Cargando…
Framework for life cycle assessment of livestock production systems to account for the nutritional quality of final products
Life cycle assessment (LCA) is widely regarded as a useful tool for comparing the environmental impacts of multiple livestock production systems. While LCA results are typically communicated in the form of environmental burdens per mass unit of the end product, it is increasingly becoming recognized...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6120525/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30197782 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fes3.143 |
_version_ | 1783352289132544000 |
---|---|
author | McAuliffe, Graham A. Takahashi, Taro Lee, Michael R. F. |
author_facet | McAuliffe, Graham A. Takahashi, Taro Lee, Michael R. F. |
author_sort | McAuliffe, Graham A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Life cycle assessment (LCA) is widely regarded as a useful tool for comparing the environmental impacts of multiple livestock production systems. While LCA results are typically communicated in the form of environmental burdens per mass unit of the end product, it is increasingly becoming recognized that the product quality also needs to be accounted for to truly understand the value of a farming system to society. To date, a number of studies have examined environmental consequences of different food consumption patterns at the diet level; however, few have addressed nutritional variations of a single commodity attributable to production systems, leaving limited insight into how on‐farm practices can be improved to better balance environment and human nutrition. Using data from seven livestock production systems encompassing cattle, sheep, pigs, and poultry, this paper proposes a novel framework to incorporate nutritional value of meat products into livestock LCA. The results of quantitative case studies demonstrate that relative emissions intensities associated with different systems can be dramatically altered when the nutrient content of meat replaces the mass of meat as the functional unit, with cattle systems outperforming pig and poultry systems in some cases. This finding suggests that the performance of livestock systems should be evaluated under a whole supply chain approach, whereby end products originating from different farm management strategies are treated as competing but separate commodities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6120525 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61205252018-09-05 Framework for life cycle assessment of livestock production systems to account for the nutritional quality of final products McAuliffe, Graham A. Takahashi, Taro Lee, Michael R. F. Food Energy Secur Editor's Choice and Original Research Life cycle assessment (LCA) is widely regarded as a useful tool for comparing the environmental impacts of multiple livestock production systems. While LCA results are typically communicated in the form of environmental burdens per mass unit of the end product, it is increasingly becoming recognized that the product quality also needs to be accounted for to truly understand the value of a farming system to society. To date, a number of studies have examined environmental consequences of different food consumption patterns at the diet level; however, few have addressed nutritional variations of a single commodity attributable to production systems, leaving limited insight into how on‐farm practices can be improved to better balance environment and human nutrition. Using data from seven livestock production systems encompassing cattle, sheep, pigs, and poultry, this paper proposes a novel framework to incorporate nutritional value of meat products into livestock LCA. The results of quantitative case studies demonstrate that relative emissions intensities associated with different systems can be dramatically altered when the nutrient content of meat replaces the mass of meat as the functional unit, with cattle systems outperforming pig and poultry systems in some cases. This finding suggests that the performance of livestock systems should be evaluated under a whole supply chain approach, whereby end products originating from different farm management strategies are treated as competing but separate commodities. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-08-01 2018-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6120525/ /pubmed/30197782 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fes3.143 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Food and Energy Security published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. and the Association of Applied Biologists. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Editor's Choice and Original Research McAuliffe, Graham A. Takahashi, Taro Lee, Michael R. F. Framework for life cycle assessment of livestock production systems to account for the nutritional quality of final products |
title | Framework for life cycle assessment of livestock production systems to account for the nutritional quality of final products |
title_full | Framework for life cycle assessment of livestock production systems to account for the nutritional quality of final products |
title_fullStr | Framework for life cycle assessment of livestock production systems to account for the nutritional quality of final products |
title_full_unstemmed | Framework for life cycle assessment of livestock production systems to account for the nutritional quality of final products |
title_short | Framework for life cycle assessment of livestock production systems to account for the nutritional quality of final products |
title_sort | framework for life cycle assessment of livestock production systems to account for the nutritional quality of final products |
topic | Editor's Choice and Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6120525/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30197782 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fes3.143 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcauliffegrahama frameworkforlifecycleassessmentoflivestockproductionsystemstoaccountforthenutritionalqualityoffinalproducts AT takahashitaro frameworkforlifecycleassessmentoflivestockproductionsystemstoaccountforthenutritionalqualityoffinalproducts AT leemichaelrf frameworkforlifecycleassessmentoflivestockproductionsystemstoaccountforthenutritionalqualityoffinalproducts |