Cargando…

Safety, tolerability, and efficacy evaluation of the SlimME device for circumference reduction

OBJECTIVE: To assess the short‐ and long‐term thermal impact of subclinical and clinical regimens of a single, non‐invasive uniform ultrasound treatment session on subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, open‐label, single‐arm, split‐side study. METHODS: Patients (n = 17) were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Ferrando, Giovanni
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6120542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29411402
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lsm.22796
_version_ 1783352293197873152
author Ferrando, Giovanni
author_facet Ferrando, Giovanni
author_sort Ferrando, Giovanni
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the short‐ and long‐term thermal impact of subclinical and clinical regimens of a single, non‐invasive uniform ultrasound treatment session on subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, open‐label, single‐arm, split‐side study. METHODS: Patients (n = 17) were subjected to uniform ultrasound treatment, delivered in a single session with the SlimME device. The device was set to one of four treatment regimens, which differed in their durations and energy fluences during the raise and maintenance phases. Up to six abdominal regions were treated, with six patients receiving a different treatment on each side of the abdomen. Safety was assessed by measuring skin surface temperature, evaluating expected skin responses immediately and 30 min after treatment and via patient ratings of pain and discomfort. Efficacy of raising and then maintaining SAT temperatures at 48°C, was determined by routinely measuring SAT temperatures during the treatment session and by histological analysis of samples collected 7 (n = 13) or 90 (n = 4) days after treatment. RESULTS: Trace to mild erythema was observed in up to 48% of the treated zones, which, in most cases, resolved within 30 minutes. No significant rise in mean skin surface temperature (≤26.5°C) was recorded following any of the four tested regimens. Overall, patients reported tolerability to treatment, with the highest mean pain score registered for the moderate and high intensity regimens (4.4 ± 1.5 and 4.9 ± 1.4, respectively). Mean SAT temperatures did not exceed 48.4 ± 2.5°C and were effectively maintained throughout the maintenance phase of the treatment session. Low‐energy fluence led to localized fat coagulative necrotic lesions, surrounded by subacute rim of inflammation, while high‐energy fluence induced fat coagulative necrosis alongside granulomatous panniculitis, which resolved within 90 days. CONCLUSION: The tested uniform ultrasound regimens elicited SAT temperature elevations, with a subsequent energy‐dependent increase in degree of fat necrosis. At the same time, the unique design spared the surrounding tissue from thermal damage and was associated with minimal discomfort. Taken together, the SlimME device constitutes an effective tool for destruction of stubborn hypodermal fat deposits. Lasers Surg. Med. 50:745–754, 2018. © 2018 The Authors. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6120542
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61205422018-09-05 Safety, tolerability, and efficacy evaluation of the SlimME device for circumference reduction Ferrando, Giovanni Lasers Surg Med Clinical Reports OBJECTIVE: To assess the short‐ and long‐term thermal impact of subclinical and clinical regimens of a single, non‐invasive uniform ultrasound treatment session on subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, open‐label, single‐arm, split‐side study. METHODS: Patients (n = 17) were subjected to uniform ultrasound treatment, delivered in a single session with the SlimME device. The device was set to one of four treatment regimens, which differed in their durations and energy fluences during the raise and maintenance phases. Up to six abdominal regions were treated, with six patients receiving a different treatment on each side of the abdomen. Safety was assessed by measuring skin surface temperature, evaluating expected skin responses immediately and 30 min after treatment and via patient ratings of pain and discomfort. Efficacy of raising and then maintaining SAT temperatures at 48°C, was determined by routinely measuring SAT temperatures during the treatment session and by histological analysis of samples collected 7 (n = 13) or 90 (n = 4) days after treatment. RESULTS: Trace to mild erythema was observed in up to 48% of the treated zones, which, in most cases, resolved within 30 minutes. No significant rise in mean skin surface temperature (≤26.5°C) was recorded following any of the four tested regimens. Overall, patients reported tolerability to treatment, with the highest mean pain score registered for the moderate and high intensity regimens (4.4 ± 1.5 and 4.9 ± 1.4, respectively). Mean SAT temperatures did not exceed 48.4 ± 2.5°C and were effectively maintained throughout the maintenance phase of the treatment session. Low‐energy fluence led to localized fat coagulative necrotic lesions, surrounded by subacute rim of inflammation, while high‐energy fluence induced fat coagulative necrosis alongside granulomatous panniculitis, which resolved within 90 days. CONCLUSION: The tested uniform ultrasound regimens elicited SAT temperature elevations, with a subsequent energy‐dependent increase in degree of fat necrosis. At the same time, the unique design spared the surrounding tissue from thermal damage and was associated with minimal discomfort. Taken together, the SlimME device constitutes an effective tool for destruction of stubborn hypodermal fat deposits. Lasers Surg. Med. 50:745–754, 2018. © 2018 The Authors. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-02-07 2018-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6120542/ /pubmed/29411402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lsm.22796 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Clinical Reports
Ferrando, Giovanni
Safety, tolerability, and efficacy evaluation of the SlimME device for circumference reduction
title Safety, tolerability, and efficacy evaluation of the SlimME device for circumference reduction
title_full Safety, tolerability, and efficacy evaluation of the SlimME device for circumference reduction
title_fullStr Safety, tolerability, and efficacy evaluation of the SlimME device for circumference reduction
title_full_unstemmed Safety, tolerability, and efficacy evaluation of the SlimME device for circumference reduction
title_short Safety, tolerability, and efficacy evaluation of the SlimME device for circumference reduction
title_sort safety, tolerability, and efficacy evaluation of the slimme device for circumference reduction
topic Clinical Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6120542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29411402
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lsm.22796
work_keys_str_mv AT ferrandogiovanni safetytolerabilityandefficacyevaluationoftheslimmedeviceforcircumferencereduction