Cargando…

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Questionnaire – Children with Difficulties for Chinese children or adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a cross-sectional survey

PURPOSE: The Questionnaire – Children with Difficulties (QCD) has been developed and used to evaluate daily-life problems in children during specified periods of the day. The objective of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the QCD for Chinese children or adolescents with atte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zheng, Yi, Du, Yasong, Su, Lin Yan, Zhang, Yanlei, Yuan, Zheng, Chen, Yun, Liu, Qing Qing, Ke, Xiao Yan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6120567/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30214208
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S166397
_version_ 1783352299200970752
author Zheng, Yi
Du, Yasong
Su, Lin Yan
Zhang, Yanlei
Yuan, Zheng
Chen, Yun
Liu, Qing Qing
Ke, Xiao Yan
author_facet Zheng, Yi
Du, Yasong
Su, Lin Yan
Zhang, Yanlei
Yuan, Zheng
Chen, Yun
Liu, Qing Qing
Ke, Xiao Yan
author_sort Zheng, Yi
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The Questionnaire – Children with Difficulties (QCD) has been developed and used to evaluate daily-life problems in children during specified periods of the day. The objective of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the QCD for Chinese children or adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Outpatients with ADHD aged 6–18 years who visited psychiatry clinics were enrolled at four study centers in China. Patients with severe psychiatric disorders were excluded. Parents of all enrolled patients were given the QCD, the Swanson, Nolan and Pelham IV (SNAP-IV), and the Weiss Functional Impairment Scale-Parent (WFIRS-P) questionnaires and were asked to complete all three questionnaires. The reliability of the QCD was examined by Cronbach’s alpha, which assessed the internal consistency of the questionnaire. Concurrent criterion validity of QCD scores was examined by Spearman’s correlation of QCD with SNAP-IV and WFIRS-P scores. RESULTS: A total of 200 Chinese patients were analyzed (average age, 10.4±2.66 years). The majority of patients were male (77.5%), and 49.0% had the combined ADHD subtype. Cronbach’s alpha for QCD was 0.88. Correlation coefficients of the QCD total score with SNAP-IV total score and WFIRS-P average score were −0.47 and −0.57, respectively. Correlations for the QCD with SNAP-IV and WFIRS-P were statistically significant (P<0.01). The area under the curve for sensitivity and specificity of the QCD compared with the SNAP-IV and WFIRS-P was 0.70 and 0.71, respectively. The ADHD severity discrimination threshold range of the QCD total score was 30–35. CONCLUSION: Our study results found the QCD to be a reliable and valid instrument and recommend its use in clinical practice to identify and evaluate daily-life problems of ADHD patients during specified periods of the day in China.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6120567
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61205672018-09-13 Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Questionnaire – Children with Difficulties for Chinese children or adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a cross-sectional survey Zheng, Yi Du, Yasong Su, Lin Yan Zhang, Yanlei Yuan, Zheng Chen, Yun Liu, Qing Qing Ke, Xiao Yan Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat Original Research PURPOSE: The Questionnaire – Children with Difficulties (QCD) has been developed and used to evaluate daily-life problems in children during specified periods of the day. The objective of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the QCD for Chinese children or adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Outpatients with ADHD aged 6–18 years who visited psychiatry clinics were enrolled at four study centers in China. Patients with severe psychiatric disorders were excluded. Parents of all enrolled patients were given the QCD, the Swanson, Nolan and Pelham IV (SNAP-IV), and the Weiss Functional Impairment Scale-Parent (WFIRS-P) questionnaires and were asked to complete all three questionnaires. The reliability of the QCD was examined by Cronbach’s alpha, which assessed the internal consistency of the questionnaire. Concurrent criterion validity of QCD scores was examined by Spearman’s correlation of QCD with SNAP-IV and WFIRS-P scores. RESULTS: A total of 200 Chinese patients were analyzed (average age, 10.4±2.66 years). The majority of patients were male (77.5%), and 49.0% had the combined ADHD subtype. Cronbach’s alpha for QCD was 0.88. Correlation coefficients of the QCD total score with SNAP-IV total score and WFIRS-P average score were −0.47 and −0.57, respectively. Correlations for the QCD with SNAP-IV and WFIRS-P were statistically significant (P<0.01). The area under the curve for sensitivity and specificity of the QCD compared with the SNAP-IV and WFIRS-P was 0.70 and 0.71, respectively. The ADHD severity discrimination threshold range of the QCD total score was 30–35. CONCLUSION: Our study results found the QCD to be a reliable and valid instrument and recommend its use in clinical practice to identify and evaluate daily-life problems of ADHD patients during specified periods of the day in China. Dove Medical Press 2018-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6120567/ /pubmed/30214208 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S166397 Text en © 2018 Zheng et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Zheng, Yi
Du, Yasong
Su, Lin Yan
Zhang, Yanlei
Yuan, Zheng
Chen, Yun
Liu, Qing Qing
Ke, Xiao Yan
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Questionnaire – Children with Difficulties for Chinese children or adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a cross-sectional survey
title Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Questionnaire – Children with Difficulties for Chinese children or adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a cross-sectional survey
title_full Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Questionnaire – Children with Difficulties for Chinese children or adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a cross-sectional survey
title_fullStr Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Questionnaire – Children with Difficulties for Chinese children or adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a cross-sectional survey
title_full_unstemmed Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Questionnaire – Children with Difficulties for Chinese children or adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a cross-sectional survey
title_short Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Questionnaire – Children with Difficulties for Chinese children or adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a cross-sectional survey
title_sort reliability and validity of the chinese version of questionnaire – children with difficulties for chinese children or adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a cross-sectional survey
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6120567/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30214208
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S166397
work_keys_str_mv AT zhengyi reliabilityandvalidityofthechineseversionofquestionnairechildrenwithdifficultiesforchinesechildrenoradolescentswithattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorderacrosssectionalsurvey
AT duyasong reliabilityandvalidityofthechineseversionofquestionnairechildrenwithdifficultiesforchinesechildrenoradolescentswithattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorderacrosssectionalsurvey
AT sulinyan reliabilityandvalidityofthechineseversionofquestionnairechildrenwithdifficultiesforchinesechildrenoradolescentswithattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorderacrosssectionalsurvey
AT zhangyanlei reliabilityandvalidityofthechineseversionofquestionnairechildrenwithdifficultiesforchinesechildrenoradolescentswithattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorderacrosssectionalsurvey
AT yuanzheng reliabilityandvalidityofthechineseversionofquestionnairechildrenwithdifficultiesforchinesechildrenoradolescentswithattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorderacrosssectionalsurvey
AT chenyun reliabilityandvalidityofthechineseversionofquestionnairechildrenwithdifficultiesforchinesechildrenoradolescentswithattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorderacrosssectionalsurvey
AT liuqingqing reliabilityandvalidityofthechineseversionofquestionnairechildrenwithdifficultiesforchinesechildrenoradolescentswithattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorderacrosssectionalsurvey
AT kexiaoyan reliabilityandvalidityofthechineseversionofquestionnairechildrenwithdifficultiesforchinesechildrenoradolescentswithattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorderacrosssectionalsurvey