTS: The performance of the coil with MEMS or PIN diode switching was comparable in terms of RF measurements, transmit efficiency and image SNR on both (19)F and (1)H nuclei. When the coil was not switched to the resonance frequency of the respective nucleus being imaged, reductions in the transmit efficiency were observed of 32% at the (19)F frequency and 12% at the (1)H frequency. The coil provides transmit field homogeneity of ±12.9% at the (1)H frequency and ±14.4% at the (19)F frequency in phantoms representing the thorax with the air space of the lungs filled with perfluoropropane gas. CONCLUSION: MEMS and PIN diodes were found to provide comparable performance in on‐state configuration, while MEMS were more robust in off‐state high‐powered operation (>1 kW), providing higher isolation and requiring a lower DC switching voltage than is needed for reverse biasing of PIN diodes. In addition, clear benefits of switching between the (19)F and (1)H resonances were demonstrated, despite the proximity of their Larmor frequencies.