Cargando…

Cornus mas and Cornus Officinalis—Analogies and Differences of Two Medicinal Plants Traditionally Used

Among 65 species belonging to the genus Cornus only two, Cornus mas L. and Cornus officinalis Sieb. et Zucc. (Cornaceae), have been traditionally used since ancient times. Cornus mas (cornelian cherry) is native to southern Europe and southwest Asia, whereas C. officinalis (Asiatic dogwood, cornel d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Czerwińska, Monika E., Melzig, Matthias F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6121078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30210335
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.00894
_version_ 1783352387804594176
author Czerwińska, Monika E.
Melzig, Matthias F.
author_facet Czerwińska, Monika E.
Melzig, Matthias F.
author_sort Czerwińska, Monika E.
collection PubMed
description Among 65 species belonging to the genus Cornus only two, Cornus mas L. and Cornus officinalis Sieb. et Zucc. (Cornaceae), have been traditionally used since ancient times. Cornus mas (cornelian cherry) is native to southern Europe and southwest Asia, whereas C. officinalis (Asiatic dogwood, cornel dogwood) is a deciduous tree distributed in eastern Asia, mainly in China, as well as Korea and Japan. Based on the different geographic distribution of the closely related species but clearly distinct taxa, the ethnopharmacological use of C. mas and C. officinalis seems to be independently originated. Many reports on the quality of C. mas fruits were performed due to their value as edible fruits, and few reports compared their physicochemical properties with other edible fruits. However, the detailed phytochemical profiles of C. mas and C. officinalis, in particular fruits, have never been compared. The aim of this review was highlighting the similarities and differences of phytochemicals found in fruits of C. mas and C. officinalis in relation to their biological effects as well as compare the therapeutic use of fruits from both traditional species. The fruits of C. mas and C. officinalis are characterized by the presence of secondary metabolites, in particular iridoids, anthocyanins, phenolic acids and flavonoids. However, much more not widely known iridoids, such as morroniside, as well as tannins were detected particularly in fruits of C. officinalis. The referred studies of biological activity of both species indicate their antidiabetic and hepatoprotective properties. Based on the available reports antihyperlipidemic and anticoagulant activity seems to be unique for extracts of C. mas fruits, whereas antiosteoporotic and immunomodulatory activities were assigned to preparations of C. officinalis fruits. In conclusion, the comparison of phytochemical composition of fruits from both species revealed a wide range of similarities as well as some constituents unique for cornelian cherry or Asiatic dogwood. Thus, these phytochemicals are considered the important factor determining the biological activity and justifying the use of C. mas and C. officinalis in the traditional European and Asiatic medicine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6121078
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61210782018-09-12 Cornus mas and Cornus Officinalis—Analogies and Differences of Two Medicinal Plants Traditionally Used Czerwińska, Monika E. Melzig, Matthias F. Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Among 65 species belonging to the genus Cornus only two, Cornus mas L. and Cornus officinalis Sieb. et Zucc. (Cornaceae), have been traditionally used since ancient times. Cornus mas (cornelian cherry) is native to southern Europe and southwest Asia, whereas C. officinalis (Asiatic dogwood, cornel dogwood) is a deciduous tree distributed in eastern Asia, mainly in China, as well as Korea and Japan. Based on the different geographic distribution of the closely related species but clearly distinct taxa, the ethnopharmacological use of C. mas and C. officinalis seems to be independently originated. Many reports on the quality of C. mas fruits were performed due to their value as edible fruits, and few reports compared their physicochemical properties with other edible fruits. However, the detailed phytochemical profiles of C. mas and C. officinalis, in particular fruits, have never been compared. The aim of this review was highlighting the similarities and differences of phytochemicals found in fruits of C. mas and C. officinalis in relation to their biological effects as well as compare the therapeutic use of fruits from both traditional species. The fruits of C. mas and C. officinalis are characterized by the presence of secondary metabolites, in particular iridoids, anthocyanins, phenolic acids and flavonoids. However, much more not widely known iridoids, such as morroniside, as well as tannins were detected particularly in fruits of C. officinalis. The referred studies of biological activity of both species indicate their antidiabetic and hepatoprotective properties. Based on the available reports antihyperlipidemic and anticoagulant activity seems to be unique for extracts of C. mas fruits, whereas antiosteoporotic and immunomodulatory activities were assigned to preparations of C. officinalis fruits. In conclusion, the comparison of phytochemical composition of fruits from both species revealed a wide range of similarities as well as some constituents unique for cornelian cherry or Asiatic dogwood. Thus, these phytochemicals are considered the important factor determining the biological activity and justifying the use of C. mas and C. officinalis in the traditional European and Asiatic medicine. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6121078/ /pubmed/30210335 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.00894 Text en Copyright © 2018 Czerwińska and Melzig. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pharmacology
Czerwińska, Monika E.
Melzig, Matthias F.
Cornus mas and Cornus Officinalis—Analogies and Differences of Two Medicinal Plants Traditionally Used
title Cornus mas and Cornus Officinalis—Analogies and Differences of Two Medicinal Plants Traditionally Used
title_full Cornus mas and Cornus Officinalis—Analogies and Differences of Two Medicinal Plants Traditionally Used
title_fullStr Cornus mas and Cornus Officinalis—Analogies and Differences of Two Medicinal Plants Traditionally Used
title_full_unstemmed Cornus mas and Cornus Officinalis—Analogies and Differences of Two Medicinal Plants Traditionally Used
title_short Cornus mas and Cornus Officinalis—Analogies and Differences of Two Medicinal Plants Traditionally Used
title_sort cornus mas and cornus officinalis—analogies and differences of two medicinal plants traditionally used
topic Pharmacology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6121078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30210335
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.00894
work_keys_str_mv AT czerwinskamonikae cornusmasandcornusofficinalisanalogiesanddifferencesoftwomedicinalplantstraditionallyused
AT melzigmatthiasf cornusmasandcornusofficinalisanalogiesanddifferencesoftwomedicinalplantstraditionallyused