Cargando…
Image analysis with deep learning to predict breast cancer grade, ER status, histologic subtype, and intrinsic subtype
RNA-based, multi-gene molecular assays are available and widely used for patients with ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancers. However, RNA-based genomic tests can be costly and are not available in many countries. Methods for inferring molecular subtype from histologic images may identify patient...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6120869/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30182055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41523-018-0079-1 |
_version_ | 1783352337941659648 |
---|---|
author | Couture, Heather D. Williams, Lindsay A. Geradts, Joseph Nyante, Sarah J. Butler, Ebonee N. Marron, J. S. Perou, Charles M. Troester, Melissa A. Niethammer, Marc |
author_facet | Couture, Heather D. Williams, Lindsay A. Geradts, Joseph Nyante, Sarah J. Butler, Ebonee N. Marron, J. S. Perou, Charles M. Troester, Melissa A. Niethammer, Marc |
author_sort | Couture, Heather D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | RNA-based, multi-gene molecular assays are available and widely used for patients with ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancers. However, RNA-based genomic tests can be costly and are not available in many countries. Methods for inferring molecular subtype from histologic images may identify patients most likely to benefit from further genomic testing. To identify patients who could benefit from molecular testing based on H&E stained histologic images, we developed an image analysis approach using deep learning. A training set of 571 breast tumors was used to create image-based classifiers for tumor grade, ER status, PAM50 intrinsic subtype, histologic subtype, and risk of recurrence score (ROR-PT). The resulting classifiers were applied to an independent test set (n = 288), and accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of each was assessed on the test set. Histologic image analysis with deep learning distinguished low-intermediate vs. high tumor grade (82% accuracy), ER status (84% accuracy), Basal-like vs. non-Basal-like (77% accuracy), Ductal vs. Lobular (94% accuracy), and high vs. low-medium ROR-PT score (75% accuracy). Sampling considerations in the training set minimized bias in the test set. Incorrect classification of ER status was significantly more common for Luminal B tumors. These data provide proof of principle that molecular marker status, including a critical clinical biomarker (i.e., ER status), can be predicted with accuracy >75% based on H&E features. Image-based methods could be promising for identifying patients with a greater need for further genomic testing, or in place of classically scored variables typically accomplished using human-based scoring. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6120869 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61208692018-09-04 Image analysis with deep learning to predict breast cancer grade, ER status, histologic subtype, and intrinsic subtype Couture, Heather D. Williams, Lindsay A. Geradts, Joseph Nyante, Sarah J. Butler, Ebonee N. Marron, J. S. Perou, Charles M. Troester, Melissa A. Niethammer, Marc NPJ Breast Cancer Article RNA-based, multi-gene molecular assays are available and widely used for patients with ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancers. However, RNA-based genomic tests can be costly and are not available in many countries. Methods for inferring molecular subtype from histologic images may identify patients most likely to benefit from further genomic testing. To identify patients who could benefit from molecular testing based on H&E stained histologic images, we developed an image analysis approach using deep learning. A training set of 571 breast tumors was used to create image-based classifiers for tumor grade, ER status, PAM50 intrinsic subtype, histologic subtype, and risk of recurrence score (ROR-PT). The resulting classifiers were applied to an independent test set (n = 288), and accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of each was assessed on the test set. Histologic image analysis with deep learning distinguished low-intermediate vs. high tumor grade (82% accuracy), ER status (84% accuracy), Basal-like vs. non-Basal-like (77% accuracy), Ductal vs. Lobular (94% accuracy), and high vs. low-medium ROR-PT score (75% accuracy). Sampling considerations in the training set minimized bias in the test set. Incorrect classification of ER status was significantly more common for Luminal B tumors. These data provide proof of principle that molecular marker status, including a critical clinical biomarker (i.e., ER status), can be predicted with accuracy >75% based on H&E features. Image-based methods could be promising for identifying patients with a greater need for further genomic testing, or in place of classically scored variables typically accomplished using human-based scoring. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6120869/ /pubmed/30182055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41523-018-0079-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Couture, Heather D. Williams, Lindsay A. Geradts, Joseph Nyante, Sarah J. Butler, Ebonee N. Marron, J. S. Perou, Charles M. Troester, Melissa A. Niethammer, Marc Image analysis with deep learning to predict breast cancer grade, ER status, histologic subtype, and intrinsic subtype |
title | Image analysis with deep learning to predict breast cancer grade, ER status, histologic subtype, and intrinsic subtype |
title_full | Image analysis with deep learning to predict breast cancer grade, ER status, histologic subtype, and intrinsic subtype |
title_fullStr | Image analysis with deep learning to predict breast cancer grade, ER status, histologic subtype, and intrinsic subtype |
title_full_unstemmed | Image analysis with deep learning to predict breast cancer grade, ER status, histologic subtype, and intrinsic subtype |
title_short | Image analysis with deep learning to predict breast cancer grade, ER status, histologic subtype, and intrinsic subtype |
title_sort | image analysis with deep learning to predict breast cancer grade, er status, histologic subtype, and intrinsic subtype |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6120869/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30182055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41523-018-0079-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT coutureheatherd imageanalysiswithdeeplearningtopredictbreastcancergradeerstatushistologicsubtypeandintrinsicsubtype AT williamslindsaya imageanalysiswithdeeplearningtopredictbreastcancergradeerstatushistologicsubtypeandintrinsicsubtype AT geradtsjoseph imageanalysiswithdeeplearningtopredictbreastcancergradeerstatushistologicsubtypeandintrinsicsubtype AT nyantesarahj imageanalysiswithdeeplearningtopredictbreastcancergradeerstatushistologicsubtypeandintrinsicsubtype AT butlereboneen imageanalysiswithdeeplearningtopredictbreastcancergradeerstatushistologicsubtypeandintrinsicsubtype AT marronjs imageanalysiswithdeeplearningtopredictbreastcancergradeerstatushistologicsubtypeandintrinsicsubtype AT peroucharlesm imageanalysiswithdeeplearningtopredictbreastcancergradeerstatushistologicsubtypeandintrinsicsubtype AT troestermelissaa imageanalysiswithdeeplearningtopredictbreastcancergradeerstatushistologicsubtypeandintrinsicsubtype AT niethammermarc imageanalysiswithdeeplearningtopredictbreastcancergradeerstatushistologicsubtypeandintrinsicsubtype |