Cargando…

What constitutes ‘good practice’ in early intervention for psychosis? Analysis of clinical guidelines

BACKGROUND: Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) services have been implemented with the dual aims of preventing harmful outcomes associated with early‐onset psychosis and improving prognosis. However, concerns have been raised regarding the ethical implications of involving young people in EIP ser...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Corsico, Paolo, Griffin‐Doyle, Michelle, Singh, Ilina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6120554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30197574
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/camh.12229
_version_ 1783352296065728512
author Corsico, Paolo
Griffin‐Doyle, Michelle
Singh, Ilina
author_facet Corsico, Paolo
Griffin‐Doyle, Michelle
Singh, Ilina
author_sort Corsico, Paolo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) services have been implemented with the dual aims of preventing harmful outcomes associated with early‐onset psychosis and improving prognosis. However, concerns have been raised regarding the ethical implications of involving young people in EIP services. One way to ensure high ethical standards and promote good practice in EIP delivery is through governance of clinical practice. This study aimed to investigate the normative dimensions of good practice in EIP through examination of clinical guideline documents published in England over the past 15 years. METHODS: A total of 14 clinical guidelines and relevant policy documents for EIP were retrieved and analysed using a mixed inductive and deductive thematic approach. Themes were derived from the data itself, whereas the development of broader categories was performed through a constant comparison with the scientific literature describing ethical issues in EIP. RESULTS: Ethical touchpoints of good practice in EIP included both procedural and substantive factors, which were seen to be interdependent and mutually constitutive. These ethical touchpoints were largely implicit in the documents analysed. Procedural requirements of EIP service delivery consisted of norms and rules pertaining to EIP service structure, adherence to codes of ethics, inclusivity, patient and family centredness and appropriate treatment provision. Substantive factors consisted of moral attributes that should be cultivated by healthcare professionals working in EIP: competency, empathy, sensitivity and trustworthiness. CONCLUSIONS: We argue that, to ensure good practice in EIP, procedural and substantive ethical expectations embedded in EIP guideline documents should be made explicit in EIP service and care delivery. We suggest that the procedural and substantive factors highlighted in this paper contribute useful dimensions for the eventual evaluation of good practice in EIP services across England.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6120554
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61205542018-09-05 What constitutes ‘good practice’ in early intervention for psychosis? Analysis of clinical guidelines Corsico, Paolo Griffin‐Doyle, Michelle Singh, Ilina Child Adolesc Ment Health Original Articles BACKGROUND: Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) services have been implemented with the dual aims of preventing harmful outcomes associated with early‐onset psychosis and improving prognosis. However, concerns have been raised regarding the ethical implications of involving young people in EIP services. One way to ensure high ethical standards and promote good practice in EIP delivery is through governance of clinical practice. This study aimed to investigate the normative dimensions of good practice in EIP through examination of clinical guideline documents published in England over the past 15 years. METHODS: A total of 14 clinical guidelines and relevant policy documents for EIP were retrieved and analysed using a mixed inductive and deductive thematic approach. Themes were derived from the data itself, whereas the development of broader categories was performed through a constant comparison with the scientific literature describing ethical issues in EIP. RESULTS: Ethical touchpoints of good practice in EIP included both procedural and substantive factors, which were seen to be interdependent and mutually constitutive. These ethical touchpoints were largely implicit in the documents analysed. Procedural requirements of EIP service delivery consisted of norms and rules pertaining to EIP service structure, adherence to codes of ethics, inclusivity, patient and family centredness and appropriate treatment provision. Substantive factors consisted of moral attributes that should be cultivated by healthcare professionals working in EIP: competency, empathy, sensitivity and trustworthiness. CONCLUSIONS: We argue that, to ensure good practice in EIP, procedural and substantive ethical expectations embedded in EIP guideline documents should be made explicit in EIP service and care delivery. We suggest that the procedural and substantive factors highlighted in this paper contribute useful dimensions for the eventual evaluation of good practice in EIP services across England. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-08-08 2018-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6120554/ /pubmed/30197574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/camh.12229 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Child and Adolescent Mental Health published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Corsico, Paolo
Griffin‐Doyle, Michelle
Singh, Ilina
What constitutes ‘good practice’ in early intervention for psychosis? Analysis of clinical guidelines
title What constitutes ‘good practice’ in early intervention for psychosis? Analysis of clinical guidelines
title_full What constitutes ‘good practice’ in early intervention for psychosis? Analysis of clinical guidelines
title_fullStr What constitutes ‘good practice’ in early intervention for psychosis? Analysis of clinical guidelines
title_full_unstemmed What constitutes ‘good practice’ in early intervention for psychosis? Analysis of clinical guidelines
title_short What constitutes ‘good practice’ in early intervention for psychosis? Analysis of clinical guidelines
title_sort what constitutes ‘good practice’ in early intervention for psychosis? analysis of clinical guidelines
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6120554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30197574
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/camh.12229
work_keys_str_mv AT corsicopaolo whatconstitutesgoodpracticeinearlyinterventionforpsychosisanalysisofclinicalguidelines
AT griffindoylemichelle whatconstitutesgoodpracticeinearlyinterventionforpsychosisanalysisofclinicalguidelines
AT singhilina whatconstitutesgoodpracticeinearlyinterventionforpsychosisanalysisofclinicalguidelines