Cargando…

The tyranny of choice: reproductive selection in the future

This article explores the enormous challenges to reproductive decision making that could result from two emerging technologies: the potential capacity to create vast numbers of embryos for preimplantation genetic diagnosis and the ability to obtain ever more predictive information about the embryo....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Suter, Sonia M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6121058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30191066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsy014
_version_ 1783352382989533184
author Suter, Sonia M
author_facet Suter, Sonia M
author_sort Suter, Sonia M
collection PubMed
description This article explores the enormous challenges to reproductive decision making that could result from two emerging technologies: the potential capacity to create vast numbers of embryos for preimplantation genetic diagnosis and the ability to obtain ever more predictive information about the embryo. Together these technologies could change our reproductive experience, exacerbate existing inequities, and profoundly affect reproductive decision making. Simply comprehending the dizzying amounts of predictive information about the health and traits of future children will overwhelm future parents. But trying to choose embryos with the ‘best’ combination of genetic variants could be paralyzing. Nevertheless, numerous pressures will make this technology alluring, compelling providers to develop remedies to assist future parents with these difficult reproductive decisions. The remedies, however, will create their own challenges. Some might test the limits of reproductive autonomy and heighten social inequities. A particularly vexing remedy would be the development of algorithms for embryo selection, which could routinize reproductive decisions, reduce societal diversity, exacerbate ‘choice overload’ effects, challenge professional norms, and raise the specter of eugenics. Ultimately, this article is a cautionary tale urging circumspection as technological advancements seem to propel us inevitably toward a reproductive future that could create a tyranny of choice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6121058
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61210582018-09-06 The tyranny of choice: reproductive selection in the future Suter, Sonia M J Law Biosci Original Article This article explores the enormous challenges to reproductive decision making that could result from two emerging technologies: the potential capacity to create vast numbers of embryos for preimplantation genetic diagnosis and the ability to obtain ever more predictive information about the embryo. Together these technologies could change our reproductive experience, exacerbate existing inequities, and profoundly affect reproductive decision making. Simply comprehending the dizzying amounts of predictive information about the health and traits of future children will overwhelm future parents. But trying to choose embryos with the ‘best’ combination of genetic variants could be paralyzing. Nevertheless, numerous pressures will make this technology alluring, compelling providers to develop remedies to assist future parents with these difficult reproductive decisions. The remedies, however, will create their own challenges. Some might test the limits of reproductive autonomy and heighten social inequities. A particularly vexing remedy would be the development of algorithms for embryo selection, which could routinize reproductive decisions, reduce societal diversity, exacerbate ‘choice overload’ effects, challenge professional norms, and raise the specter of eugenics. Ultimately, this article is a cautionary tale urging circumspection as technological advancements seem to propel us inevitably toward a reproductive future that could create a tyranny of choice. Oxford University Press 2018-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6121058/ /pubmed/30191066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsy014 Text en The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Duke University School of Law, Harvard Law School, Oxford University Press, and Stanford Law School. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Article
Suter, Sonia M
The tyranny of choice: reproductive selection in the future
title The tyranny of choice: reproductive selection in the future
title_full The tyranny of choice: reproductive selection in the future
title_fullStr The tyranny of choice: reproductive selection in the future
title_full_unstemmed The tyranny of choice: reproductive selection in the future
title_short The tyranny of choice: reproductive selection in the future
title_sort tyranny of choice: reproductive selection in the future
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6121058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30191066
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsy014
work_keys_str_mv AT sutersoniam thetyrannyofchoicereproductiveselectioninthefuture
AT sutersoniam tyrannyofchoicereproductiveselectioninthefuture