Cargando…

Assessment of the Efficacy of ReoGo-J Robotic Training Against Other Rehabilitation Therapies for Upper-Limb Hemiplegia After Stroke: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: Stroke patients experience chronic hemiparesis in their upper extremities leaving negative effects on quality of life. Robotic therapy is one method to recover arm function, but its research is still in its infancy. Research questions of this study is to investigate how to maximize the b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Takebayashi, Takashi, Takahashi, Kayoko, Amano, Satoru, Uchiyama, Yuki, Gosho, Masahiko, Domen, Kazuhisa, Hachisuka, Kenji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6121101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30210446
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00730
_version_ 1783352391878311936
author Takebayashi, Takashi
Takahashi, Kayoko
Amano, Satoru
Uchiyama, Yuki
Gosho, Masahiko
Domen, Kazuhisa
Hachisuka, Kenji
author_facet Takebayashi, Takashi
Takahashi, Kayoko
Amano, Satoru
Uchiyama, Yuki
Gosho, Masahiko
Domen, Kazuhisa
Hachisuka, Kenji
author_sort Takebayashi, Takashi
collection PubMed
description Background: Stroke patients experience chronic hemiparesis in their upper extremities leaving negative effects on quality of life. Robotic therapy is one method to recover arm function, but its research is still in its infancy. Research questions of this study is to investigate how to maximize the benefit of robotic therapy using ReoGo-J for arm hemiplegia in chronic stroke patients. Methods: Design of this study is a multi-center parallel group trial following the prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint (PROBE) study model. Participants and setting will be 120 chronic stroke patients (over 6 months post-stroke) will be randomly allocated to three different rehabilitation protocols. In this study, the control group will receive 20 min of standard rehabilitation (conventional occupational therapy) and 40 min of self-training (i.e., sanding, placing and stretching). The robotic therapy group will receive 20 min of standard rehabilitation and 40 min of robotic therapy using ReoGo®-J device. The combined therapy group will receive 40 min of robotic therapy and 20 min of constraint-induced movement therapy (protocol to improve upper-limb use in ADL suggests). This study employs the Fugl-Meyer Assessment upper-limb score (primary outcome), other arm function measures and the Stroke Impact Scale score will be measured at baseline, 5 and 10 weeks of the treatment phase. In analysis of this study, we use the mixed effects model for repeated measures to compare changes in outcomes between groups at 5 and 10 Weeks. The registration number of this study is UMIN000022509. Conclusions: This study is a feasible, multi-site randomized controlled trial to examine our hypothesis that combined training protocol could maximize the benefit of robotic therapy and best effective therapeutic strategy for patients with upper-limb hemiparesis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6121101
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-61211012018-09-12 Assessment of the Efficacy of ReoGo-J Robotic Training Against Other Rehabilitation Therapies for Upper-Limb Hemiplegia After Stroke: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial Takebayashi, Takashi Takahashi, Kayoko Amano, Satoru Uchiyama, Yuki Gosho, Masahiko Domen, Kazuhisa Hachisuka, Kenji Front Neurol Neurology Background: Stroke patients experience chronic hemiparesis in their upper extremities leaving negative effects on quality of life. Robotic therapy is one method to recover arm function, but its research is still in its infancy. Research questions of this study is to investigate how to maximize the benefit of robotic therapy using ReoGo-J for arm hemiplegia in chronic stroke patients. Methods: Design of this study is a multi-center parallel group trial following the prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint (PROBE) study model. Participants and setting will be 120 chronic stroke patients (over 6 months post-stroke) will be randomly allocated to three different rehabilitation protocols. In this study, the control group will receive 20 min of standard rehabilitation (conventional occupational therapy) and 40 min of self-training (i.e., sanding, placing and stretching). The robotic therapy group will receive 20 min of standard rehabilitation and 40 min of robotic therapy using ReoGo®-J device. The combined therapy group will receive 40 min of robotic therapy and 20 min of constraint-induced movement therapy (protocol to improve upper-limb use in ADL suggests). This study employs the Fugl-Meyer Assessment upper-limb score (primary outcome), other arm function measures and the Stroke Impact Scale score will be measured at baseline, 5 and 10 weeks of the treatment phase. In analysis of this study, we use the mixed effects model for repeated measures to compare changes in outcomes between groups at 5 and 10 Weeks. The registration number of this study is UMIN000022509. Conclusions: This study is a feasible, multi-site randomized controlled trial to examine our hypothesis that combined training protocol could maximize the benefit of robotic therapy and best effective therapeutic strategy for patients with upper-limb hemiparesis. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6121101/ /pubmed/30210446 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00730 Text en Copyright © 2018 Takebayashi, Takahashi, Amano, Uchiyama, Gosho, Domen and Hachisuka. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Takebayashi, Takashi
Takahashi, Kayoko
Amano, Satoru
Uchiyama, Yuki
Gosho, Masahiko
Domen, Kazuhisa
Hachisuka, Kenji
Assessment of the Efficacy of ReoGo-J Robotic Training Against Other Rehabilitation Therapies for Upper-Limb Hemiplegia After Stroke: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
title Assessment of the Efficacy of ReoGo-J Robotic Training Against Other Rehabilitation Therapies for Upper-Limb Hemiplegia After Stroke: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Assessment of the Efficacy of ReoGo-J Robotic Training Against Other Rehabilitation Therapies for Upper-Limb Hemiplegia After Stroke: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Assessment of the Efficacy of ReoGo-J Robotic Training Against Other Rehabilitation Therapies for Upper-Limb Hemiplegia After Stroke: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of the Efficacy of ReoGo-J Robotic Training Against Other Rehabilitation Therapies for Upper-Limb Hemiplegia After Stroke: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Assessment of the Efficacy of ReoGo-J Robotic Training Against Other Rehabilitation Therapies for Upper-Limb Hemiplegia After Stroke: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort assessment of the efficacy of reogo-j robotic training against other rehabilitation therapies for upper-limb hemiplegia after stroke: protocol for a randomized controlled trial
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6121101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30210446
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00730
work_keys_str_mv AT takebayashitakashi assessmentoftheefficacyofreogojrobotictrainingagainstotherrehabilitationtherapiesforupperlimbhemiplegiaafterstrokeprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT takahashikayoko assessmentoftheefficacyofreogojrobotictrainingagainstotherrehabilitationtherapiesforupperlimbhemiplegiaafterstrokeprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT amanosatoru assessmentoftheefficacyofreogojrobotictrainingagainstotherrehabilitationtherapiesforupperlimbhemiplegiaafterstrokeprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT uchiyamayuki assessmentoftheefficacyofreogojrobotictrainingagainstotherrehabilitationtherapiesforupperlimbhemiplegiaafterstrokeprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT goshomasahiko assessmentoftheefficacyofreogojrobotictrainingagainstotherrehabilitationtherapiesforupperlimbhemiplegiaafterstrokeprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT domenkazuhisa assessmentoftheefficacyofreogojrobotictrainingagainstotherrehabilitationtherapiesforupperlimbhemiplegiaafterstrokeprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hachisukakenji assessmentoftheefficacyofreogojrobotictrainingagainstotherrehabilitationtherapiesforupperlimbhemiplegiaafterstrokeprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial