Cargando…

Comparison of MEMS switches and PIN diodes for switched dual tuned RF coils

PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of micro‐electromechanical systems (MEMS) switches against PIN diodes for switching a dual‐tuned RF coil between (19)F and (1)H resonant frequencies for multi‐nuclear lung imaging. METHODS: A four‐element fixed‐phase and amplitude transmit–receive RF coil was con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maunder, Adam, Rao, Madhwesha, Robb, Fraser, Wild, Jim M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6120476/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29524235
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27156
_version_ 1783352277710405632
author Maunder, Adam
Rao, Madhwesha
Robb, Fraser
Wild, Jim M.
author_facet Maunder, Adam
Rao, Madhwesha
Robb, Fraser
Wild, Jim M.
author_sort Maunder, Adam
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of micro‐electromechanical systems (MEMS) switches against PIN diodes for switching a dual‐tuned RF coil between (19)F and (1)H resonant frequencies for multi‐nuclear lung imaging. METHODS: A four‐element fixed‐phase and amplitude transmit–receive RF coil was constructed to provide homogeneous excitation across the lungs, and to serve as a test system for various switching methods. The MR imaging and RF performance of the coil when switched between the (19)F and (1)H frequencies using MEMS switches, PIN diodes and hardwired configurations were compared. RESULTS: The performance of the coil with MEMS or PIN diode switching was comparable in terms of RF measurements, transmit efficiency and image SNR on both (19)F and (1)H nuclei. When the coil was not switched to the resonance frequency of the respective nucleus being imaged, reductions in the transmit efficiency were observed of 32% at the (19)F frequency and 12% at the (1)H frequency. The coil provides transmit field homogeneity of ±12.9% at the (1)H frequency and ±14.4% at the (19)F frequency in phantoms representing the thorax with the air space of the lungs filled with perfluoropropane gas. CONCLUSION: MEMS and PIN diodes were found to provide comparable performance in on‐state configuration, while MEMS were more robust in off‐state high‐powered operation (>1 kW), providing higher isolation and requiring a lower DC switching voltage than is needed for reverse biasing of PIN diodes. In addition, clear benefits of switching between the (19)F and (1)H resonances were demonstrated, despite the proximity of their Larmor frequencies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6120476
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61204762018-09-05 Comparison of MEMS switches and PIN diodes for switched dual tuned RF coils Maunder, Adam Rao, Madhwesha Robb, Fraser Wild, Jim M. Magn Reson Med Notes—Hardware and Instrumentation PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of micro‐electromechanical systems (MEMS) switches against PIN diodes for switching a dual‐tuned RF coil between (19)F and (1)H resonant frequencies for multi‐nuclear lung imaging. METHODS: A four‐element fixed‐phase and amplitude transmit–receive RF coil was constructed to provide homogeneous excitation across the lungs, and to serve as a test system for various switching methods. The MR imaging and RF performance of the coil when switched between the (19)F and (1)H frequencies using MEMS switches, PIN diodes and hardwired configurations were compared. RESULTS: The performance of the coil with MEMS or PIN diode switching was comparable in terms of RF measurements, transmit efficiency and image SNR on both (19)F and (1)H nuclei. When the coil was not switched to the resonance frequency of the respective nucleus being imaged, reductions in the transmit efficiency were observed of 32% at the (19)F frequency and 12% at the (1)H frequency. The coil provides transmit field homogeneity of ±12.9% at the (1)H frequency and ±14.4% at the (19)F frequency in phantoms representing the thorax with the air space of the lungs filled with perfluoropropane gas. CONCLUSION: MEMS and PIN diodes were found to provide comparable performance in on‐state configuration, while MEMS were more robust in off‐state high‐powered operation (>1 kW), providing higher isolation and requiring a lower DC switching voltage than is needed for reverse biasing of PIN diodes. In addition, clear benefits of switching between the (19)F and (1)H resonances were demonstrated, despite the proximity of their Larmor frequencies. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-03-09 2018-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6120476/ /pubmed/29524235 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27156 Text en © 2018 The Authors Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Notes—Hardware and Instrumentation
Maunder, Adam
Rao, Madhwesha
Robb, Fraser
Wild, Jim M.
Comparison of MEMS switches and PIN diodes for switched dual tuned RF coils
title Comparison of MEMS switches and PIN diodes for switched dual tuned RF coils
title_full Comparison of MEMS switches and PIN diodes for switched dual tuned RF coils
title_fullStr Comparison of MEMS switches and PIN diodes for switched dual tuned RF coils
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of MEMS switches and PIN diodes for switched dual tuned RF coils
title_short Comparison of MEMS switches and PIN diodes for switched dual tuned RF coils
title_sort comparison of mems switches and pin diodes for switched dual tuned rf coils
topic Notes—Hardware and Instrumentation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6120476/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29524235
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27156
work_keys_str_mv AT maunderadam comparisonofmemsswitchesandpindiodesforswitcheddualtunedrfcoils
AT raomadhwesha comparisonofmemsswitchesandpindiodesforswitcheddualtunedrfcoils
AT robbfraser comparisonofmemsswitchesandpindiodesforswitcheddualtunedrfcoils
AT wildjimm comparisonofmemsswitchesandpindiodesforswitcheddualtunedrfcoils