Cargando…
The tyranny of choice: reproductive selection in the future
This article explores the enormous challenges to reproductive decision making that could result from two emerging technologies: the potential capacity to create vast numbers of embryos for preimplantation genetic diagnosis and the ability to obtain ever more predictive information about the embryo....
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6121058/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30191066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsy014 |
_version_ | 1783352382989533184 |
---|---|
author | Suter, Sonia M |
author_facet | Suter, Sonia M |
author_sort | Suter, Sonia M |
collection | PubMed |
description | This article explores the enormous challenges to reproductive decision making that could result from two emerging technologies: the potential capacity to create vast numbers of embryos for preimplantation genetic diagnosis and the ability to obtain ever more predictive information about the embryo. Together these technologies could change our reproductive experience, exacerbate existing inequities, and profoundly affect reproductive decision making. Simply comprehending the dizzying amounts of predictive information about the health and traits of future children will overwhelm future parents. But trying to choose embryos with the ‘best’ combination of genetic variants could be paralyzing. Nevertheless, numerous pressures will make this technology alluring, compelling providers to develop remedies to assist future parents with these difficult reproductive decisions. The remedies, however, will create their own challenges. Some might test the limits of reproductive autonomy and heighten social inequities. A particularly vexing remedy would be the development of algorithms for embryo selection, which could routinize reproductive decisions, reduce societal diversity, exacerbate ‘choice overload’ effects, challenge professional norms, and raise the specter of eugenics. Ultimately, this article is a cautionary tale urging circumspection as technological advancements seem to propel us inevitably toward a reproductive future that could create a tyranny of choice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6121058 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61210582018-09-06 The tyranny of choice: reproductive selection in the future Suter, Sonia M J Law Biosci Original Article This article explores the enormous challenges to reproductive decision making that could result from two emerging technologies: the potential capacity to create vast numbers of embryos for preimplantation genetic diagnosis and the ability to obtain ever more predictive information about the embryo. Together these technologies could change our reproductive experience, exacerbate existing inequities, and profoundly affect reproductive decision making. Simply comprehending the dizzying amounts of predictive information about the health and traits of future children will overwhelm future parents. But trying to choose embryos with the ‘best’ combination of genetic variants could be paralyzing. Nevertheless, numerous pressures will make this technology alluring, compelling providers to develop remedies to assist future parents with these difficult reproductive decisions. The remedies, however, will create their own challenges. Some might test the limits of reproductive autonomy and heighten social inequities. A particularly vexing remedy would be the development of algorithms for embryo selection, which could routinize reproductive decisions, reduce societal diversity, exacerbate ‘choice overload’ effects, challenge professional norms, and raise the specter of eugenics. Ultimately, this article is a cautionary tale urging circumspection as technological advancements seem to propel us inevitably toward a reproductive future that could create a tyranny of choice. Oxford University Press 2018-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6121058/ /pubmed/30191066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsy014 Text en The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Duke University School of Law, Harvard Law School, Oxford University Press, and Stanford Law School. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original Article Suter, Sonia M The tyranny of choice: reproductive selection in the future |
title | The tyranny of choice: reproductive selection in the future |
title_full | The tyranny of choice: reproductive selection in the future |
title_fullStr | The tyranny of choice: reproductive selection in the future |
title_full_unstemmed | The tyranny of choice: reproductive selection in the future |
title_short | The tyranny of choice: reproductive selection in the future |
title_sort | tyranny of choice: reproductive selection in the future |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6121058/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30191066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsy014 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sutersoniam thetyrannyofchoicereproductiveselectioninthefuture AT sutersoniam tyrannyofchoicereproductiveselectioninthefuture |