Cargando…
Creating life after death: should posthumous reproduction be legally permissible without the deceased's prior consent?
Scientific advances enable to retrieve and use gametes of a deceased person, thereby creating a child after the death of a genetic parent. This article reviews and compares legislation governing posthumous reproduction in the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, and Israel. It shows that ea...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6121062/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30191068 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsy017 |
_version_ | 1783352384007700480 |
---|---|
author | Simana, Shelly |
author_facet | Simana, Shelly |
author_sort | Simana, Shelly |
collection | PubMed |
description | Scientific advances enable to retrieve and use gametes of a deceased person, thereby creating a child after the death of a genetic parent. This article reviews and compares legislation governing posthumous reproduction in the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, and Israel. It shows that each country has its own distinctive features, yet three common elements exist—legal ambiguity, a requirement for prior consent, and permission for the partner, but not the parents, to retrieve and use the deceased's gametes. The article demonstrates that courts often do not follow the legal requirements, and thus there are no clear guiding principles regarding posthumous reproduction. The article then discusses three justifications for permitting posthumous reproduction in the absence of the deceased's prior consent. The first justification relates to an interest in ‘genetic continuity’, which reflects people's desire in leaving a ‘piece’ of themselves in the world and maintaining a chain of continuity. The second justification concerns the ‘respect-for-wishes’ model of autonomy, according to which people must be treated in a way that we assume they would want to be treated. The third justification touches upon the interests of the deceased's partner and parents, as well as of the resulting child. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6121062 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-61210622018-09-06 Creating life after death: should posthumous reproduction be legally permissible without the deceased's prior consent? Simana, Shelly J Law Biosci Original Article Scientific advances enable to retrieve and use gametes of a deceased person, thereby creating a child after the death of a genetic parent. This article reviews and compares legislation governing posthumous reproduction in the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, and Israel. It shows that each country has its own distinctive features, yet three common elements exist—legal ambiguity, a requirement for prior consent, and permission for the partner, but not the parents, to retrieve and use the deceased's gametes. The article demonstrates that courts often do not follow the legal requirements, and thus there are no clear guiding principles regarding posthumous reproduction. The article then discusses three justifications for permitting posthumous reproduction in the absence of the deceased's prior consent. The first justification relates to an interest in ‘genetic continuity’, which reflects people's desire in leaving a ‘piece’ of themselves in the world and maintaining a chain of continuity. The second justification concerns the ‘respect-for-wishes’ model of autonomy, according to which people must be treated in a way that we assume they would want to be treated. The third justification touches upon the interests of the deceased's partner and parents, as well as of the resulting child. Oxford University Press 2018-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6121062/ /pubmed/30191068 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsy017 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Duke University School of Law, Harvard Law School, Oxford University Press, and Stanford Law School. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original Article Simana, Shelly Creating life after death: should posthumous reproduction be legally permissible without the deceased's prior consent? |
title | Creating life after death: should posthumous reproduction be legally permissible without the deceased's prior consent? |
title_full | Creating life after death: should posthumous reproduction be legally permissible without the deceased's prior consent? |
title_fullStr | Creating life after death: should posthumous reproduction be legally permissible without the deceased's prior consent? |
title_full_unstemmed | Creating life after death: should posthumous reproduction be legally permissible without the deceased's prior consent? |
title_short | Creating life after death: should posthumous reproduction be legally permissible without the deceased's prior consent? |
title_sort | creating life after death: should posthumous reproduction be legally permissible without the deceased's prior consent? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6121062/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30191068 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsy017 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT simanashelly creatinglifeafterdeathshouldposthumousreproductionbelegallypermissiblewithoutthedeceasedspriorconsent |