Cargando…

Which limb is it? Responses to vibrotactile stimulation in early infancy

This study focuses on how the body schema develops during the first months of life, by investigating infants’ motor responses to localized vibrotactile stimulation on their limbs. Vibrotactile stimulation was provided by small buzzers that were attached to the infants’ four limbs one at a time. Four...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Somogyi, Eszter, Jacquey, Lisa, Heed, Tobias, Hoffmann, Matej, Lockman, Jeffrey J., Granjon, Lionel, Fagard, Jacqueline, O'Regan, J. Kevin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6120485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29226463
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12224
_version_ 1783352279837966336
author Somogyi, Eszter
Jacquey, Lisa
Heed, Tobias
Hoffmann, Matej
Lockman, Jeffrey J.
Granjon, Lionel
Fagard, Jacqueline
O'Regan, J. Kevin
author_facet Somogyi, Eszter
Jacquey, Lisa
Heed, Tobias
Hoffmann, Matej
Lockman, Jeffrey J.
Granjon, Lionel
Fagard, Jacqueline
O'Regan, J. Kevin
author_sort Somogyi, Eszter
collection PubMed
description This study focuses on how the body schema develops during the first months of life, by investigating infants’ motor responses to localized vibrotactile stimulation on their limbs. Vibrotactile stimulation was provided by small buzzers that were attached to the infants’ four limbs one at a time. Four age groups were compared cross‐sectionally (3‐, 4‐, 5‐, and 6‐month‐olds). We show that before they actually reach for the buzzer, which, according to previous studies, occurs around 7–8 months of age, infants demonstrate emerging knowledge about their body's configuration by producing specific movement patterns associated with the stimulated body area. At 3 months, infants responded with an increase in general activity when the buzzer was placed on the body, independently of the vibrator's location. Differentiated topographical awareness of the body seemed to appear around 5 months, with specific responses resulting from stimulation of the hands emerging first, followed by the differentiation of movement patterns associated with the stimulation of the feet. Qualitative analyses revealed specific movement types reliably associated with each stimulated location by 6 months of age, possibly preparing infants’ ability to actually reach for the vibrating target. We discuss this result in relation to newborns’ ability to learn specific movement patterns through intersensory contingency. STATEMENT OF CONTRIBUTION: what is already known on infants’ sensorimotor knowledge about their own bodies 3‐month‐olds readily learn to produce specific limb movements to obtain a desired effect (movement of a mobile). infants detect temporal and spatial correspondences between events involving their own body and visual events. what the present study adds until 4–5 months of age, infants mostly produce general motor responses to localized touch. this is because in the present study, infants could not rely on immediate contingent feedback. we propose a cephalocaudal developmental trend of topographic differentiation of body areas.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6120485
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61204852018-09-05 Which limb is it? Responses to vibrotactile stimulation in early infancy Somogyi, Eszter Jacquey, Lisa Heed, Tobias Hoffmann, Matej Lockman, Jeffrey J. Granjon, Lionel Fagard, Jacqueline O'Regan, J. Kevin Br J Dev Psychol Original Articles This study focuses on how the body schema develops during the first months of life, by investigating infants’ motor responses to localized vibrotactile stimulation on their limbs. Vibrotactile stimulation was provided by small buzzers that were attached to the infants’ four limbs one at a time. Four age groups were compared cross‐sectionally (3‐, 4‐, 5‐, and 6‐month‐olds). We show that before they actually reach for the buzzer, which, according to previous studies, occurs around 7–8 months of age, infants demonstrate emerging knowledge about their body's configuration by producing specific movement patterns associated with the stimulated body area. At 3 months, infants responded with an increase in general activity when the buzzer was placed on the body, independently of the vibrator's location. Differentiated topographical awareness of the body seemed to appear around 5 months, with specific responses resulting from stimulation of the hands emerging first, followed by the differentiation of movement patterns associated with the stimulation of the feet. Qualitative analyses revealed specific movement types reliably associated with each stimulated location by 6 months of age, possibly preparing infants’ ability to actually reach for the vibrating target. We discuss this result in relation to newborns’ ability to learn specific movement patterns through intersensory contingency. STATEMENT OF CONTRIBUTION: what is already known on infants’ sensorimotor knowledge about their own bodies 3‐month‐olds readily learn to produce specific limb movements to obtain a desired effect (movement of a mobile). infants detect temporal and spatial correspondences between events involving their own body and visual events. what the present study adds until 4–5 months of age, infants mostly produce general motor responses to localized touch. this is because in the present study, infants could not rely on immediate contingent feedback. we propose a cephalocaudal developmental trend of topographic differentiation of body areas. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-12-11 2018-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6120485/ /pubmed/29226463 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12224 Text en © 2017 The Authors British Journal of Developmental Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Psychological Society This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Somogyi, Eszter
Jacquey, Lisa
Heed, Tobias
Hoffmann, Matej
Lockman, Jeffrey J.
Granjon, Lionel
Fagard, Jacqueline
O'Regan, J. Kevin
Which limb is it? Responses to vibrotactile stimulation in early infancy
title Which limb is it? Responses to vibrotactile stimulation in early infancy
title_full Which limb is it? Responses to vibrotactile stimulation in early infancy
title_fullStr Which limb is it? Responses to vibrotactile stimulation in early infancy
title_full_unstemmed Which limb is it? Responses to vibrotactile stimulation in early infancy
title_short Which limb is it? Responses to vibrotactile stimulation in early infancy
title_sort which limb is it? responses to vibrotactile stimulation in early infancy
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6120485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29226463
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12224
work_keys_str_mv AT somogyieszter whichlimbisitresponsestovibrotactilestimulationinearlyinfancy
AT jacqueylisa whichlimbisitresponsestovibrotactilestimulationinearlyinfancy
AT heedtobias whichlimbisitresponsestovibrotactilestimulationinearlyinfancy
AT hoffmannmatej whichlimbisitresponsestovibrotactilestimulationinearlyinfancy
AT lockmanjeffreyj whichlimbisitresponsestovibrotactilestimulationinearlyinfancy
AT granjonlionel whichlimbisitresponsestovibrotactilestimulationinearlyinfancy
AT fagardjacqueline whichlimbisitresponsestovibrotactilestimulationinearlyinfancy
AT oreganjkevin whichlimbisitresponsestovibrotactilestimulationinearlyinfancy