Cargando…

Coping behavior in multiple sclerosis—complementary and alternative medicine: A cross‐sectional study

MAIN PROBLEM: Treatment options for multiple sclerosis (MS) have enlarged tremendously over the last years. Nonetheless, lots of patients look for alternative treatment options. The use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is widespread in MS, however, its scientific investigation is limi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rommer, Paulus S, König, Nicolaus, Sühnel, Annett, Zettl, Uwe K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6120478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29635832
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cns.12857
_version_ 1783352278177021952
author Rommer, Paulus S
König, Nicolaus
Sühnel, Annett
Zettl, Uwe K
author_facet Rommer, Paulus S
König, Nicolaus
Sühnel, Annett
Zettl, Uwe K
author_sort Rommer, Paulus S
collection PubMed
description MAIN PROBLEM: Treatment options for multiple sclerosis (MS) have enlarged tremendously over the last years. Nonetheless, lots of patients look for alternative treatment options. The use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is widespread in MS, however, its scientific investigation is limited so far. The aim of the study is to analyse clinical and demographical differences of MS patients in dependency of their CAM utilization as coping strategy. METHODS: A total of 254 patients with a clinically definite MS were examined in a semistructured interview. Additional standardized questionnaires were used to measure different aspects of coping with illness. All patients underwent neurological examination. RESULTS: About 206 of all enrolled patients are CAM users (81.1%). They have a longer disease duration (8.3 years vs 7.3 years, P = 0.028) and show higher disability (median EDSS 4.0 vs 2.0, P < 0.001) than nonusers. CAM users differed significantly from nonusers in their coping behavior (P = 0.035). Users are brooding more heavily over the disease, looking for more information about MS, and are looking for a sense of their disease in religion more often than nonusers. CAM users are at a higher risk of depression. Almost two‐thirds of CAM users (57.6%) reported positive effects on the well‐being of their state of health. CONCLUSION: Coping behavior differs significantly between CAM users and nonusers. CAM utilization is associated with higher disability and depression. More than 80% of our cohort has used alternative or complementary methods. CAM utilization may mirror unmet needs in the treatment of MS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6120478
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61204782018-09-05 Coping behavior in multiple sclerosis—complementary and alternative medicine: A cross‐sectional study Rommer, Paulus S König, Nicolaus Sühnel, Annett Zettl, Uwe K CNS Neurosci Ther Original Articles MAIN PROBLEM: Treatment options for multiple sclerosis (MS) have enlarged tremendously over the last years. Nonetheless, lots of patients look for alternative treatment options. The use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is widespread in MS, however, its scientific investigation is limited so far. The aim of the study is to analyse clinical and demographical differences of MS patients in dependency of their CAM utilization as coping strategy. METHODS: A total of 254 patients with a clinically definite MS were examined in a semistructured interview. Additional standardized questionnaires were used to measure different aspects of coping with illness. All patients underwent neurological examination. RESULTS: About 206 of all enrolled patients are CAM users (81.1%). They have a longer disease duration (8.3 years vs 7.3 years, P = 0.028) and show higher disability (median EDSS 4.0 vs 2.0, P < 0.001) than nonusers. CAM users differed significantly from nonusers in their coping behavior (P = 0.035). Users are brooding more heavily over the disease, looking for more information about MS, and are looking for a sense of their disease in religion more often than nonusers. CAM users are at a higher risk of depression. Almost two‐thirds of CAM users (57.6%) reported positive effects on the well‐being of their state of health. CONCLUSION: Coping behavior differs significantly between CAM users and nonusers. CAM utilization is associated with higher disability and depression. More than 80% of our cohort has used alternative or complementary methods. CAM utilization may mirror unmet needs in the treatment of MS. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6120478/ /pubmed/29635832 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cns.12857 Text en © 2018 The Authors. CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Rommer, Paulus S
König, Nicolaus
Sühnel, Annett
Zettl, Uwe K
Coping behavior in multiple sclerosis—complementary and alternative medicine: A cross‐sectional study
title Coping behavior in multiple sclerosis—complementary and alternative medicine: A cross‐sectional study
title_full Coping behavior in multiple sclerosis—complementary and alternative medicine: A cross‐sectional study
title_fullStr Coping behavior in multiple sclerosis—complementary and alternative medicine: A cross‐sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Coping behavior in multiple sclerosis—complementary and alternative medicine: A cross‐sectional study
title_short Coping behavior in multiple sclerosis—complementary and alternative medicine: A cross‐sectional study
title_sort coping behavior in multiple sclerosis—complementary and alternative medicine: a cross‐sectional study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6120478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29635832
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cns.12857
work_keys_str_mv AT rommerpauluss copingbehaviorinmultiplesclerosiscomplementaryandalternativemedicineacrosssectionalstudy
AT konignicolaus copingbehaviorinmultiplesclerosiscomplementaryandalternativemedicineacrosssectionalstudy
AT suhnelannett copingbehaviorinmultiplesclerosiscomplementaryandalternativemedicineacrosssectionalstudy
AT zettluwek copingbehaviorinmultiplesclerosiscomplementaryandalternativemedicineacrosssectionalstudy