Cargando…
Which limb is it? Responses to vibrotactile stimulation in early infancy
This study focuses on how the body schema develops during the first months of life, by investigating infants’ motor responses to localized vibrotactile stimulation on their limbs. Vibrotactile stimulation was provided by small buzzers that were attached to the infants’ four limbs one at a time. Four...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6120485/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29226463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12224 |
_version_ | 1783352279837966336 |
---|---|
author | Somogyi, Eszter Jacquey, Lisa Heed, Tobias Hoffmann, Matej Lockman, Jeffrey J. Granjon, Lionel Fagard, Jacqueline O'Regan, J. Kevin |
author_facet | Somogyi, Eszter Jacquey, Lisa Heed, Tobias Hoffmann, Matej Lockman, Jeffrey J. Granjon, Lionel Fagard, Jacqueline O'Regan, J. Kevin |
author_sort | Somogyi, Eszter |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study focuses on how the body schema develops during the first months of life, by investigating infants’ motor responses to localized vibrotactile stimulation on their limbs. Vibrotactile stimulation was provided by small buzzers that were attached to the infants’ four limbs one at a time. Four age groups were compared cross‐sectionally (3‐, 4‐, 5‐, and 6‐month‐olds). We show that before they actually reach for the buzzer, which, according to previous studies, occurs around 7–8 months of age, infants demonstrate emerging knowledge about their body's configuration by producing specific movement patterns associated with the stimulated body area. At 3 months, infants responded with an increase in general activity when the buzzer was placed on the body, independently of the vibrator's location. Differentiated topographical awareness of the body seemed to appear around 5 months, with specific responses resulting from stimulation of the hands emerging first, followed by the differentiation of movement patterns associated with the stimulation of the feet. Qualitative analyses revealed specific movement types reliably associated with each stimulated location by 6 months of age, possibly preparing infants’ ability to actually reach for the vibrating target. We discuss this result in relation to newborns’ ability to learn specific movement patterns through intersensory contingency. STATEMENT OF CONTRIBUTION: what is already known on infants’ sensorimotor knowledge about their own bodies 3‐month‐olds readily learn to produce specific limb movements to obtain a desired effect (movement of a mobile). infants detect temporal and spatial correspondences between events involving their own body and visual events. what the present study adds until 4–5 months of age, infants mostly produce general motor responses to localized touch. this is because in the present study, infants could not rely on immediate contingent feedback. we propose a cephalocaudal developmental trend of topographic differentiation of body areas. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6120485 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61204852018-09-05 Which limb is it? Responses to vibrotactile stimulation in early infancy Somogyi, Eszter Jacquey, Lisa Heed, Tobias Hoffmann, Matej Lockman, Jeffrey J. Granjon, Lionel Fagard, Jacqueline O'Regan, J. Kevin Br J Dev Psychol Original Articles This study focuses on how the body schema develops during the first months of life, by investigating infants’ motor responses to localized vibrotactile stimulation on their limbs. Vibrotactile stimulation was provided by small buzzers that were attached to the infants’ four limbs one at a time. Four age groups were compared cross‐sectionally (3‐, 4‐, 5‐, and 6‐month‐olds). We show that before they actually reach for the buzzer, which, according to previous studies, occurs around 7–8 months of age, infants demonstrate emerging knowledge about their body's configuration by producing specific movement patterns associated with the stimulated body area. At 3 months, infants responded with an increase in general activity when the buzzer was placed on the body, independently of the vibrator's location. Differentiated topographical awareness of the body seemed to appear around 5 months, with specific responses resulting from stimulation of the hands emerging first, followed by the differentiation of movement patterns associated with the stimulation of the feet. Qualitative analyses revealed specific movement types reliably associated with each stimulated location by 6 months of age, possibly preparing infants’ ability to actually reach for the vibrating target. We discuss this result in relation to newborns’ ability to learn specific movement patterns through intersensory contingency. STATEMENT OF CONTRIBUTION: what is already known on infants’ sensorimotor knowledge about their own bodies 3‐month‐olds readily learn to produce specific limb movements to obtain a desired effect (movement of a mobile). infants detect temporal and spatial correspondences between events involving their own body and visual events. what the present study adds until 4–5 months of age, infants mostly produce general motor responses to localized touch. this is because in the present study, infants could not rely on immediate contingent feedback. we propose a cephalocaudal developmental trend of topographic differentiation of body areas. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-12-11 2018-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6120485/ /pubmed/29226463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12224 Text en © 2017 The Authors British Journal of Developmental Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Psychological Society This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Somogyi, Eszter Jacquey, Lisa Heed, Tobias Hoffmann, Matej Lockman, Jeffrey J. Granjon, Lionel Fagard, Jacqueline O'Regan, J. Kevin Which limb is it? Responses to vibrotactile stimulation in early infancy |
title | Which limb is it? Responses to vibrotactile stimulation in early infancy |
title_full | Which limb is it? Responses to vibrotactile stimulation in early infancy |
title_fullStr | Which limb is it? Responses to vibrotactile stimulation in early infancy |
title_full_unstemmed | Which limb is it? Responses to vibrotactile stimulation in early infancy |
title_short | Which limb is it? Responses to vibrotactile stimulation in early infancy |
title_sort | which limb is it? responses to vibrotactile stimulation in early infancy |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6120485/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29226463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12224 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT somogyieszter whichlimbisitresponsestovibrotactilestimulationinearlyinfancy AT jacqueylisa whichlimbisitresponsestovibrotactilestimulationinearlyinfancy AT heedtobias whichlimbisitresponsestovibrotactilestimulationinearlyinfancy AT hoffmannmatej whichlimbisitresponsestovibrotactilestimulationinearlyinfancy AT lockmanjeffreyj whichlimbisitresponsestovibrotactilestimulationinearlyinfancy AT granjonlionel whichlimbisitresponsestovibrotactilestimulationinearlyinfancy AT fagardjacqueline whichlimbisitresponsestovibrotactilestimulationinearlyinfancy AT oreganjkevin whichlimbisitresponsestovibrotactilestimulationinearlyinfancy |