Cargando…
Comparison of MEMS switches and PIN diodes for switched dual tuned RF coils
PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of micro‐electromechanical systems (MEMS) switches against PIN diodes for switching a dual‐tuned RF coil between (19)F and (1)H resonant frequencies for multi‐nuclear lung imaging. METHODS: A four‐element fixed‐phase and amplitude transmit–receive RF coil was con...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6120476/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29524235 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27156 |
_version_ | 1783352277710405632 |
---|---|
author | Maunder, Adam Rao, Madhwesha Robb, Fraser Wild, Jim M. |
author_facet | Maunder, Adam Rao, Madhwesha Robb, Fraser Wild, Jim M. |
author_sort | Maunder, Adam |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of micro‐electromechanical systems (MEMS) switches against PIN diodes for switching a dual‐tuned RF coil between (19)F and (1)H resonant frequencies for multi‐nuclear lung imaging. METHODS: A four‐element fixed‐phase and amplitude transmit–receive RF coil was constructed to provide homogeneous excitation across the lungs, and to serve as a test system for various switching methods. The MR imaging and RF performance of the coil when switched between the (19)F and (1)H frequencies using MEMS switches, PIN diodes and hardwired configurations were compared. RESULTS: The performance of the coil with MEMS or PIN diode switching was comparable in terms of RF measurements, transmit efficiency and image SNR on both (19)F and (1)H nuclei. When the coil was not switched to the resonance frequency of the respective nucleus being imaged, reductions in the transmit efficiency were observed of 32% at the (19)F frequency and 12% at the (1)H frequency. The coil provides transmit field homogeneity of ±12.9% at the (1)H frequency and ±14.4% at the (19)F frequency in phantoms representing the thorax with the air space of the lungs filled with perfluoropropane gas. CONCLUSION: MEMS and PIN diodes were found to provide comparable performance in on‐state configuration, while MEMS were more robust in off‐state high‐powered operation (>1 kW), providing higher isolation and requiring a lower DC switching voltage than is needed for reverse biasing of PIN diodes. In addition, clear benefits of switching between the (19)F and (1)H resonances were demonstrated, despite the proximity of their Larmor frequencies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6120476 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61204762018-09-05 Comparison of MEMS switches and PIN diodes for switched dual tuned RF coils Maunder, Adam Rao, Madhwesha Robb, Fraser Wild, Jim M. Magn Reson Med Notes—Hardware and Instrumentation PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of micro‐electromechanical systems (MEMS) switches against PIN diodes for switching a dual‐tuned RF coil between (19)F and (1)H resonant frequencies for multi‐nuclear lung imaging. METHODS: A four‐element fixed‐phase and amplitude transmit–receive RF coil was constructed to provide homogeneous excitation across the lungs, and to serve as a test system for various switching methods. The MR imaging and RF performance of the coil when switched between the (19)F and (1)H frequencies using MEMS switches, PIN diodes and hardwired configurations were compared. RESULTS: The performance of the coil with MEMS or PIN diode switching was comparable in terms of RF measurements, transmit efficiency and image SNR on both (19)F and (1)H nuclei. When the coil was not switched to the resonance frequency of the respective nucleus being imaged, reductions in the transmit efficiency were observed of 32% at the (19)F frequency and 12% at the (1)H frequency. The coil provides transmit field homogeneity of ±12.9% at the (1)H frequency and ±14.4% at the (19)F frequency in phantoms representing the thorax with the air space of the lungs filled with perfluoropropane gas. CONCLUSION: MEMS and PIN diodes were found to provide comparable performance in on‐state configuration, while MEMS were more robust in off‐state high‐powered operation (>1 kW), providing higher isolation and requiring a lower DC switching voltage than is needed for reverse biasing of PIN diodes. In addition, clear benefits of switching between the (19)F and (1)H resonances were demonstrated, despite the proximity of their Larmor frequencies. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-03-09 2018-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6120476/ /pubmed/29524235 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27156 Text en © 2018 The Authors Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Notes—Hardware and Instrumentation Maunder, Adam Rao, Madhwesha Robb, Fraser Wild, Jim M. Comparison of MEMS switches and PIN diodes for switched dual tuned RF coils |
title | Comparison of MEMS switches and PIN diodes for switched dual tuned RF coils |
title_full | Comparison of MEMS switches and PIN diodes for switched dual tuned RF coils |
title_fullStr | Comparison of MEMS switches and PIN diodes for switched dual tuned RF coils |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of MEMS switches and PIN diodes for switched dual tuned RF coils |
title_short | Comparison of MEMS switches and PIN diodes for switched dual tuned RF coils |
title_sort | comparison of mems switches and pin diodes for switched dual tuned rf coils |
topic | Notes—Hardware and Instrumentation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6120476/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29524235 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27156 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maunderadam comparisonofmemsswitchesandpindiodesforswitcheddualtunedrfcoils AT raomadhwesha comparisonofmemsswitchesandpindiodesforswitcheddualtunedrfcoils AT robbfraser comparisonofmemsswitchesandpindiodesforswitcheddualtunedrfcoils AT wildjimm comparisonofmemsswitchesandpindiodesforswitcheddualtunedrfcoils |