Cargando…

Creating life after death: should posthumous reproduction be legally permissible without the deceased's prior consent?

Scientific advances enable to retrieve and use gametes of a deceased person, thereby creating a child after the death of a genetic parent. This article reviews and compares legislation governing posthumous reproduction in the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, and Israel. It shows that ea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Simana, Shelly
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6121062/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30191068
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsy017
_version_ 1783352384007700480
author Simana, Shelly
author_facet Simana, Shelly
author_sort Simana, Shelly
collection PubMed
description Scientific advances enable to retrieve and use gametes of a deceased person, thereby creating a child after the death of a genetic parent. This article reviews and compares legislation governing posthumous reproduction in the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, and Israel. It shows that each country has its own distinctive features, yet three common elements exist—legal ambiguity, a requirement for prior consent, and permission for the partner, but not the parents, to retrieve and use the deceased's gametes. The article demonstrates that courts often do not follow the legal requirements, and thus there are no clear guiding principles regarding posthumous reproduction. The article then discusses three justifications for permitting posthumous reproduction in the absence of the deceased's prior consent. The first justification relates to an interest in ‘genetic continuity’, which reflects people's desire in leaving a ‘piece’ of themselves in the world and maintaining a chain of continuity. The second justification concerns the ‘respect-for-wishes’ model of autonomy, according to which people must be treated in a way that we assume they would want to be treated. The third justification touches upon the interests of the deceased's partner and parents, as well as of the resulting child.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6121062
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61210622018-09-06 Creating life after death: should posthumous reproduction be legally permissible without the deceased's prior consent? Simana, Shelly J Law Biosci Original Article Scientific advances enable to retrieve and use gametes of a deceased person, thereby creating a child after the death of a genetic parent. This article reviews and compares legislation governing posthumous reproduction in the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, and Israel. It shows that each country has its own distinctive features, yet three common elements exist—legal ambiguity, a requirement for prior consent, and permission for the partner, but not the parents, to retrieve and use the deceased's gametes. The article demonstrates that courts often do not follow the legal requirements, and thus there are no clear guiding principles regarding posthumous reproduction. The article then discusses three justifications for permitting posthumous reproduction in the absence of the deceased's prior consent. The first justification relates to an interest in ‘genetic continuity’, which reflects people's desire in leaving a ‘piece’ of themselves in the world and maintaining a chain of continuity. The second justification concerns the ‘respect-for-wishes’ model of autonomy, according to which people must be treated in a way that we assume they would want to be treated. The third justification touches upon the interests of the deceased's partner and parents, as well as of the resulting child. Oxford University Press 2018-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6121062/ /pubmed/30191068 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsy017 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Duke University School of Law, Harvard Law School, Oxford University Press, and Stanford Law School. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Article
Simana, Shelly
Creating life after death: should posthumous reproduction be legally permissible without the deceased's prior consent?
title Creating life after death: should posthumous reproduction be legally permissible without the deceased's prior consent?
title_full Creating life after death: should posthumous reproduction be legally permissible without the deceased's prior consent?
title_fullStr Creating life after death: should posthumous reproduction be legally permissible without the deceased's prior consent?
title_full_unstemmed Creating life after death: should posthumous reproduction be legally permissible without the deceased's prior consent?
title_short Creating life after death: should posthumous reproduction be legally permissible without the deceased's prior consent?
title_sort creating life after death: should posthumous reproduction be legally permissible without the deceased's prior consent?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6121062/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30191068
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsy017
work_keys_str_mv AT simanashelly creatinglifeafterdeathshouldposthumousreproductionbelegallypermissiblewithoutthedeceasedspriorconsent