Cargando…

Framework for life cycle assessment of livestock production systems to account for the nutritional quality of final products

Life cycle assessment (LCA) is widely regarded as a useful tool for comparing the environmental impacts of multiple livestock production systems. While LCA results are typically communicated in the form of environmental burdens per mass unit of the end product, it is increasingly becoming recognized...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McAuliffe, Graham A., Takahashi, Taro, Lee, Michael R. F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6120525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30197782
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fes3.143
_version_ 1783352289132544000
author McAuliffe, Graham A.
Takahashi, Taro
Lee, Michael R. F.
author_facet McAuliffe, Graham A.
Takahashi, Taro
Lee, Michael R. F.
author_sort McAuliffe, Graham A.
collection PubMed
description Life cycle assessment (LCA) is widely regarded as a useful tool for comparing the environmental impacts of multiple livestock production systems. While LCA results are typically communicated in the form of environmental burdens per mass unit of the end product, it is increasingly becoming recognized that the product quality also needs to be accounted for to truly understand the value of a farming system to society. To date, a number of studies have examined environmental consequences of different food consumption patterns at the diet level; however, few have addressed nutritional variations of a single commodity attributable to production systems, leaving limited insight into how on‐farm practices can be improved to better balance environment and human nutrition. Using data from seven livestock production systems encompassing cattle, sheep, pigs, and poultry, this paper proposes a novel framework to incorporate nutritional value of meat products into livestock LCA. The results of quantitative case studies demonstrate that relative emissions intensities associated with different systems can be dramatically altered when the nutrient content of meat replaces the mass of meat as the functional unit, with cattle systems outperforming pig and poultry systems in some cases. This finding suggests that the performance of livestock systems should be evaluated under a whole supply chain approach, whereby end products originating from different farm management strategies are treated as competing but separate commodities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6120525
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61205252018-09-05 Framework for life cycle assessment of livestock production systems to account for the nutritional quality of final products McAuliffe, Graham A. Takahashi, Taro Lee, Michael R. F. Food Energy Secur Editor's Choice and Original Research Life cycle assessment (LCA) is widely regarded as a useful tool for comparing the environmental impacts of multiple livestock production systems. While LCA results are typically communicated in the form of environmental burdens per mass unit of the end product, it is increasingly becoming recognized that the product quality also needs to be accounted for to truly understand the value of a farming system to society. To date, a number of studies have examined environmental consequences of different food consumption patterns at the diet level; however, few have addressed nutritional variations of a single commodity attributable to production systems, leaving limited insight into how on‐farm practices can be improved to better balance environment and human nutrition. Using data from seven livestock production systems encompassing cattle, sheep, pigs, and poultry, this paper proposes a novel framework to incorporate nutritional value of meat products into livestock LCA. The results of quantitative case studies demonstrate that relative emissions intensities associated with different systems can be dramatically altered when the nutrient content of meat replaces the mass of meat as the functional unit, with cattle systems outperforming pig and poultry systems in some cases. This finding suggests that the performance of livestock systems should be evaluated under a whole supply chain approach, whereby end products originating from different farm management strategies are treated as competing but separate commodities. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-08-01 2018-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6120525/ /pubmed/30197782 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fes3.143 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Food and Energy Security published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. and the Association of Applied Biologists. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Editor's Choice and Original Research
McAuliffe, Graham A.
Takahashi, Taro
Lee, Michael R. F.
Framework for life cycle assessment of livestock production systems to account for the nutritional quality of final products
title Framework for life cycle assessment of livestock production systems to account for the nutritional quality of final products
title_full Framework for life cycle assessment of livestock production systems to account for the nutritional quality of final products
title_fullStr Framework for life cycle assessment of livestock production systems to account for the nutritional quality of final products
title_full_unstemmed Framework for life cycle assessment of livestock production systems to account for the nutritional quality of final products
title_short Framework for life cycle assessment of livestock production systems to account for the nutritional quality of final products
title_sort framework for life cycle assessment of livestock production systems to account for the nutritional quality of final products
topic Editor's Choice and Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6120525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30197782
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fes3.143
work_keys_str_mv AT mcauliffegrahama frameworkforlifecycleassessmentoflivestockproductionsystemstoaccountforthenutritionalqualityoffinalproducts
AT takahashitaro frameworkforlifecycleassessmentoflivestockproductionsystemstoaccountforthenutritionalqualityoffinalproducts
AT leemichaelrf frameworkforlifecycleassessmentoflivestockproductionsystemstoaccountforthenutritionalqualityoffinalproducts