Cargando…

Clinical Performance Evaluation of VersaTrek 528 Blood Culture System in a Chinese Tertiary Hospital

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of VersaTrek 528 compared to BACTEC FX 400 blood culture (BC) systems. Materials and Methods: Simulated and clinically obtained BCs were used in the study. Confirmed bacterial species (n = 78), including 43 Gram-positives, 30...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yue, Pinli, Zhou, Menglan, Kudinha, Timothy, Xie, Xiuli, Du, Juan, Song, Hongmei, Zhang, Lintao, Ma, Xiaojun, Weng, Li, Chai, Wenzhao, Zhu, Huadong, Yang, Qiwen, Xu, Ying-Chun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6120971/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30210487
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02027
_version_ 1783352362126016512
author Yue, Pinli
Zhou, Menglan
Kudinha, Timothy
Xie, Xiuli
Du, Juan
Song, Hongmei
Zhang, Lintao
Ma, Xiaojun
Weng, Li
Chai, Wenzhao
Zhu, Huadong
Yang, Qiwen
Xu, Ying-Chun
author_facet Yue, Pinli
Zhou, Menglan
Kudinha, Timothy
Xie, Xiuli
Du, Juan
Song, Hongmei
Zhang, Lintao
Ma, Xiaojun
Weng, Li
Chai, Wenzhao
Zhu, Huadong
Yang, Qiwen
Xu, Ying-Chun
author_sort Yue, Pinli
collection PubMed
description Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of VersaTrek 528 compared to BACTEC FX 400 blood culture (BC) systems. Materials and Methods: Simulated and clinically obtained BCs were used in the study. Confirmed bacterial species (n = 78), including 43 Gram-positives, 30 Gram-negatives, and 5 Candida albicans strains, were each inoculated into BC bottles. Clinically obtained BCs were subdivided into two groups, A and B. In group A were 72 BC sets (pair: aerobic and anaerobic) in which a set inoculated with 5 ml blood was processed in the VersaTrek BC system, whilst the one inoculated with 10 ml blood was processed in the FX BC system. In group B, 76 BC sets (pairs) corresponding to 152 VersaTrek bottles and 152 FX bottles were inoculated with the same volume (10 ml) of blood, and processed in each system. Results: In the simulated BC study, 90% (63/70) of the VersaTrek aerobic bottles were positive, which was higher than that of FX 400 (59/70, 84%), but was not statistically significant (P = 0.423). In contrast, FX 400 anaerobic bottles had a higher positive rate than the other BC system (84 vs. 77%), although it was statistically insignificant (P = 0.267). Time to detection of organisms in the two BCs was comparable for both aerobic (P = 0.131) and anaerobic bottles (P = 0.104). In clinical BCs of group A, FX BC system had slightly higher positive rates for both aerobic (11.1 vs. 9.7%, P = 0.312) and anaerobic (8.3 vs. 6.9%, P = 0.375) bottles. However, the difference was not statistically significant. In group B, VersaTrek aerobic bottles had a higher positive rate compared to the other BC system (10.5 vs. 5.2%, P = 0.063). In terms of positive rates of sub-studies A and B, VersaTrek and FX BC systems were comparable. Conclusion: There was no significant difference between the two BC systems in the detection of bacteria and fungi in simulated BCs. In clinical BCs, the performance of the VersaTrek BC system, with inoculation of 5 or 10 ml patient’s blood, was comparable to the FX system with inoculation of 10 ml patient’s blood.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6120971
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61209712018-09-12 Clinical Performance Evaluation of VersaTrek 528 Blood Culture System in a Chinese Tertiary Hospital Yue, Pinli Zhou, Menglan Kudinha, Timothy Xie, Xiuli Du, Juan Song, Hongmei Zhang, Lintao Ma, Xiaojun Weng, Li Chai, Wenzhao Zhu, Huadong Yang, Qiwen Xu, Ying-Chun Front Microbiol Microbiology Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of VersaTrek 528 compared to BACTEC FX 400 blood culture (BC) systems. Materials and Methods: Simulated and clinically obtained BCs were used in the study. Confirmed bacterial species (n = 78), including 43 Gram-positives, 30 Gram-negatives, and 5 Candida albicans strains, were each inoculated into BC bottles. Clinically obtained BCs were subdivided into two groups, A and B. In group A were 72 BC sets (pair: aerobic and anaerobic) in which a set inoculated with 5 ml blood was processed in the VersaTrek BC system, whilst the one inoculated with 10 ml blood was processed in the FX BC system. In group B, 76 BC sets (pairs) corresponding to 152 VersaTrek bottles and 152 FX bottles were inoculated with the same volume (10 ml) of blood, and processed in each system. Results: In the simulated BC study, 90% (63/70) of the VersaTrek aerobic bottles were positive, which was higher than that of FX 400 (59/70, 84%), but was not statistically significant (P = 0.423). In contrast, FX 400 anaerobic bottles had a higher positive rate than the other BC system (84 vs. 77%), although it was statistically insignificant (P = 0.267). Time to detection of organisms in the two BCs was comparable for both aerobic (P = 0.131) and anaerobic bottles (P = 0.104). In clinical BCs of group A, FX BC system had slightly higher positive rates for both aerobic (11.1 vs. 9.7%, P = 0.312) and anaerobic (8.3 vs. 6.9%, P = 0.375) bottles. However, the difference was not statistically significant. In group B, VersaTrek aerobic bottles had a higher positive rate compared to the other BC system (10.5 vs. 5.2%, P = 0.063). In terms of positive rates of sub-studies A and B, VersaTrek and FX BC systems were comparable. Conclusion: There was no significant difference between the two BC systems in the detection of bacteria and fungi in simulated BCs. In clinical BCs, the performance of the VersaTrek BC system, with inoculation of 5 or 10 ml patient’s blood, was comparable to the FX system with inoculation of 10 ml patient’s blood. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6120971/ /pubmed/30210487 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02027 Text en Copyright © 2018 Yue, Zhou, Kudinha, Xie, Du, Song, Zhang, Ma, Weng, Chai, Zhu, Yang and Xu. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Yue, Pinli
Zhou, Menglan
Kudinha, Timothy
Xie, Xiuli
Du, Juan
Song, Hongmei
Zhang, Lintao
Ma, Xiaojun
Weng, Li
Chai, Wenzhao
Zhu, Huadong
Yang, Qiwen
Xu, Ying-Chun
Clinical Performance Evaluation of VersaTrek 528 Blood Culture System in a Chinese Tertiary Hospital
title Clinical Performance Evaluation of VersaTrek 528 Blood Culture System in a Chinese Tertiary Hospital
title_full Clinical Performance Evaluation of VersaTrek 528 Blood Culture System in a Chinese Tertiary Hospital
title_fullStr Clinical Performance Evaluation of VersaTrek 528 Blood Culture System in a Chinese Tertiary Hospital
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Performance Evaluation of VersaTrek 528 Blood Culture System in a Chinese Tertiary Hospital
title_short Clinical Performance Evaluation of VersaTrek 528 Blood Culture System in a Chinese Tertiary Hospital
title_sort clinical performance evaluation of versatrek 528 blood culture system in a chinese tertiary hospital
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6120971/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30210487
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02027
work_keys_str_mv AT yuepinli clinicalperformanceevaluationofversatrek528bloodculturesysteminachinesetertiaryhospital
AT zhoumenglan clinicalperformanceevaluationofversatrek528bloodculturesysteminachinesetertiaryhospital
AT kudinhatimothy clinicalperformanceevaluationofversatrek528bloodculturesysteminachinesetertiaryhospital
AT xiexiuli clinicalperformanceevaluationofversatrek528bloodculturesysteminachinesetertiaryhospital
AT dujuan clinicalperformanceevaluationofversatrek528bloodculturesysteminachinesetertiaryhospital
AT songhongmei clinicalperformanceevaluationofversatrek528bloodculturesysteminachinesetertiaryhospital
AT zhanglintao clinicalperformanceevaluationofversatrek528bloodculturesysteminachinesetertiaryhospital
AT maxiaojun clinicalperformanceevaluationofversatrek528bloodculturesysteminachinesetertiaryhospital
AT wengli clinicalperformanceevaluationofversatrek528bloodculturesysteminachinesetertiaryhospital
AT chaiwenzhao clinicalperformanceevaluationofversatrek528bloodculturesysteminachinesetertiaryhospital
AT zhuhuadong clinicalperformanceevaluationofversatrek528bloodculturesysteminachinesetertiaryhospital
AT yangqiwen clinicalperformanceevaluationofversatrek528bloodculturesysteminachinesetertiaryhospital
AT xuyingchun clinicalperformanceevaluationofversatrek528bloodculturesysteminachinesetertiaryhospital